| Your Report | Queens Park Rangers v Middlesbrough Your Report added by williamwill009 at 17:17:11 What a game yesterday, wasn't it? It's always amazing to see how strategy and persistence translate into real results on the field. It reminds me of the importance of not only cheering but also the ability to find other ways to implement your strategies and goals. That's why I started paying attention to various online platforms like https://91-club.co.in/ , where you can not only have fun, but also earn money through games, promotion programs, and bonuses. It became for me a kind of continuation of the excitement of football matches, but already in the financial plane, where everyone can test their strategies and intuition. Are there those of you who are also looking for additional opportunities for income and entertainment in the off-season? |
| Your Report | Queens Park Rangers v Middlesbrough Your Report added by Wease1 at 14:11:28 Just wanted to give a shoutout to lorservice.com for their excellent online letter of recommendation service https://www.lorservice.com/ I needed a recommendation letter for grad school, and they made the process so easy and stress-free. The letter they wrote was perfect, and I know it played a big role in my acceptance. Thanks for the great work! Seriously, if you're in need of a recommendation letter, give them a try! |
| Your Report | Sunderland v Queens Park Rangers Your Report added by Geoff78 at 21:52:45 Definitely could have won this against a weak Sunderland team who offered little threat. Dykes was especially ineffective and after his recent outings as a midfielder seems to have completely forgotten that he's meant to score goals. But although we did create chances apart from Willock's near the end they weren't gilt edged. We gave the ball away far too often when under little pressure and at times we looked over confident. I hope no one is thinking we're doing enough to be safe. Although our form under Marti is solidly mid-table it wouldn't take much for it all to go pear shaped. No one deserved a MotM award but JCS was impressive at the back although he didn't have a lot to deal with. Armstrong good when he came on and got behind the defence on 4 (I think) occasions. For a couple of chances he ended up too wide to really threaten the keeper but his square ball for Willock should have been buried. |
| Your Report | Sunderland v Queens Park Rangers Your Report added by OldPedro at 22:01:27 In a relatively poor game, we created enough chances to win but didn't take one. Generally felt that Sunderland were there for the taking and that we needed to play with more pace and urgency in our passing. Too often, passes were sideways or backwards and just too safe. When we added Sinclair's pace the chances started to come - Willock should have scored the pull back from Armstrong. Overall, as none of our relegation rivals won, it's a point gained but frustrating that it wasn't more. |
| Your Report | Queens Park Rangers v Middlesbrough Your Report added by Geoff78 at 11:07:38 On the way to the game I said to my wife if Rs win today we can really feel a corner has been turned and we're almost certainly safe, but if we lose it'll be nail biting to the end of the season. Knowing QPR many of us will have suspected the likely outcome. A decent if uninspiring first half where we seemed to have a couple of decent chances (can't see clearly from the upper Loft) was followed by a transformed Middlesbrough who dominated the second 45. They were more aggressive, closed us down, tackled hard, may have got away with some borderline decisions and stopped us from playing as we visibly tired. Andersen had a good first half, but was targeted in the second and didn't stand up too well to the physical challenges. He needs to get used to this physicality. Willock also looked tired and I was surprised he was left on, but Chair taken off. Smyth came on and provided energy down the right, but was well contained by the Boro defence. Somehow the substitutions didn't seem quite right. Sinclair could have come on earlier ahead of Dykes and although this wasn't his best game Chair was more of a threat than Willock. Cook had a poorer game than we've become used to, but may struggle to play 3 games in a week. Hard to pick a QPR MotM. No one was dreadful, but no one was great either. Pretty well straight sixes in the ratings. Think it's between Andersen for his first half class or Dunne for his energy coming forward. Back to the nail biting now. |
| Your Report | Queens Park Rangers v West Bromwich Albion Your Report added by Geoff78 at 11:35:44 I agree CateLeBonR. I scribbled my review and then did the ratings and had only 3 at 7/10 and Sam at 8. I was going to give a couple who shall remain nameless - ok, Smyth and Paal - a 5 but then thought that was unfair. Smyth's pace always keeps the full back honest even though he doesn't deliver enough end product and Paal is having a dip in form. A good all round performance, but a terrific atmosphere added to by the memories of Stan. |
| Your Report | Queens Park Rangers v West Bromwich Albion Your Report added by Geoff78 at 10:23:07 Fabulous night at Lotus Road and possibly the best performance from the Rs for at least this season. Just disappointing that we didn't get the third goal. At half time I thought we were the better team even though behind, but we totally dominated the second 45 such that the Baggies hardly got out of their half for long periods. Several of our managers have tried to play Sam Field further forward but his passing hasn't been good enough and he's looked like a fish out of water. But with Hayden the first choice for the deep lying role Marti seems to be helping Sam to learn this new role and he should have had a hat trick. It may be a question of confidence and also realising there is now competition for a midfield starting spot. For most of his time with us he's been the only option. I didn't see the hand ball and it wasn't obvious so maybe difficult for the officials. The earlier penalty looked soft. Frey impressed. He's much more mobile than I imagined and put in a real shift. Cook was excellent but it has to be Sam for MotM. |
| Your Report | Birmingham City v Southampton Your Report added by PezzaSaint at 10:30:27 Birmingham’s first goal down to Bednarek (ball watching) and Adam Armstrong (didn’t track back), but don’t know what Manning was doing so far up the pitch in the 2nd minute?! He struggled to get back! The shot wasn’t going in until Manning deflected it! Birmingham’s second goal down to Bednarek and Manning, they didn’t communicate!” Both their first two goals down our left!! Last goal again down our left hand side again, Manning turned inside out, but Jack Stephens was more interested in wrestling his player rather than challenging to get the ball. That said, some of our play was great to watch, COYS |
Please log in to use all the site's facilities | |