| Compo issue? on 21:54 - Jan 23 with 1951 views | ColDale |
from that story, it would appear that the approximate compensation figure was known by all parties before it even got to talking terms. No reason to think it will be any different this time. |  | |  |
| Compo issue? on 21:58 - Jan 23 with 1915 views | dale_upon_tyne |
The air just whooshed out of my balloon (so to speak) having read that.
Let's hope we get our man and let's hope this deal isn't the end of our financial stability! They know we're desperate so he's not going to come cheap is he?... |  | | |
| Compo issue? on 21:58 - Jan 23 with 1908 views | borodale4 |
| Compo issue? on 21:54 - Jan 23 by ColDale |
from that story, it would appear that the approximate compensation figure was known by all parties before it even got to talking terms. No reason to think it will be any different this time. |
I'm assuming for us to get to the stage of 'agreeing terms' the potential compo figures have been discussed and principally agreed as Coleman is now really in a cant go back stage. I guess its just the finer details of the whole package that is holding it up. |  | | |
| Compo issue? on 22:13 - Jan 23 with 1801 views | Brierls |
| Compo issue? on 21:58 - Jan 23 by dale_upon_tyne |
The air just whooshed out of my balloon (so to speak) having read that.
Let's hope we get our man and let's hope this deal isn't the end of our financial stability! They know we're desperate so he's not going to come cheap is he?... |
Compared to what we've paid clubs in compensation in the past, no he's not going to come cheap! I may be in an overly optimistic mood, but I read that BBC story and was encouraged because we're beyond the discussing terms stage. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
