By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
But it is far more difficult to achieve than many of our politicians pretend and 40% reduction is a good thing.
Taking the stance that no measure is good until that figure I zero is an admirable target but not realistic.
I’d bet if Reform were in power and in their first year they knocked thousands of the figure, many of those disparaging Labour would be shouting it from the rooftops.
It’s no secret what I think of Reform, but I will say they have challenged the establishment, given a section of society a voice and encouraged more people to show and interest in politics. These are good things.
It’s a shame that some can see no good in a 40% reduction in boat crossings.
I go back to my original point that people who can’t say a 40% reduction is a good thing is ideological.
Those who want warships in the ocean and gun turrets across the south coast need to come to terms with that fact that it won’t happen no matter who they vote for. Because it’s a bit mad.
Mainly because I don’t see any issue with any of his convictions.
I’m not for abolishing juries but what’s the point if in cases such as Robinson’s last one which was a jury trial, people still call stitch up?
That article (unsurprisingly) from the guardian talks about political prisoners from the left - climate action and Gaza. Is your point that the government is imprisoning people from both sides? I’m not sure that makes sense.
It’ll be the sentencing guidelines attached to the crime committed.
Not my area of expertise but my best guess would be a minimum of a suspended sentence and at the other end a maximum of 4 years (bearing in mind previous character will be taken in to account)