Who'd have Thunk it eh!!
I suggest you read it in full, but a few bits to point out that is very interesting:
1 Data source & preparation
On 23rd June 2021 I was given access to a substantial TXT file (22MB) held on a shared Google drive
entitled XXXX_20210101_ToDate.txt1
, this being a dump of electronic records of admissions for the
period 1st January 2021 — 13th June 2021 for an unknown NHS Trust. When imported into Excel this
consisted of 161,495
The rows represent admissions to this particular NHS trust!
In table 3 of report 8 — Vaccination Status & Incidence of COVID-19 we observed some 38.2% of
COVID-19 admissions being discharged back home; a finding that was deemed ‘striking’.
So people going into hospital for whatever reason, being labelled as a Covid victim then strangely enough being discharged home.
3.2 Chief Complaint
There remains the issue of the chief complaint. The 161,494 emergency department admissions
records within XXXX_20210101_ToDate.txt yielded a total of 140 unique complaints ranging from
‘Abrasion’ to ‘Wound Care (procedure)’. These were assessed for likely relevance to SARS-COV-2
infection/COVID-19.
So basically going in with non related covid issues and being admitted as a covid patient hmmmmm
5 The implication
To date 10 reports have been written totalling 60,799 words of analysis made on 102k electronic
records of deceased patients and 898k emergency department admission records. Many conclusions
have been drawn from 117 figures and 82 tables. All this work has been based on the assumption
that NHS Trusts have been coding incidence of COVID-19 in a diligent manner backed by clinical
diagnosis. It is abundantly clear this is not the case and that the electronic patient record system is
awash with asymptomatic/false positive admissions requiring care for other diseases and conditions
whilst their data record is flagged as ‘COVID’.
6 Summary of key points
4. 4,190/161,494 admissions met the criterion of a COVID-compatible chief complaint backed by a SARSCOV-2 marker diagnosis (2.6%), whereas 4,535/161,494 admissions met the criterion of a COVIDcompatible chief complaint backed by a respiratory diagnosis (2.8%). The total number of admissions
presenting with a relevant respiratory diagnosis and a SARS-COV-2 diagnostic marker was 125
(0.08%).
6. By adopting an audit criterion of a relevant chief complaint with a supporting respiratory diagnosis as
the basis for COVID-19 validation we discover only 9.7% (204/2,102) of declared COVID cases actually
exhibited the fundamental basis for symptomatic disease between 1st January and 13th June 2021.
7. It was concluded that that the ED electronic patient record system is awash with asymptomatic/false
positive admissions that primarily require emergency care for non-COVID diseases and conditions
whilst their data record is flagged as ‘COVID’. This dilution of the true clinical picture explains the
peculiar ‘non-results’ from various analyses undertaken and seriously undermines any and all study of
the evidence base.
https://in-this-together.com/u
This seriously undermines the entire narrative being pushed for vaccinating kids, vaccine passports etc. |  |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.