Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Media B011ocks 10:38 - Jul 17 with 1542 viewsBerber

https://tbrfootball.com/report-southampton-want-40m-fee-for-arsenal-target-walke

“Southampton want £40m”

Everyone and their grandma knows that Spuds have a £30m buy back clause, so how anyone thinks we would state £40m is absolute spaff. Spurs could buy back, pocket £10m, and Levy isn’t going to turn that down is he?
0
Media B011ocks on 10:42 - Jul 17 with 1529 viewsPatfromPoole

If Spurs do have a buy-back clause on KWP, then spending £20m on the (admittedly promising) Boro RB Spence seems rather an odd thing to do.

Poll: Does anybody think Saints can get promoted this season?

0
Media B011ocks on 11:41 - Jul 17 with 1461 viewsElijahK

Yeah but there’s always little rules/regulations as part of buy back clauses that don’t always get publicly published, as in some deals in the past, of a team pod £5mil then the buy back clause could be removed, or that if the buy back clause was used then that player couldn’t be sold within the next season etc…
As I’m not saying that the article you’ve posted is true, but there’s loads of little things in contracts and buyback clauses that can lead to things like this actually happening

Poll: Should the football be on again next weekend

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024