| Place Your Bets 08:59 - Jul 8 with 24752 views | Chesham_Saint | So…who is this unnamed BBC “household name” accused of paying for “naughty pics”? In a reverse of the usual, I’m going to list my top 3 who I hope and believe it’s not (which means, of course, no football presenters - it couldn’t of course ever be one of those overpaid tossers who are all as good as gold…!). So, top 3 who I hope it’s NOT…. The three blokes off Would I Lie To You. |  |
| |  |
| Place Your Bets on 22:26 - Jul 11 with 3475 views | Southamptonfan |
| Place Your Bets on 12:59 - Jul 11 by saintjeff52 | Huw Edwards. |
Apparently it is Hugh Edwards as you say..He hasn't don't news at 10 so people are saying and he is Welsh. I thought it would likely be Graeme Norton but it seems it's Mr sensible newsreader. Not confirmed obviously and innocent until proven guilty. [Post edited 11 Jul 2023 22:32]
|  |
|  |
| Place Your Bets on 18:20 - Jul 12 with 3249 views | arfurdent |
| Place Your Bets on 22:26 - Jul 11 by Southamptonfan | Apparently it is Hugh Edwards as you say..He hasn't don't news at 10 so people are saying and he is Welsh. I thought it would likely be Graeme Norton but it seems it's Mr sensible newsreader. Not confirmed obviously and innocent until proven guilty. [Post edited 11 Jul 2023 22:32]
|
outed by his wife |  |
| So Long and Thanks for all the Fish |
|  |
| Place Your Bets on 18:21 - Jul 12 with 3246 views | 1885_SFC |
| Place Your Bets on 18:20 - Jul 12 by arfurdent | outed by his wife |
Soon to be ex-wife I'd imagine... |  |
|  |
| Place Your Bets on 19:08 - Jul 12 with 3179 views | kentsouthampton | Probably the only time I'm ever going to agree with GB news. |  | |  |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 19:34 - Jul 12 with 3150 views | Bazza | [Post edited 12 Jul 2023 19:35]
|  | |  |
| Place Your Bets on 19:35 - Jul 12 with 3147 views | solent_toffee |
| Place Your Bets on 22:26 - Jul 11 by Southamptonfan | Apparently it is Hugh Edwards as you say..He hasn't don't news at 10 so people are saying and he is Welsh. I thought it would likely be Graeme Norton but it seems it's Mr sensible newsreader. Not confirmed obviously and innocent until proven guilty. [Post edited 11 Jul 2023 22:32]
|
Why would you think it was Graham Norton? |  | |  |
| Place Your Bets on 19:57 - Jul 12 with 3120 views | kentsouthampton |
| Place Your Bets on 19:35 - Jul 12 by solent_toffee | Why would you think it was Graham Norton? |
Prolly because he's a dullard. |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
| Place Your Bets on 22:06 - Jul 12 with 3074 views | Ron11 |
| Place Your Bets on 19:57 - Jul 12 by kentsouthampton | Prolly because he's a dullard. |
And a slimy gobby little tw at |  | |  |
| Place Your Bets on 07:19 - Jul 13 with 3000 views | Jellybaby | So basically for £160.00 a year we can all sponsor a child abuser and we get some low grade soaps thrown in for free.... |  |
| I wholly disapprove of what you say and will defend to the death your right to say it. |
|  |
| Place Your Bets on 08:47 - Jul 13 with 2951 views | kentsouthampton | I don't think anyone has abused a child, he's been vilified for viewing porn, something you've probably done hundreds of times. |  | |  |
| Place Your Bets on 09:01 - Jul 13 with 2942 views | Heisenberg |
| Place Your Bets on 07:19 - Jul 13 by Jellybaby | So basically for £160.00 a year we can all sponsor a child abuser and we get some low grade soaps thrown in for free.... |
That’s the trouble with you conspiracy theorists. Thick as shite. |  |
|  |
| Place Your Bets on 09:21 - Jul 13 with 2934 views | Ron11 | "How's about that then, guys and gals?" "Tie me kangaroo down sport" |  | |  |
| Place Your Bets on 09:39 - Jul 13 with 2930 views | Jellybaby |
| Place Your Bets on 09:01 - Jul 13 by Heisenberg | That’s the trouble with you conspiracy theorists. Thick as shite. |
Oh did I hit a raw nerve fella or is that your level of debate? |  |
| I wholly disapprove of what you say and will defend to the death your right to say it. |
|  |
| Place Your Bets on 09:52 - Jul 13 with 2914 views | Heisenberg |
| Place Your Bets on 09:39 - Jul 13 by Jellybaby | Oh did I hit a raw nerve fella or is that your level of debate? |
