| uh oh on 08:41 - Feb 9 with 916 views | SaintNick |
Not sure that this would work, there would be two many blue cards that would need to be given |  |
| Satisfying The Bloodlust Of The Masses In Peacetime |
|  |
| uh oh on 13:35 - Feb 9 with 777 views | pjt50 |
Yet another case of IFAB having to do something to justify their existence. |  |
| |
| uh oh on 15:01 - Feb 9 with 711 views | SFC_Referee |
Works well for counteracting dissent, and maybe also for simulation, but I’m not a fan of it for “professional fouls” as it’ll just make the game too complex and make us get further away from the game we all love. As simulation is what we all hate, and the game has no need for dissent in it, but professional fouls is a part of the game and as everyone does it, and is usually punished annoy, that’s what makes it fair |  |
| |
| uh oh on 16:33 - Feb 9 with 666 views | Manhattan_Lynx |
Can't see this working. Surely there will be parking the bus a plenty and lots of injury time wasting. Pointless, all the while the current system is mostly fine.
What do actual referees think? |  | | |
| uh oh on 04:42 - Feb 10 with 506 views | Ripleys_revenge |
This idea sounds like it has come straight out of Rasmus’s playbook | | | |
| uh oh on 08:00 - Feb 10 with 457 views | kingolaf |
This is a great idea and will do wonders for the scourge of time-wasting!
If you want to punish players for dissent, then don’t be afraid to wave that second yellow. Sin bin for the rest of the game! | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
