| Re: ML have not beaten any top 6 sides 16:45 - Sep 30 with 853 views | Swanfan1 |
there is more midtable to lower placed teams then top 6 sides
would you rather wanna beat all top 6 sides and lose to everyone else
or the opposite ?.
If we can this season be effective against midtable and lower teams, last season WBA beat us away, but this season we won comfortable 2-0
I have hope that we can beat them all, and should be the best of the rest again this season, maybe Southampton, Everton and West Ham is those who can cause us problems
other then that we should be able to do the job against Fulham, Sunderland, Crystal Palace, Norwich, and even the scums.. |  |
| |  |
| Re: ML have not beaten any top 6 sides on 17:08 - Sep 30 with 799 views | DafyddHuw |
"there is more midtable to lower placed teams then top 6 sides
would you rather wanna beat all top 6 sides and lose to everyone else
or the opposite ?"
Why does it have to be either/or? [Post edited 30 Sep 2013 17:27]
|  | | |
| Re: ML have not beaten any top 6 sides on 17:22 - Sep 30 with 767 views | Uxbridge |
Seem to remember us doing pretty well against Chelsea overall last year. |  |
| |
| Re: ML have not beaten any top 6 sides on 20:00 - Sep 30 with 681 views | JBT95 |
WE BEAT ARSENAL AT THEIR PLACE! |  | | |
| Re: ML have not beaten any top 6 sides on 20:25 - Sep 30 with 658 views | Dewi1jack |
"there is more midtable to lower placed teams then top 6 sides
would you rather wanna beat all top 6 sides and lose to everyone else
or the opposite ?."
Personally I'd rather beat both ends of the table.
Didn't we do some top 6/ 7 teams away last year? Sure we did a couple on the way to our European Tour.
Oh and Arsenal
Must have been watching the wrong Swansea  |  |
| If you wake up breathing, thats a good start to your day and you'll make many thousands of people envious. |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
