Forum | The Offside Rule by DWQPR

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

The Offside Rule 21:43 - Jan 7 with 2298 views

Can someone explain to me why the second Liverpool goal was allowed tonight against Wolves when Salah was clearly offside when the cross came over and yet a possible third Wolves goal was deemed offside. Totally confused.

Poll:

Where will Clive put QPR in his new season preview

The Offside Rule on 21:46 - Jan 7 with 2273 views

Northolt_Rs

Because they are LiVARpool of course!

Scooters, Tunes, Trainers and QPR.

The Offside Rule on 21:49 - Jan 7 with 2251 views

bosh67

The current offside rules are f@cking lunacy. Absolutely killing the game.

	Never knowingly right.
Poll:	How long before new signings become quivering wrecks of the players they were?

The Offside Rule on 21:51 - Jan 7 with 2234 views

traininvain

Also unsure why Wolves third goal was disallowed for offside. He looked onside and they’ve not even shown a replay with the lines to show how it was offside.

My biggest frustration with VAR is the lack of explanation in such situations. We’ve invested time to watch the game and deserve to know why a game changing decision has been made. But we’re treated with contempt instead. Even worse for those in the stadium.

The Offside Rule on 21:54 - Jan 7 with 2218 views

ManinBlack

It is being suggested the corner kicker for Wolves was offside as the ball went back to him to cross in again. He was off camera so we couldn't see this.

The Offside Rule on 21:54 - Jan 7 with 2215 views

eghamranger

Did you not see the Newcastle game.

Offsides all over the place

The Offside Rule on 22:13 - Jan 7 with 2155 views

Walnut

It could only have been for this second phase rule because Salah was clearly off when the ball was played.
The problem here (IMO) is the second phase law is bllx rather than the officials/ VAR not spotting player X was off or on.
Its an annoying and unnecessary change to the LotG.
PP?

The Offside Rule on 04:30 - Jan 8 with 1989 views

Loftgirl

Isn't it because it touched the defender on the way through? If he hadn't touched it, it would have been offside.

The Offside Rule on 05:02 - Jan 8 with 1978 views

CLAREMAN1995

The Offside Rule on 04:30 - Jan 8 by Loftgirl
Isn't it because it touched the defender on the way through? If he hadn't touched it, it would have been offside.

Once the defender headed it it became irrelevant that Salah was offside when the cross was delivered (superb finish though )
I have no clue why the Wolves winner did not stand its just bizzare at this stage.
I suspect the players are in the dark also to be honest

The Offside Rule on 09:17 - Jan 8 with 1820 views

traininvain

Total farce: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/jan/07/julen-lopetegui-tactical-camera

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread