By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
And while we're at it - those stupid unnecessary bollards near the club shop are just asking for someone to sue the club. Another poor bloke with blood all over his face last week cos he fell over one. Pitch black there with hundreds of people walking by them and not a chance to avoid them unless you know they're there.
Instead of it taking 5 minutes to clear everyone from the "flashpoint" corner of Pearl Street and Willbuts lane by opening the usual gates, it took 15 minutes instead by everyone trampling all over each other to get out of the one open gate at the other end then walking back that way anyway! I'd love to know the logic behind that stupendous decision.
I'm not too ar5ed about being frisked, bit unnecessary but no big deal. I'm more annoyed about the fact I didn't get home till nearly 6.00 because of the exit fiasco and then more ba5tard roadworks (which also caused me to miss the to55ing kick off!)
When Hill and Flitcroft were here first time, whilst still in League 2, the club came up with "a 7 year plan to reach the Championship."
Despite the howls of laughter from most fans, I seriously think we would have had a good chance of being on the verge of that had they stayed with the club but I feel that was more down to the unbelievable momentum we had gained rather than any seriously laid down "behind the scenes" plans - if those plans had been in place, they surely wouldn't have turned to sh1t so quickly.
I know that most trust members will probably be on this message board and will therefore know what the issues are with David Bottomley but for those that don't, it would perhaps be helpful if the trust specified why they are proposing the removal of him and particularly the removal of Graham Rawlinson - it is difficult to expect people to vote on these issues without knowing why that proposal is being made.
This isn't meant as a discussion on why they should go, I am saying that trust members who aren't on here should be given all the facts before being asked to vote.