| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts 16:33 - Apr 21 with 1500 views | KeithHaynes |
Anyone heard anything more ? |  |
| |  |
| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts on 16:35 - Apr 21 with 1477 views | Whiterockin |
I haven't heard anything but Galbraith and Parker would be my thoughts. |  | | |
| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts on 16:36 - Apr 21 with 1474 views | Landore_Jack |
🚨 BREAKING:
Ethan Galbraith has rejected Swansea City’s initial contract offer after talks opened over a new deal, with the first proposal understood to have fallen well short of expectations.
(Tom Coleman) |  |
| |
| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts on 16:39 - Apr 21 with 1454 views | Whiterockin |
| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts on 16:36 - Apr 21 by Landore_Jack |
🚨 BREAKING:
Ethan Galbraith has rejected Swansea City’s initial contract offer after talks opened over a new deal, with the first proposal understood to have fallen well short of expectations.
(Tom Coleman) |
All about the buyout???? | | | |
| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts on 16:50 - Apr 21 with 1361 views | KeithHaynes |
| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts on 16:36 - Apr 21 by Landore_Jack |
🚨 BREAKING:
Ethan Galbraith has rejected Swansea City’s initial contract offer after talks opened over a new deal, with the first proposal understood to have fallen well short of expectations.
(Tom Coleman) |
He says breaking, so that’s been leaked to another source away from WOL.
Look at it two ways.
1. He doesn’t want to stay and fancy’s more cash elsewhere.
2. He wants to stay but wants more cash at Swansea.
That’s about it.
This post has been edited by an administrator | |
| |
| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts on 17:02 - Apr 21 with 1313 views | Whiterockin |
| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts on 16:50 - Apr 21 by KeithHaynes |
He says breaking, so that’s been leaked to another source away from WOL.
Look at it two ways.
1. He doesn’t want to stay and fancy’s more cash elsewhere.
2. He wants to stay but wants more cash at Swansea.
That’s about it.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
IMO it depends on the terms of the contract. I'm convinced Vipotnik had a buy out included, if its similar possibly the buyout is too high in relation to the salary, you want to make serious money on me I want some, a smaller transfer fee could could mean a larger sign on fee. Just my thoughts. | | | |
| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts on 17:09 - Apr 21 with 1272 views | KeithHaynes |
| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts on 17:02 - Apr 21 by Whiterockin |
IMO it depends on the terms of the contract. I'm convinced Vipotnik had a buy out included, if its similar possibly the buyout is too high in relation to the salary, you want to make serious money on me I want some, a smaller transfer fee could could mean a larger sign on fee. Just my thoughts. |
I think it’s all got too much drama attatched to it already. There are two players we know about in talks, there’s possibly more. The winner either way is the club because if both Galbraith and Vipotnik go it will pull the club far away from any debt by absolute millions. Around 35M ? remember though it’s in instalments.
Vipi had an 800k signing on fee by all accounts when he signed on, Galbraith cost one and a half million with around a 22% sell on fee. That’s superb business. | |
| |
| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts on 17:17 - Apr 21 with 1233 views | Whiterockin |
| Swans in talks to extend two players contracts on 17:09 - Apr 21 by KeithHaynes |
I think it’s all got too much drama attatched to it already. There are two players we know about in talks, there’s possibly more. The winner either way is the club because if both Galbraith and Vipotnik go it will pull the club far away from any debt by absolute millions. Around 35M ? remember though it’s in instalments.
Vipi had an 800k signing on fee by all accounts when he signed on, Galbraith cost one and a half million with around a 22% sell on fee. That’s superb business. |
Without a doubt. But with Galbraith if for example the club want a £15M buy out it would restrict the signing on fee available, if Galbraiths agents wanted that reduced to say £12M it would enable a larger signing on fee. All hypothetical figures but the principle would be the same and the club would still make a massive profit. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.