| Alfie v Lambert 21:18 - Apr 13 with 479 views | ColDale |
Good finish Alfie |  | | |  |
| Alfie v Lambert on 21:18 - Apr 13 with 466 views | macro |
23 the saints have had so far with only Lamberts goal
4 for Reading |  | | |
| Alfie v Lambert on 21:56 - Apr 13 with 400 views | 442Dale |
The second was top quality. |  |
| |
| Alfie v Lambert on 22:46 - Apr 13 with 335 views | DorkingDale |
Go Alfie! |  | | |
| Alfie v Lambert on 22:49 - Apr 13 with 321 views | DySporting |
Alfie is doing what Simeon Jackson did for Norwich last year vital goals at the right time | | | |
| Alfie v Lambert on 23:00 - Apr 13 with 297 views | roccydaleian |
Not sure about this, but Coldale might know. If Southampton are promoted to the Premiership, do we receive another payment from the sale of Ricky Lambert. Also do we have a similar sell on clause with Alfie? |  | | |
| Alfie v Lambert on 23:03 - Apr 13 with 294 views | ColDale |
| Alfie v Lambert on 23:00 - Apr 13 by roccydaleian |
Not sure about this, but Coldale might know. If Southampton are promoted to the Premiership, do we receive another payment from the sale of Ricky Lambert. Also do we have a similar sell on clause with Alfie? |
we don't have a specific clause with either Southampton or Reading given we had no dealings with them. However, if Bristol Rovers or Rotherham stuck clauses in the sale which relate to promotion to the premiership (safe to assume that Rotherham would have done, Bristol Rovers might not have considered it at the time), then we'll receive 25% of whatever Bristol Rovers and Rotherham receive from clauses they put in. I wouldnt be at all surprised if we received at least £50,000 from their combined promotions. | | | |
| Alfie v Lambert on 23:41 - Apr 13 with 259 views | YadHoDale |
Could do with Brighton going up via the playoffs in that case (if Watford had a sell on clause on Will Buckley) |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
