By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 11:39 - Nov 14 by Badlands
Not sure why you are getting abuse for stating a fact and offering a hope. There again what have facts or an opinion doing on this forum?
Have a think. I dare you.
Could it be to do with his reluctance or inability to offer balanced views whilst trying to conveniently over look the last few years completely including the sly devious dealings and selfish antics which were to the detriment of the Club? And to the Supporters Trust: who he used and abused systematically throughout until ditching them like a twopenny rabbit?
Nah couldn’t be any of that surely not.
Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day
0
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 12:18 - Nov 14 with 2074 views
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 22:10 - Nov 13 by Nortbankboy
But still the most successful in the club's history.
Hope we can see those days again,I'd love another 7 yrs in Premiership,and perhaps win the fans cup this time
Very true, you shouldn't get grief for pointing out the obvious. He did a fantastic job of resurrecting the club leading to 7 yrs in the PL. He (and the other sellouts) also destroyed their reputations at the end.
4
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 14:35 - Nov 14 with 2004 views
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 11:39 - Nov 14 by Badlands
Not sure why you are getting abuse for stating a fact and offering a hope. There again what have facts or an opinion doing on this forum?
He's not getting any abuse from me. All mine is aimed at the shithouse, pathetic, dissembling, inventor of history Jenkins.
Swans had their most successful period under his chairmanship. Of course. That is not to say it was only down to him, and the bit that was down to him was more than adequately rewarded.
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 22:39 - Nov 12 by Badlands
Nor did any of the other shareholders or shareholder groups or shareholder group members. Money was invested in our future - he and the other shareholders the shareholder groups and shareholder group members at the time need to be congratulated and deserve our thanks.
So Martin Morgan did'nt benefit finacncially from the building development at either Landore or Fairwood?
YEs the club has been left with great facilities which have provided our current first team with some players but individuals "benefited" financially as this money went to their pockets.
Why did HJ need to pay himself such a high salary? THis was club was sold to everone as "not just another club" . Justr because other PL chairmen were being paid silly mpney doesnt mean a fan runnng for the fans needed to match othere.
YEs without the likes of HJ,MM et al we would not have got to the PL but boy did they get repaid.....unlike a certain Mel Nurse who made the whole rescue of the club back from Petty possible and then he donated his shares back to the club only for the sellouts to cash them in.
Now I see why uyou are so supportive of the Yanks......I dont actually believe they are siphoning off funds as the conspirancy theorists keep preaching about yet if they are they are only doing what our so called saviours ended up doing...alledgedly on the face of things
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 16:59 - Nov 14 by vetchonian
So Martin Morgan did'nt benefit finacncially from the building development at either Landore or Fairwood?
YEs the club has been left with great facilities which have provided our current first team with some players but individuals "benefited" financially as this money went to their pockets.
Why did HJ need to pay himself such a high salary? THis was club was sold to everone as "not just another club" . Justr because other PL chairmen were being paid silly mpney doesnt mean a fan runnng for the fans needed to match othere.
YEs without the likes of HJ,MM et al we would not have got to the PL but boy did they get repaid.....unlike a certain Mel Nurse who made the whole rescue of the club back from Petty possible and then he donated his shares back to the club only for the sellouts to cash them in.
Now I see why uyou are so supportive of the Yanks......I dont actually believe they are siphoning off funds as the conspirancy theorists keep preaching about yet if they are they are only doing what our so called saviours ended up doing...alledgedly on the face of things
Well if the yanks can achieve that success i will be a happy swan
1
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 21:40 - Nov 14 with 1831 views
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 14:35 - Nov 14 by monmouth
He's not getting any abuse from me. All mine is aimed at the shithouse, pathetic, dissembling, inventor of history Jenkins.
Swans had their most successful period under his chairmanship. Of course. That is not to say it was only down to him, and the bit that was down to him was more than adequately rewarded.
He's still a total excuse for a 'man'.
I remember our first season in the Premier League and or first game at Stamford Bridge. Friend of mine, a rent boy, got 2 tickets so was in the away posh end. At the cordon I walked past HJ who was remonstrating with the stewards because they wouldn’t let him past the barrier in his Audi. He thought he’d arrived at the top table but they didn’t know him from Adam. Makes me laugh now but at the time I felt sorry for him.
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 22:10 - Nov 13 by Nortbankboy
But still the most successful in the club's history.
Hope we can see those days again,I'd love another 7 yrs in Premiership,and perhaps win the fans cup this time
Well, well, here’s your revered Mr Jenkins speaking out BEFORE he took the money and ran ....(eventually anyway) ....we’d be a lot better off if the Yanks had appointed Trevor Birch from the outset rather than the ‘Old Boys Brigade’, self appointed and deluded Director Of Football. What could possibly go wrong ? 🤔🙄😂😂
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 23:13 - Nov 14 by bonymine
Well, well, here’s your revered Mr Jenkins speaking out BEFORE he took the money and ran ....(eventually anyway) ....we’d be a lot better off if the Yanks had appointed Trevor Birch from the outset rather than the ‘Old Boys Brigade’, self appointed and deluded Director Of Football. What could possibly go wrong ? 🤔🙄😂😂
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 23:13 - Nov 14 by bonymine
Well, well, here’s your revered Mr Jenkins speaking out BEFORE he took the money and ran ....(eventually anyway) ....we’d be a lot better off if the Yanks had appointed Trevor Birch from the outset rather than the ‘Old Boys Brigade’, self appointed and deluded Director Of Football. What could possibly go wrong ? 🤔🙄😂😂
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 20:13 - Nov 16 by Garyjack
There's only word that sums up that video for me.
EVIDENCE!
As I've said a few times now, I've always been amazed that his own words haven't been systematically and relentlessly against him again and again in public Gary.
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 20:39 - Nov 16 by monmouth
As I've said a few times now, I've always been amazed that his own words haven't been systematically and relentlessly against him again and again in public Gary.
I'm sure it's not being lost on the trusts legal team Mon.
1
Huw Jenkins and the Daniel James deal on 21:36 - Nov 16 with 1391 views