Whatever you think of Huw Edwards he is clearly not a child abuser. Personally I think it’s pretty low to accuse someone of something despite the evidence. Then again you don’t really deal in evidence. |  |
|  |
| Place Your Bets on 10:28 - Jul 13 with 2903 views | StRipper |
| Place Your Bets on 09:52 - Jul 13 by Heisenberg | Whatever you think of Huw Edwards he is clearly not a child abuser. Personally I think it’s pretty low to accuse someone of something despite the evidence. Then again you don’t really deal in evidence. |
Maybe not. Thats proven to be Phillip Schofield, that this story is working as a distraction from |  | |  |
| Place Your Bets on 11:51 - Jul 13 with 2878 views | arfurdent | So I wonder who the gutter press will turn on next |  |
| So Long and Thanks for all the Fish |
|  |
| Place Your Bets on 12:29 - Jul 13 with 2863 views | UTS1885 |
| Place Your Bets on 11:51 - Jul 13 by arfurdent | So I wonder who the gutter press will turn on next |
the vile Dan Wootton, read all the posts about Wotton from a former boyfriend https://threadreaderapp.com/th [Post edited 13 Jul 2023 12:49]
|  | |  |
| Place Your Bets on 13:23 - Jul 13 with 2835 views | Jellybaby |
| Place Your Bets on 09:52 - Jul 13 by Heisenberg | Whatever you think of Huw Edwards he is clearly not a child abuser. Personally I think it’s pretty low to accuse someone of something despite the evidence. Then again you don’t really deal in evidence. |
We don't know the truth about Huw Edwards, that wasn't my point, but we do know that the BBC have a never-ending history of actual and alleged peodophilia and the general public are coerced into supporting it through an unjust TV license scheme. If you want to defend that be my guest. |  |
| I wholly disapprove of what you say and will defend to the death your right to say it. |
|  |
| Place Your Bets on 14:31 - Jul 13 with 2815 views | kentsouthampton |
| Place Your Bets on 13:23 - Jul 13 by Jellybaby | We don't know the truth about Huw Edwards, that wasn't my point, but we do know that the BBC have a never-ending history of actual and alleged peodophilia and the general public are coerced into supporting it through an unjust TV license scheme. If you want to defend that be my guest. |
The truth is the police have said he's done nothing wrong and no amount of your cretinous whataboutery is going to change that fact. |  | |  |
| Place Your Bets on 14:42 - Jul 13 with 2809 views | arfurdent |
| Place Your Bets on 14:31 - Jul 13 by kentsouthampton | The truth is the police have said he's done nothing wrong and no amount of your cretinous whataboutery is going to change that fact. |
and when have the police ever told the whole truth |  |
| So Long and Thanks for all the Fish |
|  |
| Place Your Bets on 16:32 - Jul 13 with 2768 views | UTS1885 | He looks to have paid for photos and the person was consenting and not underage, so no crime. Its a private family matter and not for national media ghouls and fruitloops on the internet. |  | |  |
| Place Your Bets on 17:05 - Jul 13 with 2751 views | Bazza | Not just a family matter since he seems to have broken the BBCs internal rules about preserving the company’s public image, every one of their employees have that condition in their contract. |  | |  |
| Place Your Bets on 18:23 - Jul 13 with 2725 views | Jellybaby |
| Place Your Bets on 14:31 - Jul 13 by kentsouthampton | The truth is the police have said he's done nothing wrong and no amount of your cretinous whataboutery is going to change that fact. |
Oh dear, are you still in the trusting stage? Trust the police, trust what the BBC say, trust the government, trust the establishment. You poor sod, there's a lot of unlearning to do. |  |
| I wholly disapprove of what you say and will defend to the death your right to say it. |
|  |
| Place Your Bets on 19:47 - Jul 13 with 2692 views | UTS1885 |
| Place Your Bets on 17:05 - Jul 13 by Bazza | Not just a family matter since he seems to have broken the BBCs internal rules about preserving the company’s public image, every one of their employees have that condition in their contract. |
Yeah i would have added employer, but all still private and not for scum like the sun to frontpage like they did. |  | |  |
| |