By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
It has cost £150 million and rising. Nobody has been deported to Rwanda yet. Another waste of taxpayers money.
Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
Has the government considered not violating people’s human rights?
Most credible governments would start here ..
As somebody said fairly recently about the Tory London based administration …. ‘a culture that prized campaigning over careful governing, opinion polls over detailed policy debates, announcements over implementation’.
The intention is to criticise current Government policy by claiming that 3/4 of irregular migrants arriving do qualify for asylum (mainly on the basis of country of origin). The report rather lets the cat out of the bag though with its estimate that only 3.4% of arrivals can be sent back, even after the new Act. The Council say this is because countries like India will not accept returns after certain technical changes introduced by the Act, but the reality is that most don't go back either because the origin countries won't accept them or their documents have been destroyed. This undermines the oft-made argument that the problem is the delay in processing asylum claims, which leads to people who could have been deported remaining in the UK. The way I see it is that having somewhere to send failed asylum seekers is crucial. The likely price for the EU to do this (safe routes and sharing of the migration burden) is too high and will raise numbers of migrants arriving in the UK. Rwanda is not ideal but is a model that we must pursue.
The problem with the human rights argument is that, if we accept the UNHCR's interpretation of the rights conferred by the 1951 Convention, more people than we can possibly accommodate have the "right" to asylum in the UK - several multiples of our existing population. How many people would enter a contract that they couldn't help breaching if everybody given rights under that contract exercised them?
A failed asylum seeker got in a taxi to a children's hospital in Liverpool with the sole intention of blowing up the maternity ward .Thank god he failed .I think you would be better addressing the human rights of the people in this country having this nonsense forced on them They didn't vote for it but are paying a huge cost everyday . Half of them just want to come for the benefits they could stay in France As it 's a safe country . Far too many of these asylum seekers end up criminals - fact
A failed asylum seeker got in a taxi to a children's hospital in Liverpool with the sole intention of blowing up the maternity ward .Thank god he failed .I think you would be better addressing the human rights of the people in this country having this nonsense forced on them They didn't vote for it but are paying a huge cost everyday . Half of them just want to come for the benefits they could stay in France As it 's a safe country . Far too many of these asylum seekers end up criminals - fact
Maybe the Ukrainian refugees should all stay in Poland, as that's the nearest safe country to the Ukraine.
Maybe the Ukrainian refugees should all stay in Poland, as that's the nearest safe country to the Ukraine.
You are probably right there's a case to be made for that but they are genuine refugees though unlike many who are just economic chancers jumping on a bandwagon
You are probably right there's a case to be made for that but they are genuine refugees though unlike many who are just economic chancers jumping on a bandwagon
I would say they are not genuine refugees, as the vast majority of Ukraine has seen no war at all. Many actually travel back to see their families and friends
Maybe the Ukrainian refugees should all stay in Poland, as that's the nearest safe country to the Ukraine.
Poland with a smaller population than Ukraine cannot possibly help all the Ukrainians driven out of their country by the illegal invasion of their country by Russia. Fortunately the EU has freedom of movement and are happy to help genuine refugees.
The UK as usual is more than happy to help out genuine refugees as well.
Poland with a smaller population than Ukraine cannot possibly help all the Ukrainians driven out of their country by the illegal invasion of their country by Russia. Fortunately the EU has freedom of movement and are happy to help genuine refugees.
The UK as usual is more than happy to help out genuine refugees as well.
Poland has a bigger population than Ukraine.The vast majority of Ukraine has seen no conflict.They are economic refugees, but the difference is, they are white shinned
Poland has a bigger population than Ukraine.The vast majority of Ukraine has seen no conflict.They are economic refugees, but the difference is, they are white shinned
Poland has a smaller population than the Ukraine, how can you say the vast majority of the Ukraine had seen no conflict, the Russians have launched misfiles at population centres all over the country.
Poland has a smaller population than the Ukraine, how can you say the vast majority of the Ukraine had seen no conflict, the Russians have launched misfiles at population centres all over the country.
The conflict has only been in a small area in the east, the Donbass and Luhansk.
If the Russians had done what you have said, then the civilian casualty rates would have been much much higher.They are not targeting civilian areas. They certainly aren't using American supplied cluster bombs
The conflict has only been in a small area in the east, the Donbass and Luhansk.
If the Russians had done what you have said, then the civilian casualty rates would have been much much higher.They are not targeting civilian areas. They certainly aren't using American supplied cluster bombs
Seems you forget the aborted attack they ground to a halt on the Kyiv as well as the massacre of unarmed civilians.
Seems you forget the aborted attack they ground to a halt on the Kyiv as well as the massacre of unarmed civilians.
Not sure why you keep going of topic AGAIN .
To date, there have been around 9,700 deaths , not great i know, but compared to any conflict of this size, it's very small indeed. Research to see how many civilians died in other conflicts, Iraq, Afghan , Syria, Vietnam, Korea, and so on. It's not even as high as the Ukrainian militia inflicted on the Russian population in the Donbass
To date, there have been around 9,700 deaths , not great i know, but compared to any conflict of this size, it's very small indeed. Research to see how many civilians died in other conflicts, Iraq, Afghan , Syria, Vietnam, Korea, and so on. It's not even as high as the Ukrainian militia inflicted on the Russian population in the Donbass
Glad you agree thst 9700 lives would have been saved if Russia had not invaded Ukraine plus of course near 300,000 Russian casualties including 120,000 . What a waste. Still Putin is safe as his "law" course sentence another Russian journalist to 8 years for trying to tell the truth.
Glad you agree thst 9700 lives would have been saved if Russia had not invaded Ukraine plus of course near 300,000 Russian casualties including 120,000 . What a waste. Still Putin is safe as his "law" course sentence another Russian journalist to 8 years for trying to tell the truth.
He’s cracking is Vlad. Read that book I suggested Felix. Putin without doubt the biggest war criminal for many years.
Glad you agree thst 9700 lives would have been saved if Russia had not invaded Ukraine plus of course near 300,000 Russian casualties including 120,000 . What a waste. Still Putin is safe as his "law" course sentence another Russian journalist to 8 years for trying to tell the truth.
Of course, but if the Ukraine hadn't done what it did in the Donbass or if NATO had stayed out then this wouldn't have happened. Russia hasn't suffered anything like those casualties, it's western media lies, rather the Ukrainian military has taken huge casualties and is on the brink of collapse
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
