Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Banned for your views 11:57 - Feb 3 with 18696 viewsHayesender



Whatever your views on gender/race/religion etc, this is absolutely terrifying that a private company can have this much power

Poll: Shamima Beghum

11
Banned for your views on 23:57 - Feb 8 with 2123 viewsLazyFan

Banned for your views on 15:58 - Feb 8 by Smokey

Of all the insanely depressing posts on here. This one takes no.1 spot. Such blind and viscous prejudice packing a number of completely unsupported smears into a short post

Can you justify in what way, "This is extremists trying to exploit football"?

In what way, is this remotely, "just like when the NF were handing out their filth outside football grounds in the 70s"

Can you explain how, "they want to whip up hatred and shut down people who don't agree with them"

The scary part is I think you believe what you are saying but it's based on nothing. You just haven’t thought it through and have prejudice programmed into your thinking. You can’t assess the individual case or separate it from your hatred for someone who isn’t on your political team.

There's a number of pretty bat sh t crazy posts here though

Martin Luther King wanted racism to end. He wanted people judge on content of character not colour of their skin. But some casual racism from JimtheHip and FDC who disagree with MLK and seem to find the colour of Toby Young relevant and his whiteness somehowmaking him less deserving of an opinion

What's standouts is none of the angry, hateful comments address the actual story. Instead it’s just a pile on and chuck out unsubstantiated Owen Jones sound bite smears and offensive nasty hateful comments to try and shout down a potentially reasonable argument

Lazyfan shoots off on a tangent calling this capitalism. It isn't

Also says 'state control' is for the people means being “for the people over private enterprise”which is such a painfully ignorant statement. Firstly if you just think about that statement how can that possibly be true. How on earth can state control be only for the people. I would imagine in your world you wouldn’t see Trump running the state as being “for the people over private enterprise”. You might see though the dementia addled puppet Biden’s cronyism. Such is the blind political side taking and removal of critical thinking from most minds in society

Suggest Lazyfan goes and reads up on Stalins Collectivization and the Holodomor which killed 4m Ukrainians. Or how 'state control' for the people worked out in Zimbabwe and Venezuela

This whole thread is an insight into the ill informed and dangerously misguided opinions and spiteful and hateful nature of many within our society. Lazyfan takes that to the extreme


"Lazyfan shoots off on a tangent calling this capitalism. It isn't"

It is, Football is no longer the domain of the working people. It's run by Big Business and silly Toby thinks he's being anti-woke not realising he's actually discovered that the bosses make the decisions.

"Also says 'state control' is for the people means being “for the people over private enterprise”which is such a painfully ignorant statement."

So, the state should be run for Big Business? No it should be run for the UK citizens. We have fought for democracy to try and ensure that happens. It does not always come out that way, especially recently, but that's the idea. I want to expand that idea so, that we don't go back to being run by the Monarchy. That's what the English Civil War was fought over. I want more democracy not less.

"Firstly if you just think about that statement how can that possibly be true. How on earth can state control be only for the people. I would imagine in your world you wouldn’t see Trump running the state as being “for the people over private enterprise”."

Err ... I am not sure what you going on about here. It does not make sense. So, you want Private Enterprise over the state? That could be possible if we the UK people owned it all and ran it democracy. I am happy about that, but we don't. So, you want the few to maintain power over the many as we have now. But you want it to continue. For what purpose? So, you can doff your cap and go yes squire?

"You might see though the dementia addled puppet Biden’s cronyism. Such is the blind political side taking and removal of critical thinking from most minds in society"

Critical thinking has been asked for in our schooling system many times by the left. The right has blocked it every time. Far from removing it, I want everyone to do it. Rather than be docile bleating sheep following the centre ground like it's some moderate way, I want people to vote democratically as much as possible. Biden is another Starmer for me so, another Tory. He's just not as bad as Trump, but to me, Trump is another Hitler in waiting. Thus the bar is as low as it goes.

