HALL RIGHT NOW: Why PFC owe Portpin absolutely nothing...
Monday, 1st Oct 2012 15:26 by Micah Hall
On Friday 17th February 2012 Justice Norris appointed Trevor Birch as Pompey's administrator. In doing so he questioned why Portpin held a debenture over Pompey at all. It's a very good question.
A debenture is just a mortgage by another name. Portpin loaned Pompey £6m on October 6th 2009. They took a charge on Fratton Park for £7m, which is the oft referred to value in the Land Registry. (That doesn't mean it's worth £7m, it just means it secured up to £7m of loans). Source: Companies House
In January 2010 Portpin took a further charge on "all the assets, monies and enterprise of Portsmouth Football Club" to the value of £17m, so effectively Portpin were claiming to have loaned a further £11m in November and December. Source: Companies House
For the purposes of this article, I'm not going to dispute that, as no one has ever produced audited accounts to prove it one way or the other.
It would seem to me the biggest problem with the charge comes when Portpin 'bought' Pompey out of administration in October 2010. It's complicated so stick with me.
At that time, Pompey were in administration and for sale.
Portpin bought Pompey from administration in October 2010 and my understanding is paid for the club by swapping it for their debenture. The alternative would be Portpin would have been given the club for free. In other words, it's a bit like you not paying your mortgage (in this case PFC hasn't kept up its loan repayments) and the bank (in this case Portpin) takes your house in return.
Portpin had already taken (or in effect been paid back by PFC) £4m in February 2010, and Andrew Andronikou agreed with representatives from the Pompey Virtual Alliance at a meeting in April 2010 that this needed to be deducted from the £17m debenture, leaving "around £12.8m, call it £13m" to quote Andronikou.
So Portpin effectively swapped their debenture on Portsmouth City Football Club Ltd for the assets of PCFC Ltd, ie they repossessed it. So what assets did PCFC Ltd have, what was it worth?
Well, Fratton Park at their security valuation of £7m – Source: Title Number: HP375034.
He also inherited the debt from Miland Property to PFC2010 Ltd of around £4m - this was the entry in the books which Miland should have, but did not, pay for the land around the ground. Any outstanding debt is an asset, and there is an ongoing investigation into this transaction by Baker Tilly aimed at recovering the money for PFC2010 Ltd.
After paying the CVA there was a further £2m of excess parachute payments. This is an asset of the new company.
All player contracts are an asset of the new company. Let’s be ultra-conservative here and value them at £2m. This doesn't include possible transfer fees.
Then add in £500,000 for the fixtures and fittings of Fratton Park, logo, intellectual property, TV rights payments - again an ultra-conservative valuation. I've even decided to omit the revenue from 10,000 season tickets, running into millions, from this equation.
So add that up. Assets of PFC2010 Ltd in October 2010 were conservatively around £15.5m.
So in return for a charge of £13m, Andrew Andronikou it appears sold all the assets of Portsmouth City Football Club Ltd to Portpin's new company, PFC 2010 Ltd in return for the debenture.
The question then, is if the value of the assets (£15.5m) exceeded the value of the charge, (£13m), why would there still be a charge of £17m? Surely, Portpin should have been paying an extra £2.5m cash to own PFC 2010 Ltd, not keeping £17m of secured debt?
Roll forward to January 26th 2011, and the Transfer of fixed and floating charge of 7th January 2010 to PFC2010 Ltd. Source Companies House.
The whole £17m Portpin charge which should, in my view, no longer exist, is transferred from oldco, (PCFC Ltd) to newco, (PFC2010 Ltd) by Andrew Andronikou, and accepted by whoever on the board of PFC 2010 Ltd thought accepting £17m of debt for apparently nothing was a good idea. The board of PFC 2010 Ltd at the time included Deepak Chainrai and Levi Kushnir, who coincidentally are directors of Portpin. No doubt they excused themselves from the transaction owing to the apparent conflict of interest.
So what we have here is the equivalent of a bank repossessing your house, selling it for above market value and then telling you that you still owe them the entire amount of the mortgage which is now secured on your new house.
As the tale winds on it becomes more inexplicable. CSI Ltd bought Pompey, and when CSI was put into administration, by Portpin, Portpin created a new charge of £17m on CSI Ltd, while maintaining the old one on PFC 2010 Ltd. Source: Companies House
It's no wonder the judge was perplexed. I'm perplexed. So the new deal seems to be that the Football League are allowing Portpin only £5m of secured debt, which is still not bad considering PFC apparently don't owe them anything.
If you look back at the October 2010 transaction in the light of the Football League’s ruling, the only way it makes sense is if PCFC Ltd had no assets at all, no stadium, players, contracts etc. But if that is true, how can you transfer secured debt to a company with no assets? Either PCFC Ltd had enough assets to pay off the charge when Portpin took us out of administration, or no assets at all and therefore nothing to secure the new charge in January 2011.
Portpin have agreed to pay unsecured creditors of PFC 2010 Ltd and PCFC Ltd a total of £500,000. Now CSI Ltd are owed £10m....by PFC 2010 Ltd, in return for all those players CSI bought that PFC couldn’t afford.
