| Piers this morning 08:56 - Apr 16 with 8867 views | raynor94 |
Interviewing Hancock, who admits 15000 people are arriving daily through Heathrow, from places like New York and Italy, and don't get tested.
Just allowed to mingle, truly staggering! |  |
| |  |
| Piers this morning on 18:18 - Apr 17 with 857 views | waynekerr55 |
| Piers this morning on 13:30 - Apr 17 by JackSomething |
Hancock queried footballers because they're an easy target for the easily influenced in our society. Typical politics of today. You notice he didn't query the often multi-millionaire/billionaire owners of football clubs?
Also, did it escape your attention that a lot of footballers were trying to organise something to ensure any wages they sacrificed would be spent appropriately, not kept by the clubs or their owners? The majority of them don't trust the owners an inch and who can blame them?
Can't stand Morgan even when his ire is actually being directed at people who deserve it, which is unlike his usual shtick, so I'm not going to defend him. |
Eerily quiet too about the likes of Branson, Green and, dare I say it, Somerset Investments (or whatever the haunted pencil's investment arm is called) |  |
| |
| Piers this morning on 18:53 - Apr 17 with 823 views | JackSomething |
| Piers this morning on 18:18 - Apr 17 by waynekerr55 |
Eerily quiet too about the likes of Branson, Green and, dare I say it, Somerset Investments (or whatever the haunted pencil's investment arm is called) |
Exactly and Nige's post is proof that it works very well on at least some people. If there's one thing politicians of all stripes are good at these days, it's shifting focus away from matters that they don't want discussed. Helped by a mostly pathetic media. |  |
| You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help. |
| |
| Piers this morning on 00:02 - Apr 18 with 774 views | Jack123 |
| Piers this morning on 12:16 - Apr 17 by DJack |
Hi mate, could you please explain why inyour eyes thearticle is " totally insignificant". |
Sorry, I shouldn't try to comment, when absolutely arseholed , made perfect sense at the time, but embarrassing when you wake up.. |  |
| |
| Piers this morning on 00:07 - Apr 18 with 762 views | Swanjaxs |
| Piers this morning on 00:02 - Apr 18 by Jack123 |
Sorry, I shouldn't try to comment, when absolutely arseholed , made perfect sense at the time, but embarrassing when you wake up.. |
Never feel embarrassed mate, PS is all about opinions.
The biggest dafties that post on here are stone cold sober when they contribute 🙈 |  |
| |
| Piers this morning on 00:33 - Apr 18 with 734 views | DJack |
| Piers this morning on 00:02 - Apr 18 by Jack123 |
Sorry, I shouldn't try to comment, when absolutely arseholed , made perfect sense at the time, but embarrassing when you wake up.. |
We've all been there and will again. Some thoughts from me...
If China engineered it why did they give away it's genome so early. In fact in recent years they have defied international medical convention by not giving out samples of other diseases that started(or were first noticed) in China. The whole bloody world is sequencing/testing this virus if it appeared dodgy someone would have already piped up.
To create and release an engineered virus , at best, would be considered as an act of bio-terrorism and very possibly called an act of war by many nations - the risk would be too great for China.
An accidental release is possible but very unlikely as the lab is classed as BSL 4, Bio-Security Level 4 - highest level of threat and handling security. Accidents can happen but they are factored into their measures and the staff are very aware that if they balls-up it is their lives and that of their families most at risk. That said in the past the yanks have sent live virus out to academia by mistake - oops!
Edit as for some reason put BSL 1, I probably thinking of the fact that Russia had asked that the levels were switched round but it did not happen [Post edited 18 Apr 2020 1:36]
|  |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.