"Suggest Lazyfan goes and reads up on Stalins Collectivization and the Holodomor, which killed 4m Ukrainians. Or how 'state control' for the people worked out in Zimbabwe and Venezuela"

Those are state dictatorships, rather than democracies. I want more state democracy so, much so, I would have it in the workplace. I doubt you would. So, state dictatorships are bad, but private dictatorships are all okay? To me Stalinism is closer to Nazism so, I am against both of these. It's all a form of fascism to me.

"This whole thread is an insight into the ill informed and dangerously misguided opinions and spiteful and hateful nature of many within our society. Lazyfan takes that to the extreme"

What's extreme about wanting the state to be actually for real working people and not sell out to big business every time? Actually, considering the cow-towing to your business overlords, perhaps that is extreme ... for you.


It's quite simple, I am for empowering UK citizens through as much democracy as possible, including in the workplace. If you think the boss knows best ... well watch out, one of us lefties could end up being the boss!

zzzzzzzzzz

1
Banned for your views on 23:59 - Feb 8 with 2116 viewsqpr_1968

anyway


https://youtube.com/shorts/9h7Ys0n6MqQ?si=1zTuR8HOFAnsZAAC

Poll: how many games this season....home/away.

0
Banned for your views on 02:29 - Feb 9 with 1985 viewsSheffieldHoop

Banned for your views on 22:54 - Feb 8 by ChrisNW6

Have you seen some of the vile stuff she was posting on twitter on a daily basis. She put herself in the firing line and it got so bad the police interviewed her under caution. Why didn't Toby Young give all the facts, clickbait.


Any examples? I've had a quick look, all I can find is this screenshot from the Premier League dossier....Which they've only apparently released the front cover of??



Worthy of a club ban? Really?

"Someone despises me. That's their problem." Marcus Aurelius

1
Banned for your views on 05:26 - Feb 9 with 1909 viewsSydneyRs

Banned for your views on 23:39 - Feb 8 by LazyFan

Imagine this concept, they may not actually be for the workers and more interested in Big Business. I don't see the difference between One Nation Tories and Blairites. There is no difference; they are both pro-big business at the expense of workers.

Even Starmer says it's okay to call him a conservative. So, even he admits he's a Tory. I have more respect for the Tories as at least I can understand their point of view and their principled stand on ensuring their party continues to be on the right. But Starmer's mission seems to be to drag the only major worker's party to the right. And this is the real point of Starmer, not the government but to destroy the left. It won't work and he is going to be, as people will see a worse liar than Boris.

If your union is not doing it for you, then change their leaders. If you cannot do that, you can change Unions. If you cannot do that, then you can leave. If they don't deliver value, don't pay the subs. And tell em why when you leave and all your co-workers.


I've long held the view that there isn't much difference between Labour and the tories any more policy wise. However this current lot have been beyond a joke for many years now and have just got to go. That might be the kick up the arse they need to sort themselves out and become a proper conservative party again rather than a bunch of extremist loons.
1
Banned for your views on 08:41 - Feb 9 with 1757 viewsChrisNW6

Banned for your views on 02:29 - Feb 9 by SheffieldHoop

Any examples? I've had a quick look, all I can find is this screenshot from the Premier League dossier....Which they've only apparently released the front cover of??



Worthy of a club ban? Really?


If your openly posting abhorrent stuff about Dr Mengele, grooming and mutilating children and getting investigated by the police then I say fair game. Why would anyone want to openly post that shite about a minority group. People are welcome to views but she obviously crossed a line and I'd be happy if the same happened at QPR.
0
Banned for your views on 10:39 - Feb 9 with 1630 viewsClive_Anderson

Not been on here in ages, but I'm totally shocked that the group of angry ill-informed shouty communists that reside on here 24/7 are cheering this sort of thing on.

The thing is that they know full well that what is happening is wrong, but because it's affecting the "other side" they are absolutely delighted about it.

Even more hilarious are the ones going "Clive's on holiday how could you post this, quick shut it down!". Great argument that one lads
5
Banned for your views on 10:54 - Feb 9 with 1617 viewsHoopinEssex

Banned for your views on 10:39 - Feb 9 by Clive_Anderson

Not been on here in ages, but I'm totally shocked that the group of angry ill-informed shouty communists that reside on here 24/7 are cheering this sort of thing on.

