| FFP 10:54 - Dec 24 with 1687 views | shandyjack |
Bournemouth have been charged with breaching FFP last season and face a transfer embargo, would be good if that was enforced before Jan 1st |  |
| |  |
| FFP on 11:46 - Dec 24 with 1504 views | Dan_Swan |
Not sure if the Football League has any jurisdiction over Premier League clubs, I believe they can only enforce punishments when a club ends up back in the Football League. |  |
| Still following Dr's orders! |
| |
| FFP on 11:55 - Dec 24 with 1447 views | Dewi1jack |
Is this a different Ballmuff to the one some people on PS have been wa**ing themselves into a coma over?
Isn't the term "doing a Cardiff?" |  |
| If you wake up breathing, thats a good start to your day and you'll make many thousands of people envious. |
| |
| FFP on 12:02 - Dec 24 with 1392 views | Cooperman |
They will probably stay up regardless. |  |
| |
| FFP on 14:36 - Dec 24 with 1084 views | lovejuicejack |
| FFP on 12:02 - Dec 24 by Cooperman |
They will probably stay up regardless. |
Yeah this |  | | |
| FFP on 15:57 - Dec 24 with 932 views | monmouth |
These umbongos never seem to affect anybody that badly. Just stops them spunking even more on more shit players. |  |
| |
| FFP on 17:31 - Dec 24 with 780 views | blueytheblue |
| FFP on 11:46 - Dec 24 by Dan_Swan |
Not sure if the Football League has any jurisdiction over Premier League clubs, I believe they can only enforce punishments when a club ends up back in the Football League. |
Is mostly the correct answer.
They broke FL rule, not a Prem rule - having not been in the Prem at the time.
I believe it's the case the FA is the governing body, Prem and FL separate entities under the auspices of the FA.
So it there's any penalty applied it would almost certainly be a financial one. Unless there's already been a precedent that proves I'm talking bollocks again. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
