Daytime running lights 20:58 - Jan 26 with 5253 views | jack2jack | Why do some manufacturers insist on fitting them, in order that they blind oncoming drivers,surely they don't need to be so bright. Opinions/observations welcome. | | | | |
Daytime running lights on 10:20 - Jan 28 with 730 views | LeonWasGod |
"Research" though. Sounds like 'experts' to me. *spits in a spittoon* Bob down the pub knows more about this. | | | |
Daytime running lights on 13:24 - Jan 28 with 697 views | Flashberryjack |
Daytime running lights on 10:20 - Jan 28 by LeonWasGod | "Research" though. Sounds like 'experts' to me. *spits in a spittoon* Bob down the pub knows more about this. |
"Research has shown that DRLs are likely to reduce multiple vehicle daytime accidents and fatalities by up to 6% once all vehicles are equipped " The word "likely" suggests that the research outcome is more of an educated case, rather than actual proof, but hey! they're "experts" and they never get things wrong. Bit like Bob down the pub making the same educated guess, without getting paid a vast amount of money to do so. [Post edited 28 Jan 2019 15:52]
| |
| |
Daytime running lights on 15:02 - Jan 28 with 685 views | BytholWyn | The Scandinavian countries have been doing this for years, so it's not as if this is radical stuff. It wouldn't be necessary if people used common sense and put their headlights/sidelights on during twilight hours or when it's gloomy. It never ceases to amaze me the number of times you have people driving around without their lights on. Sometimes it can be an oversight rather than bad judgement, or people on long journeys starting in daytime not realising that they haven't got their lights on. In any event it's plain common sense to take human error out of the equation. Does anyone seriously regard it as a serious infringement of their liberty to be have their lights on if that saves lives? Yet another manifestation of the evil EU empire? | | | |
| |