| Ben injured then? 16:01 - Nov 2 with 4198 views | QuakerJack |
Or just not good enough for Spurs' bench?
Loan move in January. |  |
| |  |
| Ben injured then? on 16:09 - Nov 2 with 3102 views | STEVE1 |
A bit of a puzzle that they went out of their way to get him and pay in the region of 10 million but is not getting much of a look in we need back up but cannot see us getting Davies back. |  | | |
| Ben injured then? on 16:12 - Nov 2 with 3085 views | orion3016 |
Definitely worth an enquiry. they maybe looking for a new manager in January which could hamper us but you do wonder if pochetino rates him |  |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 16:16 - Nov 2 with 3063 views | MrSwan |
I have no idea why he bought him just shows how bad of a manager he is spurs need a new manager. | |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 16:22 - Nov 2 with 3039 views | shandyjack |
| Ben injured then? on 16:16 - Nov 2 by MrSwan |
I have no idea why he bought him just shows how bad of a manager he is spurs need a new manager. |
can hardly say he is a bad manager after what he did at Saints last season, had a slow start and needs a good 18 months to sort out the mess at spurs |  |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 16:43 - Nov 2 with 2951 views | PatchesOHoulihan |
Watching them now it looks like they probably sold their best player to us |  |
| This is Patches O'Houlihan saying "Take care of your balls, and they'll take care of you." |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 16:49 - Nov 2 with 2915 views | raynor94 |
| Ben injured then? on 16:16 - Nov 2 by MrSwan |
I have no idea why he bought him just shows how bad of a manager he is spurs need a new manager. |
He didn't buy him, it was the director of football baldini, he has to work with the players he's given |  |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 16:51 - Nov 2 with 2900 views | Jackfath |
Spurs are cack. |  |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 16:52 - Nov 2 with 2887 views | Whiterockin |
How many players can you loan from another Premier League club? |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Ben injured then? on 16:53 - Nov 2 with 2877 views | ItchySphincter |
We don't need Spurs's cast offs. |  |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 16:55 - Nov 2 with 2871 views | MrSwan |
Totenhams time in the premier league coming to an end | |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 16:57 - Nov 2 with 2860 views | orion3016 |
| Ben injured then? on 16:55 - Nov 2 by MrSwan |
Totenhams time in the premier league coming to an end |
They're not that bad! Far worse than them but pochetino on borrowed time if they lose today | |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 17:51 - Nov 2 with 2714 views | Jackfath |
Villa are cacker | |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 17:59 - Nov 2 with 2687 views | airedale |
Wasn't impressed with Rose at all in the first half. Not a patch on Ben. |  | | |
| Ben injured then? on 18:08 - Nov 2 with 2641 views | blaine_scfc |
Ben Davies is so over rated on here it's unreal. He was a weak link last season and cost us plenty of times, would also be interesting to see his pass completion stats compared to the rest of the team last year.
Not good enough for a top 6 team and the Spurs management have identified that hence offering Danny Rose a four year contract two weeks after Davies signed for them. |  | | |
| Ben injured then? on 23:14 - Nov 2 with 2314 views | Kilkennyjack |
I would certainly get Ben back. The only meaningful player we have produced since 2009. Thats half a decade now in old money. Ben is a young quality international player and i cant see any valid reason for not welcoming him back with open arms. Except his wages ! |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Ben injured then? on 14:07 - Nov 4 with 1959 views | Spokenword |
The only way we should take Ben back on Loan is if Taylor gets injured. What if Ben plays well if he comes back and Taylor drops to the bench?. If we are gonna sign a left back it would have to be a perm switch. We need someone at right back more than anything. [Post edited 4 Nov 2014 14:09]
|  | | |
| Ben injured then? on 14:08 - Nov 4 with 1954 views | Starsky |
| Ben injured then? on 23:14 - Nov 2 by Kilkennyjack |
I would certainly get Ben back. The only meaningful player we have produced since 2009. Thats half a decade now in old money. Ben is a young quality international player and i cant see any valid reason for not welcoming him back with open arms. Except his wages ! |
And Joe Allen |  |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 14:57 - Nov 4 with 1887 views | waynekerr55 |
| Ben injured then? on 18:08 - Nov 2 by blaine_scfc |
Ben Davies is so over rated on here it's unreal. He was a weak link last season and cost us plenty of times, would also be interesting to see his pass completion stats compared to the rest of the team last year.
