| After that...are we safe. 22:39 - Dec 29 with 2212 views | qpr_1968 |
could'nt make it tonight, seemed like a strong team, again lacking goals.
but a great result against an inform team.
clean sheet as well. |  |
| |  |
| After that...are we safe. on 22:44 - Dec 29 with 2126 views | bosh67 |
Miles better. Unrecognisable from the Millwall game. If only we had a striker and a bit of luck. |  |
| |
| After that...are we safe. on 22:46 - Dec 29 with 2086 views | earthdweller |
This post was a joke right? It was nil nil. There are 21 games and qpr is 4 points from safety. How can anyone make an assessment? Some of the posts and comments in this forum have gotten more cringey over the years and seem to mirror the downhill slide of the club. [Post edited 29 Dec 2023 22:46]
| | | |
| After that...are we safe. on 22:48 - Dec 29 with 2056 views | qpr_1968 |
| After that...are we safe. on 22:46 - Dec 29 by earthdweller |
This post was a joke right? It was nil nil. There are 21 games and qpr is 4 points from safety. How can anyone make an assessment? Some of the posts and comments in this forum have gotten more cringey over the years and seem to mirror the downhill slide of the club. [Post edited 29 Dec 2023 22:46]
|
lighten up mate... | |
| |
| After that...are we safe. on 22:48 - Dec 29 with 2044 views | sdm1508 |
Really hope we have a striker lined up. Doesn't have to be a goal scorer as such. Weigh in with a few and actually hold up the ball, pose a problem and bring others into play. Dykes isn't doing either and Armstrong tonight has shown he hasn't really developed his game. Not making easy decisions and execution bad at times. One point building up play and misplaces a 5 yard pass. He is a impact sub at the moment when game is stretched. Doesn't have the technical ability to hold it up well | | | |
| After that...are we safe. on 22:53 - Dec 29 with 1989 views | FDC |
Four points from safety and haven't won in five, with the previously dead and buried Sheff Wed two points below us... very difficult to make the case for being safe ! [Post edited 29 Dec 2023 22:54]
|  | | |
| After that...are we safe. on 22:56 - Dec 29 with 1931 views | colinallcars |
If Huddersfield hit a winning run we are a country mile below the rest. |  | | |
| After that...are we safe. on 23:03 - Dec 29 with 1866 views | mart_Goblin |
I think it’s called ‘irony’ |  | | |
| After that...are we safe. on 23:20 - Dec 29 with 1756 views | earthdweller |
| After that...are we safe. on 22:48 - Dec 29 by qpr_1968 |
lighten up mate... |
apologies | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| After that...are we safe. on 00:30 - Dec 30 with 1552 views | Jigsore |
every team around us are starting to pick up wins, even Rotherham. When we play well we're still picking up draws |  |
| “The thing about football - the important thing about football - is that it is not just about football.†|
| |
| After that...are we safe. on 07:36 - Dec 30 with 1323 views | Rs_Holy |
| After that...are we safe. on 22:48 - Dec 29 by sdm1508 |
Really hope we have a striker lined up. Doesn't have to be a goal scorer as such. Weigh in with a few and actually hold up the ball, pose a problem and bring others into play. Dykes isn't doing either and Armstrong tonight has shown he hasn't really developed his game. Not making easy decisions and execution bad at times. One point building up play and misplaces a 5 yard pass. He is a impact sub at the moment when game is stretched. Doesn't have the technical ability to hold it up well |
Probably depends on whether we can loan out 1 or possibly 2 of our current ‘strikers’ to lower league teams??? |  | | |
| After that...are we safe. on 07:42 - Dec 30 with 1310 views | DeanoMD |
We are consistently inconsistent so who the Jeff knows........ | | | |
| After that...are we safe. on 08:56 - Dec 30 with 1131 views | LongsufferingR |
Home games against Hudds, Millwall, Sheff Wed and Rotherham still to come. It's ours to fk up. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
