| £19M for Wilf? 09:30 - Jun 3 with 5015 views | JethroJack |
According to Sky Sports, we've declared a value of £19M for Wilf.
Why do this BEFORE the World Cup?
Is this figure enough of a deterrant? |  | | |  |
| £19M for Wilf? on 19:25 - Jun 3 with 1565 views | exiledclaseboy |
| £19M for Wilf? on 19:19 - Jun 3 by controversial_jack |
£19 m is about right as he's had just one good season in the prem.Big clubs will want to see if he can repeat it before investing big money |
Then they can wait, because it would be madness to sell him for £19m now unless we're contractually obliged to do so.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 20:14 - Jun 3 with 1458 views | DwightYorkeSuperstar |
| £19M for Wilf? on 19:24 - Jun 3 by dgt73 |
It looks like Dwight has gone missing in action once again. He does that regular, especially when he just had a new arse ripped into him. [Post edited 3 Jun 2014 19:55]
|
When did I have a new arse ripped into me? |  |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 20:18 - Jun 3 with 1449 views | perchrockjack |
cmon Dwight he s simply got his syntax wrong. Christian forgiveness mun |  |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 20:32 - Jun 3 with 1419 views | DwightYorkeSuperstar |
| £19M for Wilf? on 20:18 - Jun 3 by perchrockjack |
cmon Dwight he s simply got his syntax wrong. Christian forgiveness mun |
I'm not a very forgiving person I'm afraid, Perch.
Although I have nothing against dgt so there is no need for forgiveness. If anything I pity him. | |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 20:42 - Jun 3 with 1401 views | Starsky |
And yet another thread gone off topic and is once again, all about Dwight  |  |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 20:54 - Jun 3 with 1348 views | DwightYorkeSuperstar |
| £19M for Wilf? on 20:42 - Jun 3 by Starsky |
And yet another thread gone off topic and is once again, all about Dwight |
If you read through the thread again you will see it was not I who took the thread off topic, but yet again I am accused of doing so. | |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 20:59 - Jun 3 with 1333 views | borinifanclub |
watching the video of his 26 goals he is worth 20 mill of anyones money...he is so cool on the ball so strong and where does all that empty space in the box come from? he knows how to move and times it eight.....we would be bonkers to sell him. We do need to buy a back up though especiallly for africa nations time next year. |  |
| Every day I thank the good Lord for the blessings he gives me. Every new day gives me a new opportunity to laugh at the red chumps up the road. |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 21:06 - Jun 3 with 1316 views | Starsky |
| £19M for Wilf? on 20:59 - Jun 3 by borinifanclub |
watching the video of his 26 goals he is worth 20 mill of anyones money...he is so cool on the ball so strong and where does all that empty space in the box come from? he knows how to move and times it eight.....we would be bonkers to sell him. We do need to buy a back up though especiallly for africa nations time next year. |
£nothing less than £25 million... Next year | |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| £19M for Wilf? on 21:46 - Jun 3 with 1247 views | JethroJack |
Every time you post on here  | | | |
| £19M for Wilf? on 22:30 - Jun 3 with 1202 views | MagicDaps |
| £19M for Wilf? on 19:01 - Jun 3 by DwightYorkeSuperstar |
I wonder how many people will defend the board if he is sold for £19m. |
I see you're now having to revert to hypothetical situations that won't happen to criticize the board.
Every club has to be subject to rubbish in the media, and there's nothing that our board can do about speculation driven by their desire to get attention. | |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 06:46 - Jun 4 with 1103 views | Dr_Winston |
Cooze has denied the existence of the clause on Twitter. |  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 08:26 - Jun 4 with 1035 views | Phil_S |
So to the people who believe we would accept £19m for Wilf. Please explain your logic why you believe it? |  | | |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:13 - Jun 4 with 979 views | Uxbridge |
| £19M for Wilf? on 08:26 - Jun 4 by Phil_S |
So to the people who believe we would accept £19m for Wilf. Please explain your logic why you believe it? |
Because, as Darran pointed out yesterday, if Wilf wanted a £19m clause inserted we were utterly powerless to stop it. Obvious mun. The fact it's only £4m more than we paid for him is utterly irrelevant.  |  |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:17 - Jun 4 with 970 views | JackSomething |
Not that I think this clause exists, but didn't Liverpool prove last season with Suarez that they're pretty much irrelevant anyway?