Not good enough for a top 6 team and the Spurs management have identified that hence offering Danny Rose a four year contract two weeks after Davies signed for them. |
So you'd have Taylor instead then? |  |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 15:13 - Nov 4 with 1849 views | Zut_Alors |
Ben will come good. Can't believe he's getting such stick now from our fans. We go Gylfi out of the deal and he's been fantastic. |  | | |
| Ben injured then? on 15:17 - Nov 4 with 1846 views | C_jack |
| Ben injured then? on 18:08 - Nov 2 by blaine_scfc |
Ben Davies is so over rated on here it's unreal. He was a weak link last season and cost us plenty of times, would also be interesting to see his pass completion stats compared to the rest of the team last year.
Not good enough for a top 6 team and the Spurs management have identified that hence offering Danny Rose a four year contract two weeks after Davies signed for them. |
Yeah of course, Spurs were going buy a player and then decide if he's any good two weeks later.
He was put into our side way ahead of schedule, most players his age haven't played anywhere near the amount of games he has at the top level, it is not a two week project. |  |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 15:46 - Nov 4 with 1817 views | monmouth |
He'll come good. Not sure it'll be at Spurs though. |  |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 15:50 - Nov 4 with 1806 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Ben injured then? on 15:17 - Nov 4 by C_jack |
Yeah of course, Spurs were going buy a player and then decide if he's any good two weeks later.
He was put into our side way ahead of schedule, most players his age haven't played anywhere near the amount of games he has at the top level, it is not a two week project. |
he's not 18 !
He's 22 or so isn't he? Older or same age as Shelvey? Older than Carroll, and not much younger than the likes of Gylfi.
he may well come good, but Spurs didn't pay £10m for a player to be, at best, reserve left back - it's not working out as they planned. I wouldn't be surprised to see him out on loan in January if something doesn't change. Either to a lower PL team, or even more likely, to someone at the top of the championship.
It's not been a good move for him at the moment - that may well change, but he's also lost his place for now to Taylor in the Welsh team. | | | |
| Ben injured then? on 16:47 - Nov 4 with 1760 views | C_jack |
| Ben injured then? on 15:50 - Nov 4 by londonlisa2001 |
he's not 18 !
He's 22 or so isn't he? Older or same age as Shelvey? Older than Carroll, and not much younger than the likes of Gylfi.
he may well come good, but Spurs didn't pay £10m for a player to be, at best, reserve left back - it's not working out as they planned. I wouldn't be surprised to see him out on loan in January if something doesn't change. Either to a lower PL team, or even more likely, to someone at the top of the championship.
It's not been a good move for him at the moment - that may well change, but he's also lost his place for now to Taylor in the Welsh team. |
He's 21, and has played near 80 games at the top level in just two seasons, you won't find many other 19/20 year olds who will have done that, for obvious reasons, it's an incredible amount. It has taken Jonjo Shelvey twice the amount of years to reach the same amount of games.
IMO the slightly less intense period of games this season will benefit him in the long term significantly.
This has been done numerous times, Spurs paid for a young, exciting prospect that they could work on, not the finished article. They did not buy Ben Davies with the intention of getting 50 games a season out of him. They did the same with Chris Gunter, although on a slightly smaller monetary scale, but the same principle. | |
| |
| Ben injured then? on 16:50 - Nov 4 with 1752 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Ben injured then? on 16:47 - Nov 4 by C_jack |
He's 21, and has played near 80 games at the top level in just two seasons, you won't find many other 19/20 year olds who will have done that, for obvious reasons, it's an incredible amount. It has taken Jonjo Shelvey twice the amount of years to reach the same amount of games.
IMO the slightly less intense period of games this season will benefit him in the long term significantly.
This has been done numerous times, Spurs paid for a young, exciting prospect that they could work on, not the finished article. They did not buy Ben Davies with the intention of getting 50 games a season out of him. They did the same with Chris Gunter, although on a slightly smaller monetary scale, but the same principle. |
no I understand they don't want 50 games from him, but I'm pretty certain they were hoping for more than 50 minutes (premier league minutes that is).
he's a little younger than I thought - i thought he was 22, so my mistake. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
