Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
THAT injury 07:01 - Oct 24 with 6729 viewsE17hoop

Pudil seemed more than a little upset when he went off and, having seen the pic below, did Wednesday have a shout for a pen?


It's always noisiest at the shallow end
Poll: When you go to QPR games, what do you think will happen?

0



THAT injury on 15:08 - Oct 25 with 708 viewstimcocking

Having re watched it - nasty, he's almost kicked his eyes off. Only playing the ball, though. I'd look on that as very unfortunate, like an accidental clash of heads or whatever.
0

THAT injury on 15:15 - Oct 25 with 697 viewsdodge_stoke_r

so should this goal have stood? The only reason the Juve No 2 still has a head on his shoulders is because he pulled out of a headed challenge. Could easily have ended in the same way as Tuesday night. As you, yourself said,
Oppo nearby, no contact its playing in a dangerous manner - IDFK .

But it will go down as one of the best goals in European football.
[Post edited 25 Oct 2018 15:17]
0

THAT injury on 16:08 - Oct 25 with 657 viewssevenhoop

in the old days, that would be an indirect for 'dangerous play'. I'ms not aware of a law change (though there might have been) but, just like obstruction has disappeared as an offence - it's either a foul and direct free kick, or no foul - you don't see it any more
0

THAT injury on 16:11 - Oct 25 with 654 viewsPinnerPaul

You do!

There was one in the first half on Tuesday!

Weds player tried to played the ball close to Loungo's head, made contact with the ball.

IDFK given to us - I rest my case!
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024