The thing is that they know full well that what is happening is wrong, but because it's affecting the "other side" they are absolutely delighted about it.

Even more hilarious are the ones going "Clive's on holiday how could you post this, quick shut it down!". Great argument that one lads


To be fair they are mainly online and social media.

Personally I'm not right or left. For me there is just right and wrong.

The problem is everyone just takes a side and doesn't even question when the thing they are saying is just madness. But as long as the other side are annoyed who cares.

It's quite obviously wrong that this stuff is happening. You don't have to like Toby Young. It's just playing the man and not the ball.

The funny thing is posters going on about capitalism while typing on an apple Mac or iPhone. But hypocritical?

I'm not even a lover of the system but have we ever had a better one?
4
Banned for your views on 10:57 - Feb 9 with 1614 viewsSonic_Hoop

Banned for your views on 10:39 - Feb 9 by Clive_Anderson

Not been on here in ages, but I'm totally shocked that the group of angry ill-informed shouty communists that reside on here 24/7 are cheering this sort of thing on.

The thing is that they know full well that what is happening is wrong, but because it's affecting the "other side" they are absolutely delighted about it.

Even more hilarious are the ones going "Clive's on holiday how could you post this, quick shut it down!". Great argument that one lads


Funny that none of the free peachers were up in arms about the D.O.E monitoring School staff for airing opinions critical of government policy.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/oct/21/uk-government-keeping-files-on-

It's no surprise they'd champion a eugenicist either, as Young believes we should improve the IQ of the working class with selective breeding.

It's culture war clickbait for the easily triggered.
1
Login to get fewer ads

Banned for your views on 11:20 - Feb 9 with 1532 viewsClive_Anderson

Banned for your views on 10:57 - Feb 9 by Sonic_Hoop

Funny that none of the free peachers were up in arms about the D.O.E monitoring School staff for airing opinions critical of government policy.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/oct/21/uk-government-keeping-files-on-

It's no surprise they'd champion a eugenicist either, as Young believes we should improve the IQ of the working class with selective breeding.

It's culture war clickbait for the easily triggered.


Having read that article you linked then that is clearly wrong as well and should not have happened. No one on here is cheering that on, even though it might have affected people on "the other side" that time. Some people are actually capable of being reasonable to those they disagree with.

Quite amusing how you are angry about one case of it happening, but dismiss the other total clickbait. Can you not see how absurdly partisan this is?

Also no one is championing eugenics on here, don't be silly. Why the constant need to lie, smear and spin even clear cut issues like this one? It just comes across as deranged.
5
Banned for your views on 11:31 - Feb 9 with 1503 viewsSheffieldHoop

Banned for your views on 08:41 - Feb 9 by ChrisNW6

If your openly posting abhorrent stuff about Dr Mengele, grooming and mutilating children and getting investigated by the police then I say fair game. Why would anyone want to openly post that shite about a minority group. People are welcome to views but she obviously crossed a line and I'd be happy if the same happened at QPR.


But Dr Mengele did mutilate children? What minority group did he come from? Mid-Century Germans? Is that a recognized minority these days?

I haven't seen the tweets or their context, I suspect neither have you.

"Someone despises me. That's their problem." Marcus Aurelius

0
Banned for your views on 11:42 - Feb 9 with 1457 viewsClive_Anderson

Banned for your views on 11:31 - Feb 9 by SheffieldHoop

But Dr Mengele did mutilate children? What minority group did he come from? Mid-Century Germans? Is that a recognized minority these days?

I haven't seen the tweets or their context, I suspect neither have you.


It's just endless shouting and smearing of what they see as the enemy to drown them out because they might actually have a point.

The can't just for once say "yeah you might be right on this", they have to continue in full on attack mode all the time trying to find some weird angle they can exploit. In this case they are trying to pretend it's actually all about eugenics and Dr Mengele. Really quite bizarre behaviour.

That or they're just bots and we're all wasting our time.
3
Banned for your views on 11:59 - Feb 9 with 1400 viewsSheffieldHoop

Banned for your views on 11:42 - Feb 9 by Clive_Anderson

It's just endless shouting and smearing of what they see as the enemy to drown them out because they might actually have a point.

The can't just for once say "yeah you might be right on this", they have to continue in full on attack mode all the time trying to find some weird angle they can exploit. In this case they are trying to pretend it's actually all about eugenics and Dr Mengele. Really quite bizarre behaviour.

That or they're just bots and we're all wasting our time.


It could get a whole lot weirder yet Mr Anderson, Page 4, we're only just getting started

"Someone despises me. That's their problem." Marcus Aurelius

0
Banned for your views on 12:02 - Feb 9 with 1403 viewsSonic_Hoop

Banned for your views on 11:20 - Feb 9 by Clive_Anderson

Having read that article you linked then that is clearly wrong as well and should not have happened. No one on here is cheering that on, even though it might have affected people on "the other side" that time. Some people are actually capable of being reasonable to those they disagree with.

Quite amusing how you are angry about one case of it happening, but dismiss the other total clickbait. Can you not see how absurdly partisan this is?

Also no one is championing eugenics on here, don't be silly. Why the constant need to lie, smear and spin even clear cut issues like this one? It just comes across as deranged.


It wasn't one case and if you can't distinguish between the seriousness of a government monitoring and censoring its citizens and a private company you need to give your head a wobble.

I'll ask again, why are the free peachers silent on fundamental issues of free speech yet vocal about the right to rightwing speech?
0
Banned for your views on 12:05 - Feb 9 with 1387 viewsSheffieldHoop

Banned for your views on 12:02 - Feb 9 by Sonic_Hoop

It wasn't one case and if you can't distinguish between the seriousness of a government monitoring and censoring its citizens and a private company you need to give your head a wobble.

I'll ask again, why are the free peachers silent on fundamental issues of free speech yet vocal about the right to rightwing speech?


I believe the official name for this is "whataboutery"

Keep it on topic mate, if you want to start a thread about something else, crack on. This one is about the Newcastle fan who was banned for posting her protected beliefs on twitter.

"Someone despises me. That's their problem." Marcus Aurelius

0
Banned for your views on 12:14 - Feb 9 with 1343 viewsClive_Anderson

Banned for your views on 12:02 - Feb 9 by Sonic_Hoop

It wasn't one case and if you can't distinguish between the seriousness of a government monitoring and censoring its citizens and a private company you need to give your head a wobble.

I'll ask again, why are the free peachers silent on fundamental issues of free speech yet vocal about the right to rightwing speech?


Can't you agree that they are both wrong? I don't get it.

I've not been silent on fundamental issues of free speech, in fact I agreed with you about your link. I honestly have no idea what you are trying to get at other than to have a go at right wingers.
3
Banned for your views on 12:34 - Feb 9 with 1304 viewsSonic_Hoop

Banned for your views on 12:05 - Feb 9 by SheffieldHoop

I believe the official name for this is "whataboutery"

Keep it on topic mate, if you want to start a thread about something else, crack on. This one is about the Newcastle fan who was banned for posting her protected beliefs on twitter.


It isn't "whataboutery", it's contextualisation.

It isn't "about" a fan being banned either. It's a post from a right wing propagandist group trying to radicalise.

Their more known for fake speech than free speech, so forgive me for dismissing this as just another exercise.

https://bylinetimes.com/2020/12/08/alt-right-pseudoscience-part-2-the-free-speec


https://bylinetimes.com/2020/12/04/alt-right-pseudoscience-part-1-lockdown-scept

I'm not going to start a seperate thread on it, I'd rather avoid publicising a far right pressure group on this site, thanks.
0
Banned for your views on 12:36 - Feb 9 with 1287 viewsSonic_Hoop

Banned for your views on 12:14 - Feb 9 by Clive_Anderson

Can't you agree that they are both wrong? I don't get it.

