By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
With Southgate more than likely going after this summers Euro’s, who do you think will replace him, or who would you like?
Personally, I think the FA should beak the bank and go for Pep Guardiola. I honestly think that if he’d have been in charge for the last two tournaments, England would already be European and World champions.
How the hell did they get that team name accepted? 😂😂
A North London amateur football club have postponed their semi-final cup match after they found out their opponents were called... pic.twitter.com/2cpGKw8VLr
1. QPR v Tottenham, the Gurnham Singh match. I’ve never seen so many people so angry with what went on during the game. That was as close as you’ll get to cheating.
2. Charlton v QPR in the FA Cup 4th round around 2000. It was refereed by our old mate, Rob Styles. He really hated us. He gave us nothing all game.
3. QPR v Grimsby in our relegation season in 2000/01. Nothing wrong with the referee in this one. We absolutely battered them for the first 80 minutes. We did everything but score. Their goalkeeper saved bloody everything, and he had the game of his life. Then they broke away and scored to win 1-0. How we lost that game remains a mystery.
QPR v Man Utd in 1996 (Cantona) would definitely have been on the list, but I was on a weekender in Amsterdam.
There’s others, but I’ll leave them to you lot for your take.
I was at a mates house earlier with another mate, and one of them was telling a story about a geezer who ran a lottery syndicate in his work, but he was pocketing the money instead of buying lottery tickets. He said he’d have ripped the geezers head off if he was part of his syndicate.
Anyway, I mentioned about a syndicate we’re both in with the Euro lottery. There was a work colleague who hadn’t paid for 2 years, and I said he wouldn’t be entitled to any winnings if we’d have won the jackpot. My mate said he would’ve been entitled as he’s a registered name on the syndicate records with Camelot, even though his line was being paid by the geezer running it.
We had a proper heated discussion about whether he’d be entitled to any money. No fisticuffs or anything, but a proper heated discussion with laughter involved.
As this site is brilliant for finding things out, can I ask who would be correct?
Would the fella who hadn’t paid for 2 years be entitled to any winnings?
It’s all hypothetical, as we won sod all anyway :-)).