I imagine it would be enforceable if the player took legal action, but that seems unlikely. [Post edited 4 Jun 2014 9:45]
|  |
| You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help. |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:21 - Jun 4 with 956 views | Uxbridge |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:17 - Jun 4 by JackSomething |
Not that I think this clause exists, but didn't Liverpool prove last season with Suarez that they're pretty much irrelevant anyway?
I imagine it would be enforceable if the player took legal action, but that seems unlikely. [Post edited 4 Jun 2014 9:45]
|
That was a daft clause though. All it said was the the player could talk to the other club, not that the club had to sell. Utterly irrelevant. | |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:26 - Jun 4 with 884 views | Neath_Jack |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:21 - Jun 4 by Uxbridge |
That was a daft clause though. All it said was the the player could talk to the other club, not that the club had to sell. Utterly irrelevant. |
Wasn't that the same type of clause in Neil Taylors contract a few years back when, i think it was Newcastle who wanted him? |  |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:28 - Jun 4 with 879 views | Neath_Jack |
When i stop and actually think about the figures being bandied about, it's absolutely unreal to think our club can ask for £20million + for one of our players. Even more bonkers is that we are complaining that there might only be a £4million profit. Who would have dared to even think that just a few short years ago. Little Swansea City eh. | |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:30 - Jun 4 with 872 views | Uxbridge |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:26 - Jun 4 by Neath_Jack |
Wasn't that the same type of clause in Neil Taylors contract a few years back when, i think it was Newcastle who wanted him? |
Yep, think so. All the clause does is cause friction. | |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:35 - Jun 4 with 863 views | JackSomething |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:21 - Jun 4 by Uxbridge |
That was a daft clause though. All it said was the the player could talk to the other club, not that the club had to sell. Utterly irrelevant. |
Perhaps this is the same thing and people are getting their panties in a bunch over nothing? Again. | |
| You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help. |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:44 - Jun 4 with 853 views | Uxbridge |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:35 - Jun 4 by JackSomething |
Perhaps this is the same thing and people are getting their panties in a bunch over nothing? Again. |
Or perhaps it doesn't exist at all. I don't know. The one thing I can be pretty certain on is that there's very very little chance that we would be forced to sell at a price so close to his original purchase price. | |
| |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:56 - Jun 4 with 834 views | Phil_S |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:44 - Jun 4 by Uxbridge |
Or perhaps it doesn't exist at all. I don't know. The one thing I can be pretty certain on is that there's very very little chance that we would be forced to sell at a price so close to his original purchase price. |
Logic and common sense. Please no more. | | | |
| £19M for Wilf? on 10:14 - Jun 4 with 795 views | JACKARSE |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:17 - Jun 4 by JackSomething |
Not that I think this clause exists, but didn't Liverpool prove last season with Suarez that they're pretty much irrelevant anyway?
I imagine it would be enforceable if the player took legal action, but that seems unlikely. [Post edited 4 Jun 2014 9:45]
|
SUAREZ clause ......
'During the summer transfer window, the PFA reported that the contractual provision in Suarez’s contract with Liverpool was a ‘good faith’ release clause rather than an automatic release clause. The two are quite different. With an automatic release clause, player ‘y’ must be allowed to speak to purchasing club ‘x’ if the minimum release amount is offered. A ‘good faith’ clause means the parties are required to negotiate in good faith once a bid has been made. Importantly, a good faith clause does not automatically trigger the selling club to accept the offer.
The PFA were reported to have been arbitrating between the player and the club, and explaining to the player the likelihood of the clause standing up to a robust legal examination. As such, it was considered by the PFA that the clause was not an automatic release clause.'
JOE ALLEN clause .....
'Only a few Premier League transfers have been reported to have included release clauses. This was the case with the Demba Ba transfer from Newcastle to Chelsea and Joe Allen from Swansea to Liverpool In the case of Allen, reports were that the bid could only trigger the release clause if it came from one of five clubs that included Liverpool.' |  | | |
| £19M for Wilf? on 11:32 - Jun 4 with 735 views | Uxbridge |
| £19M for Wilf? on 09:56 - Jun 4 by Phil_S |
Logic and common sense. Please no more. |
It's silly season. Neither have a place on here. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
