By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
No doubting he’s a great player but he will have played a lot less PL games than Kane.
The kind of stats are meaningless, it’s like a caretaker manager winning his only game in charge and being top of tne pile with a 100% win ratio and therefore ‘clearly’ better than SAF.
[Post edited 28 Mar 2018 19:39]
0
(No subject) (n/t) on 19:41 - Mar 28 with 1255 views
No doubting he’s a great player but he will have played a lot less PL games than Kane.
The kind of stats are meaningless, it’s like a caretaker manager winning his only game in charge and being top of tne pile with a 100% win ratio and therefore ‘clearly’ better than SAF.
I really rate Charlie and in a way he's been a bit unlucky, but he's certainly (injuries aside) probably one of the best strikers going (certainly English wise) but he isnt better than Kane.
Nevertheless I think he'd do ok for England and I'd be delighted if he made the squad for Russia.
He wont though too injury prone
0
(No subject) (n/t) on 14:24 - Mar 29 with 785 views