| The Hunger Strikers 17:36 - Dec 12 with 170 views | Dr_Winston |
The likes of Corbyn, Sultana, Polanski et all demonstrating emphatically why they should be allowed nowhere near actual power in the UK.
Voicing support for violent thugs who attacked a policewoman with a sledge hammer and then take part in an intermittent fast (not even a proper hunger strike), and they treat it like a major issue instead of a textbook case of FAFO.
|  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |  |
| The Hunger Strikers on 17:52 - Dec 12 with 154 views | max936 |
Those far left are gonna ruin this Country, the Tories started the rot and Labour have and are making think's 10 times with those in the fair left of the party.
You only got to listen to what those in Welsh Labour to know that.
Trouble is Corbyn is seeing an opportunity to make himself relevant again. |  |
| |
| The Hunger Strikers on 18:01 - Dec 12 with 144 views | AnotherJohn |
Completely crazy to think that any Western country could allow an organised group to plan and carry out attacks on national defence assets. The offenders have to get serious jail time. |  | | |
| The Hunger Strikers on 19:17 - Dec 12 with 101 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
Sultana and Corbyn AKA the fruit and nut party are trying to table motions to have them released on bail as they claim death is imminent for these terrorists who are taking it in turns to skip the odd meal.
Why can’t we do what they did to Ian Brady and pin the scumbags down and shove tubes down their throats? |  |
| |
| The Hunger Strikers on 19:17 - Dec 12 with 101 views | majorraglan |
I’ve no time for Corbyn or his ilk, I’m also of the view that the offenders should be held on remand BUT there are a couple of points in the article which need to be considered and looked at.
It appears that the trial is going to take place in January 2027 which will mean the suspects will spend 18 months on remand, that’s about 3 times longer than the limit for an indictable offence - I think that’s poor tbh and every effort should be made to speed things up. Being on remand for that length of time is in my opinion unacceptable. Expedite the case and if their found guilty bang them up for a long long time, but
Another major issue the article highlights is the fact that ministers have taking up to 12 months to reply to MPs raising the case. That’s bang out of order. We can’t have a situation where ministers and the civil service are ignoring MPs, we’re a democratic society where the rule of law should be sacrosanct and impartially discharged. Nobody should be above the law and government officials shouldn’t be exempt from answering questions or scrutiny in relation to cases. If ministers can do it here they can do it anywhere.
It’s not justice the offenders, the victims shouldn’t have to wait 18 months to 2 years for justice. | | | |
| The Hunger Strikers on 19:40 - Dec 12 with 95 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
| The Hunger Strikers on 19:17 - Dec 12 by majorraglan |
I’ve no time for Corbyn or his ilk, I’m also of the view that the offenders should be held on remand BUT there are a couple of points in the article which need to be considered and looked at.
It appears that the trial is going to take place in January 2027 which will mean the suspects will spend 18 months on remand, that’s about 3 times longer than the limit for an indictable offence - I think that’s poor tbh and every effort should be made to speed things up. Being on remand for that length of time is in my opinion unacceptable. Expedite the case and if their found guilty bang them up for a long long time, but
Another major issue the article highlights is the fact that ministers have taking up to 12 months to reply to MPs raising the case. That’s bang out of order. We can’t have a situation where ministers and the civil service are ignoring MPs, we’re a democratic society where the rule of law should be sacrosanct and impartially discharged. Nobody should be above the law and government officials shouldn’t be exempt from answering questions or scrutiny in relation to cases. If ministers can do it here they can do it anywhere.
It’s not justice the offenders, the victims shouldn’t have to wait 18 months to 2 years for justice. |
The limit on time on remand can be extended if the charges are serious enough. Lucy letby was on remand for years waiting for her trial.
As these are designated terrorists with charges of a violent nature they can be little doubt they are incredibly high risk of reoffending so keeping them on remand is absolutely the correct thing to do in order to protect the public against their violent shenaniganery. | |
| |
| The Hunger Strikers on 20:26 - Dec 12 with 70 views | majorraglan |
| The Hunger Strikers on 19:40 - Dec 12 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
The limit on time on remand can be extended if the charges are serious enough. Lucy letby was on remand for years waiting for her trial.
As these are designated terrorists with charges of a violent nature they can be little doubt they are incredibly high risk of reoffending so keeping them on remand is absolutely the correct thing to do in order to protect the public against their violent shenaniganery. |
I appreciate that remand can be extended and I’m in favour of keeping this lot in for longer, but 18 months in my opinion is excessive.
The prosecution should be told to pull out all the stops and get this case ready for trial in say 9 months. It’s a damning indictment of our criminal justice system that this case has to wait 18 months before it can be heard. It’s likely that the closure of half the Courts in the U.K. by the previous government is factor in the delay, but imho the current government should be making efforts to identify temporary Courts etc to get justice moving again. | | | |
| The Hunger Strikers on 22:03 - Dec 12 with 44 views | Demitrius |
Personally....?
I'd just waste them. Job done. No publicity. If they want to die we can make that happen....
Begrudging respect to Sands in that it was a proper protest. Courage of conviction which these rainbow f**nuggets mob lack...
Je ne suis pas un Liberal... [Post edited 12 Dec 22:05]
|  |
| “Cunnilingus and Psychiatry brought us to this …” |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
