Clucas & J Ayew 12:30 - Aug 8 with 1952 views | Al_Bundy | Are they both being very clever here and pricing themselves out of permanent moves by their high wage demands in favour of a loan move and keep their options open. Can't see Wolves taking Clucas to be honest as at best he would be a squad player. | | | | |
Clucas & J Ayew on 12:36 - Aug 8 with 1881 views | omarjack | Why do they want to keep their options open? It's not like (Especially Ayew) will ever be wanted back here again. | |
| |
Clucas & J Ayew on 15:06 - Aug 8 with 1493 views | sP7qupUf | Ayew will have to be careful with his working visa. | | | |
Clucas & J Ayew on 15:18 - Aug 8 with 1412 views | Wingstandwood | My take? Mercenary footballers know they are able to exert emotional blackmail of 'damned-if-you-don't' consequence(s) upon cost cutting/rebudgeting football clubs! I would not be surprised in the slightest if he and other(s) leave on a loan deal and without any multi-million Pound transfer money being paid to SCFC. | |
| |
Clucas & J Ayew on 16:43 - Aug 8 with 1228 views | jackjackjackjack | I thought one of the reasons Ayew isn't going to Fulham is that we value him at £16m, which I doubt anyone would pay. edit: from BBC website: "Fulham had an offer of £8m rejected for him in June, and it is thought the Swans value him at around twice that figure." Madness, if true. [Post edited 8 Aug 2018 17:30]
| |
| |
Clucas & J Ayew on 17:05 - Aug 8 with 1126 views | longlostjack |
Clucas & J Ayew on 16:43 - Aug 8 by jackjackjackjack | I thought one of the reasons Ayew isn't going to Fulham is that we value him at £16m, which I doubt anyone would pay. edit: from BBC website: "Fulham had an offer of £8m rejected for him in June, and it is thought the Swans value him at around twice that figure." Madness, if true. [Post edited 8 Aug 2018 17:30]
|
Clucas and Jordan Ayew are represented by the same agency. The same agency that represents Grimes and got Routledge a good contract. Trivial fact perhaps - but I just found it interesting. | |
| |
Clucas & J Ayew on 18:25 - Aug 8 with 901 views | phact0rri |
Clucas & J Ayew on 16:43 - Aug 8 by jackjackjackjack | I thought one of the reasons Ayew isn't going to Fulham is that we value him at £16m, which I doubt anyone would pay. edit: from BBC website: "Fulham had an offer of £8m rejected for him in June, and it is thought the Swans value him at around twice that figure." Madness, if true. [Post edited 8 Aug 2018 17:30]
|
I would hope to get more than £8 for him though, £10-12 would probably be good business judging the markets and his skill level I'd imagine. I just hope we find a way to off load Ayew. Clucas, has shown glimmers but if he's standing in the way of getting that Woods deal through, c'est la vie. | |
| |
Clucas & J Ayew on 18:37 - Aug 8 with 844 views | awayjack |
Clucas & J Ayew on 18:25 - Aug 8 by phact0rri | I would hope to get more than £8 for him though, £10-12 would probably be good business judging the markets and his skill level I'd imagine. I just hope we find a way to off load Ayew. Clucas, has shown glimmers but if he's standing in the way of getting that Woods deal through, c'est la vie. |
We're good at selling players below market value. | | | |
Clucas & J Ayew on 18:38 - Aug 8 with 840 views | omarjack |
Clucas & J Ayew on 18:37 - Aug 8 by awayjack | We're good at selling players below market value. |
And buying at double the value.. | |
| |
| |