Forum | The New Swans Board by QJumpingJack

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

The New Swans Board 14:08 - Oct 23 with 710 views

I was just reading another post on another site.
What have the new board bought to the table since late July?

- a press conference which turned into a debacle and was delayed by a day
- no strategy in the transfer market at the back end of August when key players departed
- a poor approach in replacing FG - played out via the press
- the Trust being ignored - is this on purpose or just stupidity?

Their PR has been very poor to date.

Are there any positives?

The New Swans Board on 14:10 - Oct 23 with 699 views

dobjack2

They have brought 4 votes to the majority owners who can outvote the trust even if heaven forbid Morgan and Jenkins voted with the trust.

The New Swans Board on 14:12 - Oct 23 with 681 views

Loyal

The only positive I can think of is the fact we don't have to listen to their bullshit and lies.

	Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows. The official inventor of the tit w@nk.
Poll:	Who should be Swansea number 1

The New Swans Board on 14:15 - Oct 23 with 669 views

Darran

Didn't we already know this though?

	The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
Poll:	Who’s got the most experts

The New Swans Board on 15:56 - Oct 23 with 570 views

Nookiejack

They seemed to have a strategy of consolidating the 10% to 20% holdings into a controlling stake. This itself adds value to their investment as gives them a control premium. It looks then like they were hoping us to survive and then flip the shares to a Chinese consortium or the like.

They also have little downside risk as can sell off all our players and the ones on high wages and bank the parachute money.

So not a bad investment strategy.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread