| Potter we are in a far stronger position for summer window 11:00 - Mar 30 with 3673 views | thornabyswan |
Potter quoted that we are in a better position financially going into the summer transfer window.
But with revenue dropping again not massively and owners that want to sell anything that moves.
Is he kidding himself and fans. |  |
| |  |
| Potter we are in a far stronger position for summer window on 12:57 - Apr 2 with 510 views | valleyboy |
| Potter we are in a far stronger position for summer window on 19:25 - Apr 1 by NeathJack |
Have you ever considered going on Mastermind with the specialist subject of the bleeding obvious? |
Then if it was that obvious
Then why did you ask the question in the first place
How dull can you get
You ask the question then say it was obvious
That’s brilliant logic for you | | | |
| Potter we are in a far stronger position for summer window on 10:55 - Apr 3 with 421 views | Devz00 |
| Potter we are in a far stronger position for summer window on 13:08 - Mar 30 by jasper_T |
I remembered the Celina deal being earlier in the window when we thought we'd get decent fees for Fede and the Ayews etc. but looks like it was only a week before the transfer window closed.
Busy week, mind. |
Considering our transfer activity last summer, or lack of incomings, I did find the Celina deal odd.
It was a perfectly logical signing for us in that he’s a quality player, young, has Championship experience and wages won’t break the bank.
But we spent around £4m on him and we couldn’t afford anyone else. Something changed somewhere along the line in terms of transfer strategy and it must be down to the loan players not actually being sold. |  |
| Genetically, paedophiles have more genes in common with crabs than they do with you and me. Now that is scientific fact. There's no real evidence for it, but it is scientific fact. |
| |
| Potter we are in a far stronger position for summer window on 12:53 - Apr 3 with 379 views | grabsplatter |
| Potter we are in a far stronger position for summer window on 10:55 - Apr 3 by Devz00 |
Considering our transfer activity last summer, or lack of incomings, I did find the Celina deal odd.
It was a perfectly logical signing for us in that he’s a quality player, young, has Championship experience and wages won’t break the bank.
But we spent around £4m on him and we couldn’t afford anyone else. Something changed somewhere along the line in terms of transfer strategy and it must be down to the loan players not actually being sold. |
The club were also looking to offload Dyer & Routledge which also failed to happen |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
