| Katie Hopkins 17:25 - Jun 19 with 19959 views | Neath_Jack |
Permanently banned from Twitter. | |
| |  |
| Katie Hopkins on 11:00 - Jun 20 with 1489 views | ItchySphincter |
She’s continually trying to reinvent herself to stay relevant. She’s hoping to be adopted by the far right Yaxley-Lennon types and tread a path similar to Alex Jones but she must keep wondering why it always backfires on her. Maybe it’s because she’s a woman.....?*
*rhetorical | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 12:13 - Jun 20 with 1422 views | A_Fans_Dad |
Reading this post is very enlightening, surpisingly the only rational person on here is Darren.
The rest obviously do not believe in the "Freedom of Speech".
If she was banned for what is purported in the press then it really is a travesty of free speech,
She was apparently referring to Rashford's mother when she said women should “think about how they are going to feed a child before they decide to have it”and "I do not want to pay to feed other people’s kids. You are welcome to. Thank you, Katie Hopkins.".
That is neither right wing or racist in any way.
Hands up all those on here who agree with her sentiments about this subject only, I will be the first and probably the last.
Please don't bring up the "single mother bit" as they just makes it worse, unless her children's Father(s) died, because it is their job to provide for their offspring. | | | |
| Katie Hopkins on 12:31 - Jun 20 with 1409 views | Darran |
Surprisingly? Cheeky twát.  | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:26 - Jun 20 with 1384 views | LeonWasGod |
Didn’t work for Alex Jones, Infowars and Yaxley Lennon either. All have been permanently banned from Twitter. | | | |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:30 - Jun 20 with 1377 views | Ebo |
Her comments about gunning immigrants with boats and sinking them like rats led to one ban and that's mild to what she normally posts.
Twitter is a company that has specific rules and she broke those rules several times. If someone had posted similar on here multiple times, then a ban or would be looming.
As for freedom of speech, I think you mean freedom of expression. That also carries responsibility for his or her actions. She was far too extreme and got punished for it. | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:31 - Jun 20 with 1375 views | Darran |
Doesn’t apply to you though eh? | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:33 - Jun 20 with 1374 views | Lohengrin |
Start of a very slippery slope though, isn’t it? | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:33 - Jun 20 with 1373 views | Ebo |
It started off as a platform for web geeks to share information, post links to articles on code etc.. then people outside of that bubble got interested and it didn't take too long for it to become pretty toxic.
I miss the old Twitter. | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:37 - Jun 20 with 1358 views | A_Fans_Dad |
Surprising that you are the only one. | | | |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:40 - Jun 20 with 1352 views | Ebo |
Well, I don't go starting threads with the words 'shoot them' like you. You wanted a kid shot. | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:40 - Jun 20 with 1351 views | A_Fans_Dad |
"She was far too extreme and got punished for it. " in this particular instance?
So you are OK for banning people who tell the truth or speak common sense? [Post edited 20 Jun 2020 13:54]
| | | |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:42 - Jun 20 with 1350 views | Ebo |
She doesn't speak the truth and has zero common sense, come on mate you are not that deluded surely?
Her career is over now, she will have to get a real job and I do not have any sympathy whatsoever for her. | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:46 - Jun 20 with 1341 views | Humpty |
She wasn't banned for speaking the truth or common sense.
She was banned by a company for breaking their rules. | | | |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:53 - Jun 20 with 1330 views | Lohengrin |
 | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:56 - Jun 20 with 1318 views | Ebo |
Thing is Loh, people think they can do and say what they like on a public platform without reading the small print when registering. When they break those rules they have only themselves to blame. It is no different from breaking the rules at your place of work. You either get disciplined or dismissed. | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 13:58 - Jun 20 with 1317 views | Darran |
No but you did wish full blown AIDS on Theresa May,you did take the piss out of Theresa May when she said how devastated she was that she couldn’t have children,you did wish a Margaret Thatcher style stroke on Boris Johnson,you did suggest the IRA plant a bomb at the last Tory conference and you did most recently wish the most painful death possible from Covid-19 on Dominic Cummings and Priti Patel.
But hey that’s ok because you’re on the nice side so that’s ok eh?
Fuçking hypocrite. | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 14:02 - Jun 20 with 1309 views | A_Fans_Dad |
It has nothing to do with what she has done in the past.
If as they say she was banned for speaking common sense, ie do not have kids if you can't afford to feed them and don't expect us to do it for you, then it is you who are deluded.
Being banned by private companies is currently not aginst the law, but when that company declares itself for free speech then it is wrong.
They are controlling the narrative, we already know that they have an agenda, you only need to look at who they banned in the US and I am not talking about Trump.
Everywhere you look from MSM to Universities to football forums people are calling for bans on those that disagree with them, it gets more like 1984 every day. | | | |
| Katie Hopkins on 14:04 - Jun 20 with 1305 views | Ebo |
All you listed are total scum. Up there with the worst society has to offer. May is now living the life of luxury whilst the most vulnerable in society are still suffering from her policies.
As for the IRA and Patel - you made that up.
Don't try and bully me son. It won't wash with me. | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 14:07 - Jun 20 with 1298 views | LeonWasGod |
Not really. Companies don’t have to put up with hateful racists and conspiracy theorists using their platforms if they don’t want them. | | | |
| Katie Hopkins on 14:09 - Jun 20 with 1293 views | Darran |
No I didn’t make it up everything I’ve just said you’ve either posted on here or twitter in the last two years.
What you’ll probably do now is ask me to prove it because you know full well that you’ve deleted it.
You’re a fuçking hypocrite that feels because he’s on the nice side can say what he wants. | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 14:10 - Jun 20 with 1292 views | Lohengrin |
What else may companies decide they don’t want aired? Opinion pieces as to the uses of their financial interests perhaps? | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 14:12 - Jun 20 with 1287 views | Ebo |
Twitter has a strikes policy, she crossed the line with her BLM baiting, that was her final strike. Glad Rashford put her in her place.
Her most vicious was her 'final solution' tweet about illegal immigrants. That got her a ban too. | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 15:05 - Jun 20 with 1240 views | ItchySphincter |
Yeah, but people are still falling over themselves to follow them. I don’t care personally and wouldn’t have banned her, it’s interesting to see her views but she looks like she’s trying to be the pantomime villain half the time. | |
| |
| Katie Hopkins on 15:47 - Jun 20 with 1215 views | DJack |
You were happy when (a business entity) a baker refused to bake a cake for a gay couple put find it a problem when Twitter (a business entity) bans someone for contravening their rules. And you oft bang on about hypocrisy. Fck my eyes. | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
