By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Star! Bar on green dragon lane is miles ahead. Just off wind street. Yummy garden next to the wig n pen on St helens is good especially if you order off the Chinese menu
I certainly didn't imply that and, from what I have seen, neither does the website that I linked. Why not take a look at the website instead of writing off alternative explanations as the fantasies of the mentally impaired ?
Too few people in the UK have questioned the official story as to the perpetrators of 7/7 and the reasons behind it. There are so many holes in the narrative that we were fed, that just like 9/11, it is amazing that it is still so widely accepted as being truthful and accurate.
Just a few examples here. There is extensive footage of the alleged bombers in London the month before, supposedly checking out their targets. No footage of them on 7/7 itself has ever been released despite the huge number of surveillance cameras that would have caught them if the official story were true. The only still shot ever released of them entering the station in Luton is quite obviously photoshopped. The train that they were supposed to have caught from Luton to King's Cross was in fact cancelled. The next train would have got them to London only a few minutes before the bombs were detonated, not allowing them sufficient time to have been at the scenes of the crimes. The coincidence that British security forces were running an almost identical emergency scenario to the events that actually took place on the same day is outrageous and fully documented if you care to look. There is a photograph (although it seems to be difficult to find now) of the internal damage to one of the tube trains which shows that the direction of the blast was clearly upwards, originating from beneath the floor of the train. The bomb could not have been carried by a passenger. The bus in Tavistock square was diverted from its normal route by the police for no adequately explained reason, arguably because that is where the detonation was planned to occur. The alleged perpetrators were shot and killed by armed police in Canary Wharf the same day before they had any chance of claiming they were set up. The Brazilian guy that was shot dead in Stockwell tube station the following week is reported to have had prior knowledge of "modifications" being made to tube trains in the weeks before 7/7. The event took place at the same time as a G7 summit in Edinburgh. High on the summit's agenda was the subject of writing off Third World debt. Of course, that was shelved after the attacks, as the pressing issue of "The War on Terror" took centre stage.
With the large weight of evidence that the official story is tissue thin, it suggests to me that Blair et al wanted their own mini 9/11 so they could advance their agenda of "reorganising" the Arab world.
Here is a link to an interesting website dedicated to trying to get to the truth about 7/7 and to expose its real perpetrators.
I knew about the bandana at Shanksville. I thought the passport was on the street in New York. Maybe they found two passports capable of surviving a 500 knot plane wreck with its associated fireball. Weird is not the word I would use to describe it, more like unbelievable and incredible in the literal senses of the words. When you look at ludicrous details such as this, it's amazing that any of us bought the story in the first place. Only goes to show that you can fool all the people all the time if you scare the shits out of them, at least for a while. I think that "while" has expired....
Yes I did Bryn. As I said, there are many clues that only seem to add up one way that makes any sense. The official narrative makes no sense at all. The put options on United and American airlines that you referred to are yet another piece of damning evidence about pre-planning and foreknowledge. Doubters often say that with the number of people that must have been involved in planning the attacks that someone would have leaked the plan. Well, there were up to 400,000 people involved in the Manhattan Project and that was successfully kept top secret (apart from the fact that the Russians knew about it, of course.)
One thing I forgot to mention about Lucky Larry Silverstien is that in the contract to purchase the WTC complex was a condition that he would have the rights to rebuild on the site should the buildings ever be demolished. So not only did he get a massive payout, but he got to build the ironically named "Freedom Tower" at ground zero. He also got the city of New York to donate $100 million to the construction costs! As per my Arctic Monkeys reference "Just give him half a chance I bet he'll rob you if he can."
On the Shanksville PA site where Flight 93 allegedly crashed, Somerset County Coroner Wally Miller who was called to the crashsite basically said that there was nothing for him to do as there were no body parts and no blood (oh, and no luggage and very little wreckage.) That presents the very disturbing question, if that wasn't Flight 93, what did they do with the real Flight 93 and all of its passengers ? That question can be asked about the other three planes too.
The further you go down this rabbit hole, the more dastardly and callous it all becomes. Mass murder justifying even more mass murder. I hope that one day the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth will be told. Unfortunately, nearly all of those responsible will probably be dead by then and will never have to face their accusers or the American people.
As this comes up to twenty years since the event, it occurred to me that an entire generation of Muslim kids has grown up that have never known anything but the hatred and prejudice that has been directed at them which was a major part of the object of this exercise. Why wouldn't those kids hate the West ? Brilliant, a self perpetuating foe has been created where there was none. You can only imagine the logic: "Shit! nobody's afraid of Commies since the Soviet Union fell apart. What the fck are we going to spend all this defence money on ? I know, let's get everyone shit scared of Muslims. We would be able to control or even invade their countries! Yeah, but we need to outrage and terrify the American public. We need a new Pearl Harbor." Mission accomplished.....
There are so many fallacies and inconsistencies in the official narrative that I am amazed that anyone still believes any of it. There are many first hand witnesses that heard and/or were injured by explosions in the basements of the Twin Towers before any plane had struck them. This is backed up by data from local seismic monitoring stations.
