| Already it doesn`t sound good... 09:17 - Nov 16 with 202 views | spudgun |
The few snippets that have been trailed on the Prince Andrew interview tonight.
He has `no recollection` of meeting the woman in question and having sex with her on three occasions.
And `it was the honourable thing to do` (staying at Epstein`s house, after he had been found guilty of misdemeanours with underage girls).
I do hope Emily Maitlis is her usual forensic self in the interview; if she is, it should be a slam dunk...
| | | |  |
| Already it doesn`t sound good... on 09:42 - Nov 16 with 195 views | Lala |
Well for me the man is guilty as hell and at best a total sleazebag. I agree, I hope your Emily doesn’t hold back just because he’s royalty.
What does royalty even mean 🤔 | |
| |
| Already it doesn`t sound good... on 10:21 - Nov 16 with 188 views | spell_chekker |
Oh dear, Randy Andy in trouble, is he? | |
| |
| Already it doesn`t sound good... on 11:48 - Nov 16 with 181 views | BringBackTheRedRoom |
Lets just say, I'm not his biggest fan.
However I'm not 100% sure what it is he's being accused of, apart from being a friend of (a very wealthy) sick pervert.
I'll have to watch it tonight. | |
| ‘Where there is harmony, may we bring discord. Where there is truth, may we bring error. Where there is faith, may we bring doubt. And where there is hope, may we bring despair’ |
| |
| Already it doesn`t sound good... on 23:39 - Nov 16 with 171 views | BringBackTheRedRoom |
Good grief, who told him doing that would be a good idea. | |
| ‘Where there is harmony, may we bring discord. Where there is truth, may we bring error. Where there is faith, may we bring doubt. And where there is hope, may we bring despair’ |
| |
| Already it doesn`t sound good... on 08:44 - Nov 17 with 164 views | spudgun |
Crikey, where do you start! Baldrick would have spun a more convincing yarn.
This will snowball, and it is not surprising Ms Maxwell has `gone to ground` apparently.
The drawback of centuries of inbreeding and entitlement on show for all to see.
A total lack of empathy, common sense or contrition.
But looking at his back catalogue of dubious associates, friends and business dealings, we should not be surprised.
Vive la revolution!  | | | |
| Already it doesn`t sound good... on 09:12 - Nov 17 with 156 views | ROTTWEILERS |
What is the specific accusation made against him? | |
| |
| Already it doesn`t sound good... on 09:19 - Nov 17 with 154 views | Lala |
Firstly Rotty I think the incident with this girl just highlights his involvement with Epstein and indulging on a sexual level with young girls.
What that leads to is his alleged involvement in orgies where underage girls were groomed, procured or trafficked for sexual relations with Epstein and his cohorts. That’s what Epstein was charged with and so Andrews association within that world looks very telling.
It all rests with the FBI and their appetite to investigate much further I would imagine. [Post edited 17 Nov 2019 9:21]
| |
| |
| Already it doesn`t sound good... on 09:35 - Nov 17 with 144 views | ROTTWEILERS |
Thanks lala, I wasn't fully aware of the story. Not looking good for him then is it?
Edit - although there are quite a few inferences needed to reach a conclusion of criminal behaviour on his part.
He'd have been better off coming out to say he did shag her - accepting that, like alot of men, he misused power and status to get his end away but in hindsight those girls were vulnerable. Assuming nobody got assaulted or raped - If he were a rock star, he'd be bragging about it. [Post edited 17 Nov 2019 9:54]
| |
| |
| Already it doesn`t sound good... on 11:10 - Nov 17 with 124 views | Lala |
Well to be fair that’s how the judge summed up Oystons case if you read the file as she wasn’t underage either 🤔
Yes, there is no concrete evidence, that we know of, at this point, relating to underage sex and trafficking etc, but what the FBI know or don’t know is anyone’s guess. It’s how much or little he will comply with the FBI’s investigation that is also an issue being raised. | |
| |
| Already it doesn`t sound good... on 11:18 - Nov 17 with 121 views | ROTTWEILERS |
I did say 'assuming nobody got raped'
It's scummy behaviour but I'm not seeing much evidence that points towards criminality on his part. | |
| |
| Already it doesn`t sound good... on 11:37 - Nov 17 with 117 views | Lala |
Nope and at this point in time you’re spot on.
I think in these high profile cases what comes to light will depend on who is backing you and who is against you. In that respect I think Andrew needn’t worry about a criminal conviction, just a totally tarnished reputation based on his very close association with trafficking paedophiles and almost certain involvement in less than moral behaviour.
Anyway, fruit toast and coffee awaits | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