As creditors of newco, CSI get 2p in the pound as opposed to £0.04p in the pound for oldco. So of that £500k, CSI will get £200,000. Portpin are the secured creditors of CSI. So that £200k will go from Portpin to CSI to Portpin again.
Moreover, Portpin have made an offer to pay the creditors, but that offer apparently includes no new money coming into the club, just old debt. So who will pay the £500k? Portsmouth Football Club apparently. Once we pay the £500k from our revenues to our creditors it will, if Portpin's bid is correct, go down in the books as a debt PFC owes to....Portpin.
So the net effect will be that in paying CSI £200k PFC will be giving £200k to Portpin but still owe them £500k plus interest.
All of the above is complex and for all I know is entirely legal and above board. The forthcoming Baker Tilly report should answer at least part of that question.
Portpin's PR company was contacted and given the opportunity to review, comment upon and correct any inaccuracies in this article. A spokesman said: 'Portpin decline to comment on this story.'
The views of Micah Hall are his own and don't necessarily reflect the editorial view of pompey-fans.com
The Pompey Supporters' Trust is still seeking pledges from Pompey fans to back their bid. Information can be found here
Photo: Action Images
Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.
You need to login in order to post your comments
Blogs 31 bloggers
Letters from Wiltshire #48 by wessex_exile
“And now the end is near, and so we face the final curtain…regrets, we’ve had a few, but then again, too few to mention”. Not quite right Paul Anka, probably more than a few, but otherwise a fair assessment of where the U’s are today. It’ll be interesting to see how we perform with the relegation monkey finally off their back – I’m not expecting miracles, particularly with Tranmere needing at least a point to guarantee making the play-offs, but they’ll certainly be more nervous than we will be, so can we make that count? This will be my last blog of the season, and not yet sure what I may or may not do for next season, but suggestions are always welcome.
Letters from Wiltshire #47 by wessex_exile
Here we are, at the penultimate game of the season, and our last game in front of the cardboard U’s faithful at the JobServe. It has been a long, difficult, and definitely strange season, which frankly I’ll be glad to see the back of. That’ll we’ll be here again in August is definitely going to be something to celebrate, but I suspect we’re facing a summer of significant rebuilding both on the pitch, and possibly off it too. I won’t be the only one, but the biggest oddity for me has been being able to watch every single game – not always easy viewing, but something I’ve never done before, and probably never will again. But it doesn’t really make up for not being there in person, the long train journey away-days, meeting fellow U’s and other supporters, and of course sharing a beer or three. Fingers-crossed we can return to the terraces in 2021/22.
Letters from Wiltshire #46 by wessex_exile
That was quite a week for us all then. In the space of four short but remarkably tense days we have gone from having to take shoes and socks off to check how many more points we need to guarantee survival, or whether we would even achieve it, to breathing a huge sigh of relief knowing we’re almost there. But close of play this afternoon, whether by our own actions or the failure of others, I am sure survival will be confirmed. Of course, Tuesday night not only all but guaranteed it, it also virtually condemned local rivals Southend United to non-league football for the foreseeable. Looking at the host of fully professional former football league sides currently battling it out for the two promotion slots out of the National league (including Hartlepool, Torquay, Stockport, Wrexham, Chesterfield and Notts County), it is not going to be a walk in the park for Southend to return any day soon.
Letters from Wiltshire #45 by wessex_exile
Tonight, Colchester United face Southend United in what may not necessarily be the most important game of our respective histories (though it’s certainly very close), but is almost certainly the most important Essex derby ever. However this season pans out, by the end of it there’ll either be only one team in Essex, or worst case scenario, none at all. If the U’s win, then Southend will be 9pts behind with just three games to go, and a minimum of a -12 goal difference to overturn if they want to overtake us. Certainly mathematically possible, but that would rely on a remarkable turnaround in their form, form that they’ve shown precious little sign of achieving so far this season. The stalking horse is Grimsby, with their game in hand, who have rather belatedly shown an improvement in form, so their match against automatic promotion chasing Morecambe tonight is equally important, particularly if we want to avoid the unthinkable, with both Essex clubs dropping out of the league.
Letters from Wiltshire #44 by wessex_exile
So here we are, as the nation mourns the passing of His Royal Highness, Duke of Edinburgh, the U’s face the first of two season-defining moments, with our late kick-off match at home to Walsall. Before then, no doubt many will have been focused on events elsewhere, not least the early kick-offs for Grimsby (at home to promotion-chasing Bolton Wanderers), and particularly Essex rivals Southend United, who faced a tricky visit to Exeter City – still very much in the hunt for at least a play-off spot. As I finalise this blog, I know that Grimsby have beaten Bolton 2-1, and Southend earned a credible 0-0 draw in the West Country. More to the point, the U’s will know this too. Whilst I can’t help but feel that will ought to be to our advantage, it surely must also put additional pressure on a squad whose confidence is paper-thin. We must hope that Hayden Mullins, assisted by Paul Tisdale, get their heads right, and send the lads out this evening fired up with self-belief.