Anyone that still believes that you could crash a 200 ton aluminium plane carrying a few thousand gallons of aviation fuel into a half million ton steel and concrete building, even at a few hundred miles per hour, and cause it to collapse with almost perfect symmetry at near freefall acceleration, really does not have much of a grasp of physics.
There are many first responders (many of whom are now suffering respiratory illnesses) who reported seeing molten steel in the debris. That would require temperatures of over 1000 degrees Celsius MORE than would be possible by igniting the contents of an office building with aviation fuel.
Larry Silverstien bought the entire WTC complex for a relative pittance from the Port Authority of New York who were desperate to offload it as much of the buildings was fireproofed using asbestos. It was going to cost close to $1 billion to bring the buildings up to code. Silverstien amended the insurance policy for the WTC to include acts of terrorism earlier in 2001. He successfully claimed that, as two planes struck the buildings, it was two separate attacks and was awarded a double payout totalling $4.5 billion. Not bad for his original investment of $750 million on which he had only made a small downpayment. What a scummy man.
As for the Pentagon, over thirty surveillance cameras were pointed at the side of the building that was hit, yet no footage of anything actually striking it has ever been released. Strange that whatever did strike the building hit the budget analysts offices where on September 10th Donald Rumsfeld had announced that $2.3 trillion was missing from the Pentagon budget (if you read my previous post, we know that this figure is now $21 trillion.) Nobody seemed to ever mention this again after what happened the following day. Handy, to say the least.
These are just a few of the many dots which can only be joined up one way that I can see. It killed so many birds with one stone for the Neocons and their cronies, not to mention 3000 innocent people and millions more due to the phoney "War on Terror" that was perpetrated as a result of this hideous charade. Apologies if I seem to be belabouring the point but, along with Berlin wall coming down, 9/11 was the most world changing event that has happened in my lifetime. I could go on for thousands more words on the subject but here James Corbett puts it succinctly in under five minutes.
Part of the key with Iran is not technically oil but gas. The discovery of the South Pars gasfield, the largest reserves of natural gas ever discovered, is behind much of the recent skulduggery. Syria is central to the plan to bring the gas to the European market hence the "necessity" to bring that country to its knees while blaming everyone but the actual culprits. These two links are informative.
There has to be some incident, usually involving the death of innocent Americans, before the US public will support aggressive action against another country or organisation, real or otherwise. Here's the mother of them all (Pearl Harbor not withstanding) and for those who can't be bothered to follow the link, the District Attorney for the Southern District of New York has accepted a 52 page petition from a lawyers committee to convene a Grand Jury to examine the evidence in the petition. The petition contains an enormous weight of evidence that all of the WTC buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. As a Grand Jury operates behind closed doors, I am skeptical that we will ever see the true outcome of this. The changes that have taken place in the world and particularly the US as a result of 9/11 are undeniable. If the citizens of the US ever have the proof that this was all perpetrated by elements within the US government, there would likely be an outpouring of disillusioned people determined to exercise their second amendment rights. The powers that be will not let that happen. Here is a link to the acceptance of that petition.
If you have the time to read the petition itself, the evidence looks pretty overwhelming and hopefully the jury members will look at this without star spangled spectacles.
This is huge news. Has anybody seen anything in the press or on the TV about it ? Nah, it doesn't fit with the program of feeding us what we "need to know." Kind of like the $21 trillion (yes trillion, not billion) unaccountable in the Pentagon budget after a recent audit.
In 2013 I read an article about ownership and top management of US media corporations. Now I'm not sure whether the purpose of the article was Anti Semitic, Pro Arab or just to point out an extraordinary disparity. However propagandist the motive might have been, the information contained therein was easily verifiable. Although this information is now six years old, given the distribution of the results, I would be surprised if it had changed substantially.
The categories in top management were as follows: President, CEO, Founder, Owner, VP and Chairman. The results were that approximately 88% were Jewish,10% White/Non Jewish and 2% were Non White/Non Jewish. Given the relative proportions in the US population of these three groups, this is glaringly disproportionate. It also highlights how little influence and representation African Americans have in the US media.
Obviously, not all of those in the Jewish group are necessarily pro Israel, but I think it would be reasonable to assume that many are. The companies cited have a massive influence on the reporting and portrayal of world events. I am only referring to the US media although one would think that they have far more global reach than those of less influential countries.
My question is, how can we expect to receive an evenhanded view of world events and particularly the Middle East, if the information we are being fed cannot realistically be expected to be unbiased ? Apologies if my pointing this out, or even being rather concerned by it, satisfies any of the criteria currently laid down for Anti Semitism.
The 47 companies cited in the article are listed below: 20th Century Fox ABC Kids & Family ABC News Associated Press CBS News CNN News Columbia Pictures Comcast Comedy Central Cosmopolitan Discovery Network Disney Dreamworks Dreamworks Animation ESPN Sports Facebook Fox News Google HBO Huffington Post Hulu Imagine Entertainment LA Times LucasArts Marvel MGM Miramax MSNBC MTV NBC Entertainment New York Post New York Times Nickelodeon Paramount PIXAR Reader's Digest Reuters The Atlantic Time Inc Touchstone Universal Studios USA Today Wall Street Journal Warner Brothers Washington Post Yahoo Youtube
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