I've not been silent on fundamental issues of free speech, in fact I agreed with you about your link. I honestly have no idea what you are trying to get at other than to have a go at right wingers.


I'm on about the FSU, not you personally. I wouldn't take anything they publish as being anything near the truth, ever.
0
Banned for your views on 12:37 - Feb 9 with 1277 viewsSheffieldHoop

Banned for your views on 12:34 - Feb 9 by Sonic_Hoop

It isn't "whataboutery", it's contextualisation.

It isn't "about" a fan being banned either. It's a post from a right wing propagandist group trying to radicalise.

Their more known for fake speech than free speech, so forgive me for dismissing this as just another exercise.

https://bylinetimes.com/2020/12/08/alt-right-pseudoscience-part-2-the-free-speec


https://bylinetimes.com/2020/12/04/alt-right-pseudoscience-part-1-lockdown-scept

I'm not going to start a seperate thread on it, I'd rather avoid publicising a far right pressure group on this site, thanks.


Just to be clear then, not happening, or happening but a good thing?

"Someone despises me. That's their problem." Marcus Aurelius

0
Banned for your views on 12:42 - Feb 9 with 1267 viewsslmrstid

https://www.reddit.com/

You're all very boring.
[Post edited 9 Feb 12:43]
1
Banned for your views on 13:07 - Feb 9 with 1212 viewsSonic_Hoop

Banned for your views on 12:37 - Feb 9 by SheffieldHoop

Just to be clear then, not happening, or happening but a good thing?


I'm not sure. I'll wait and see what the truth of it is. Like the Farage bank ban, which ended up with their being no evidence of any customers having their accounts closed because of their views. Oddly, it was the same folk frothing at that; cbeebies, torygraph, Daily hate, free peachers.

There are people in prison for hate speech, mostly radical muslims tbf, so she could have gotten off lightly.
-3
Banned for your views on 13:13 - Feb 9 with 1157 viewsSheffieldHoop

Banned for your views on 12:42 - Feb 9 by slmrstid

https://www.reddit.com/

You're all very boring.
[Post edited 9 Feb 12:43]



"Someone despises me. That's their problem." Marcus Aurelius

1
Banned for your views on 13:25 - Feb 9 with 1091 viewsSheffieldHoop

Banned for your views on 13:07 - Feb 9 by Sonic_Hoop

I'm not sure. I'll wait and see what the truth of it is. Like the Farage bank ban, which ended up with their being no evidence of any customers having their accounts closed because of their views. Oddly, it was the same folk frothing at that; cbeebies, torygraph, Daily hate, free peachers.

There are people in prison for hate speech, mostly radical muslims tbf, so she could have gotten off lightly.


More whataboutery, and another strange case to bring up concerning this thread. Dame Alison Rose walked from her job for absolutely no reason then, I take it?

"Someone despises me. That's their problem." Marcus Aurelius

2
Banned for your views on 13:42 - Feb 9 with 1034 viewscharmr

The Lunatics have taken over the asylum.
0
Banned for your views on 14:46 - Feb 9 with 926 viewsSonic_Hoop

Banned for your views on 13:25 - Feb 9 by SheffieldHoop

More whataboutery, and another strange case to bring up concerning this thread. Dame Alison Rose walked from her job for absolutely no reason then, I take it?


It's not strange at all. She didn't resign because accounts were closed for customers because of their views, they weren't. Yet, the stink raised has led to some people believing the opposite.

It's a pretty good example of how these culture warriors operate to muddy the waters and dupe the gullible.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-66851909
0
Banned for your views on 15:01 - Feb 9 with 904 viewsSonic_Hoop

Banned for your views on 14:46 - Feb 9 by Sonic_Hoop

It's not strange at all. She didn't resign because accounts were closed for customers because of their views, they weren't. Yet, the stink raised has led to some people believing the opposite.

It's a pretty good example of how these culture warriors operate to muddy the waters and dupe the gullible.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-66851909


https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/oct/27/natwest-decision-to-close-nigel
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024