| £12 million a year 08:41 - Sep 18 with 4622 views | raynor94 |
The estimated cost of adding another 36 snouts to the trough at the assembly.
Drakeford backed by Plaid ushering this through, at least the Tories opposed this on cost grounds |  |
| |  |
| £12 million a year on 17:02 - Sep 21 with 845 views | felixstowe_jack |
| £12 million a year on 16:44 - Sep 21 by Kilkennyjack |
Well said.
Both Johnson and Truss have debased it and removed any pretence that its a serious law making institution.
Its the establishment looking after their own.
Talking of which i wonder how Lady Charlotte Owen is getting along…?
Shameful stuff by the failed hack. |
Wonder how the so called comedian Ed Miliband was championing for supporting Labour is getting on. |  |
| |
| £12 million a year on 17:22 - Sep 21 with 823 views | Badgeman |
| £12 million a year on 16:33 - Sep 21 by SullutaCreturned |
For comparison, the Westminster budget is vastly more massive than the Senedd's. The Senedd spends 20 billion but Westminster spends 1,189 billion which is nearly 60 times more.
Financially speaking any Westminster cock ups will always be enormous compared to Welsh government financial stupidity.
While Wales is having an extra 36 politicians foisted on us Westminster is actually cutting politicians. Just for comparison.
The whataboutery is staggering, we shouldn't be pointing fingers at people who aren't spending Welsh money badly but we should be pointing them at those who are! |
These politicians aren’t being foisted upon us, the country voted for it.
It’s not whataboutism to question people’s hypocrisy. When people are screaming blue murder over Labour spending £12million on something they said they would, but are making dick jokes about the Tories blowing a £30bn hole in the economy because of an uncosted budget, it’s not really about the money. |  |
| |
| £12 million a year on 17:28 - Sep 21 with 815 views | Kilkennyjack |
| £12 million a year on 17:02 - Sep 21 by felixstowe_jack |
Wonder how the so called comedian Ed Miliband was championing for supporting Labour is getting on. |
Ed Miliband is a comedian ? |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| £12 million a year on 17:29 - Sep 21 with 817 views | Badgeman |
| £12 million a year on 17:02 - Sep 21 by felixstowe_jack |
Wonder how the so called comedian Ed Miliband was championing for supporting Labour is getting on. |
This post from felix is an indicator of just how vile he and his ilk are.
Instead of discussing the matter at hand, he’s decided to weaponise the grief of the sexual assault victims of Russell brand in an attempt to smear Ed Miliband by association because he shared an interview with him once as long as eight years ago.
Do us all a favour and stay away from women Felix. You clearly can’t be trusted not to exploit their grief if it becomes convenient. | |
| |
| £12 million a year on 19:56 - Sep 21 with 786 views | Gwyn737 |
| £12 million a year on 17:02 - Sep 21 by felixstowe_jack |
Wonder how the so called comedian Ed Miliband was championing for supporting Labour is getting on. |
Pretty poor, that. | | | |
| £12 million a year on 21:50 - Sep 21 with 747 views | Badgeman |
| £12 million a year on 19:56 - Sep 21 by Gwyn737 |
Pretty poor, that. |
Shameful. | |
| |
| £12 million a year on 07:34 - Sep 22 with 697 views | felixstowe_jack |
| £12 million a year on 17:29 - Sep 21 by Badgeman |
This post from felix is an indicator of just how vile he and his ilk are.
Instead of discussing the matter at hand, he’s decided to weaponise the grief of the sexual assault victims of Russell brand in an attempt to smear Ed Miliband by association because he shared an interview with him once as long as eight years ago.
Do us all a favour and stay away from women Felix. You clearly can’t be trusted not to exploit their grief if it becomes convenient. |
You are entitled to your opinion but try not to resort to personal insults. Funnily enough I never mentioned any name but you were more than willing to exploit it for your political views.
Does that prove how nasty and vile the far left have become. [Post edited 22 Sep 2023 7:34]
| |
| |
| £12 million a year on 08:21 - Sep 22 with 691 views | Badgeman |
| £12 million a year on 07:34 - Sep 22 by felixstowe_jack |
You are entitled to your opinion but try not to resort to personal insults. Funnily enough I never mentioned any name but you were more than willing to exploit it for your political views.
Does that prove how nasty and vile the far left have become. [Post edited 22 Sep 2023 7:34]
|
You must think everyone’s as thick and nasty as you.
What relevance does Ed Miliband’s interview with Russell Brand have to do with anything being discussed in this thread? | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| £12 million a year on 08:43 - Sep 22 with 689 views | felixstowe_jack |
| £12 million a year on 08:21 - Sep 22 by Badgeman |
You must think everyone’s as thick and nasty as you.
What relevance does Ed Miliband’s interview with Russell Brand have to do with anything being discussed in this thread? |
Oh dear looks like the nasty left can't take any criticism
You do know you have broken the rules of posting a name that the moderators have asked people not to.
That rather proves you are Th**k or can't read. | |
| |
| £12 million a year on 10:27 - Sep 22 with 674 views | Badgeman |
| £12 million a year on 08:43 - Sep 22 by felixstowe_jack |
Oh dear looks like the nasty left can't take any criticism
You do know you have broken the rules of posting a name that the moderators have asked people not to.
That rather proves you are Th**k or can't read. |
What criticism do you think you were making when you randomly brought up Ed Miliband being interviewed by Russell Brand on a thread that had nothing to do with either?
What name? What moderators? Do you mean Russell Brand? You are the one who brought him into this conversation you sack of giblets. You’re a fantastic advert for conservatives fair play. | |
| |
| £12 million a year on 16:47 - Sep 22 with 614 views | SullutaCreturned |
| £12 million a year on 08:21 - Sep 22 by Badgeman |
You must think everyone’s as thick and nasty as you.
What relevance does Ed Miliband’s interview with Russell Brand have to do with anything being discussed in this thread? |
well we were discussing the Welsh government so whay did Westminster have to do with it?
PS, what you call hypocrisy is only so if anyone supported what Truss did and I don't think I've seen anyone say truss did a good thing but she got plenty of criticism here, when we were discussing her and Westminster. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.