| Piers Morgan 18:30 - Mar 9 with 5403 views | britferry |
41,000 people have complained about his views on Markle on GMB
So he's resigned |  |
| |  |
| Piers Morgan on 16:16 - Mar 16 with 1021 views | britferry |
| Piers Morgan on 16:10 - Mar 16 by londonlisa2001 |
“ by Markles "friends"”
By Harry and Markle’s friends.
He has a closer connection to Oprah than her - he’s making a mental health series with her. |
Gayle King is doing the talking, so does Harry play darts with her down the local? | |
| |
| Piers Morgan on 16:31 - Mar 16 with 996 views | Wingstandwood |
| Piers Morgan on 16:16 - Mar 16 by britferry |
Gayle King is doing the talking, so does Harry play darts with her down the local? |
Is that the one that attended (passport confiscated?) Meghans $500,000 baby shower in Manhattan? #howshesuffers. |  |
| |
| Piers Morgan on 16:45 - Mar 16 with 985 views | britferry |
| Piers Morgan on 16:31 - Mar 16 by Wingstandwood |
Is that the one that attended (passport confiscated?) Meghans $500,000 baby shower in Manhattan? #howshesuffers. |
I think so, I'm only hearing it as hear say as I wasn't invited to the do | |
| |
| Piers Morgan on 19:40 - Mar 16 with 945 views | britferry |
Well I'm not trying to break news, but I did actually call them to see how they were feeling, and it's true, Harry has talked to his brother and he has talked to his father too. The word I was given was that those conversations were not productive. But they are glad that they have at least started a conversation.
'And I think what is still upsetting to them is the palace keep saying they want to work it out privately, but yet, they believe these false stories are coming out that are very disparaging against Meghan, still.
'No one in the Royal Family has talked to Meghan yet, at this particular time. And I think it's frustrating for them to see that it's a racial conversation about the Royal Family when all they wanted all along was for the royals to intervene and tell the Press to stop with the unfair, inaccurate, false stories that definitely have a racial slant.
'And until you can acknowledge that, I think it's going to be hard to move forward. But they both want to move forward with this and they both want healing in this family. At the end of the day, that is Harry's family.'
============================================================
'The bullying thing was raised in 2018 and now there's an ongoing investigation about bullying from Meghan Markle, when anyone who has worked with her will tell you exactly who she is.
'You know, she's really a very sweet, caring person. And as I say, Meghan has documents to back up everything that she said on Oprah's interview. Everything.'
============================================================
'The family has to acknowledge that there are issues. Right now, no one has acknowledged, you know, Houston we have a problem here. That's really all they want. They want a conversation, they both want a conversation.' | |
| |
| Piers Morgan on 19:53 - Mar 16 with 939 views | britferry |
One minute she's going on about her privacy and mental health, the next she's blabbering to the US TV shows and repeatedly attacking the Royal family | |
| |
| Piers Morgan on 20:15 - Mar 21 with 830 views | britferry |
Good old Jezza
Writing in The Sun, Clarkson said Markle is “much revered by the young and the stupid who believe that her brand of simpering victimhood will one day bring down the monarchy, but it won’t”.
He argued that given what the royal family had endured in the past - “beheadings, affairs, abdications” — he is “fairly sure it’ll be able to weather the banal musings of a silly little cable TV actress”.
He added: “Trust me on this one. Markle’s toast, and within five years, I suspect she’ll be posing for photographs, on her own outside the Taj Mahal or sitting on the back of a playboy’s yacht in the Med, and poor old Piers will realise that he lost his job over absolutely nothing at all.”
Clarkson’s decision to support Morgan comes as something of a surprise given their history. The pair famously exchanged blows at the 2004 British Press Awards.
It was reported at the time that Clarkson “ambled over to The Mirror’s table and attacked, swinging a right hook at Morgan”.
“It was actually three punches,” Morgan later claimed. “He permanently scarred me above my temple because he had a ring on, but the good news was he broke his little finger hitting my head because I’m that hard.” | |
| |
| Piers Morgan on 17:38 - Mar 29 with 631 views | felixstowe_jack |
Just because piers did not believe her account does not make him a racist.
Poor Megan could not even remember her wedding day correctly. Not sure i would trust anyone with a memory that bad. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Piers Morgan on 19:38 - Mar 29 with 600 views | pencoedjack |
| Piers Morgan on 17:38 - Mar 29 by felixstowe_jack |
Just because piers did not believe her account does not make him a racist.
Poor Megan could not even remember her wedding day correctly. Not sure i would trust anyone with a memory that bad. |
Well I don’t believe her either & I can assure you I’m not a racist. |  | | |
| Piers Morgan on 19:50 - Mar 29 with 597 views | raynor94 |
If she said Good Morning, I'd check my watch |  |
| |
| Piers Morgan on 20:14 - Mar 29 with 591 views | Catullus |
It's a hard thing to read, not because Piers is a loud mouthed gobshite but the part where Alex Beresford says it doesn't matter if there was no racism it's her lived experience so should be respected.
Just what the feck is that about, we have to respect what she says even if it' a lie? What utter woke nonsense.
Meghan had the freedom to say what she wanted but it seems that same freedom of speech is being denied to people who don't believe her. That is the new world order. An accusation means guilt, a denial means guilt regardless of any evidence or lack of it. | |
| |
| Piers Morgan on 16:51 - Mar 31 with 505 views | pencoedjack |
No marriage prior to the main event & the nipper never destined to be a prince.
She is a publicity (when it suits) hungry liar. | | | |
| Piers Morgan on 17:07 - Mar 31 with 498 views | britferry |
| Piers Morgan on 16:51 - Mar 31 by pencoedjack |
No marriage prior to the main event & the nipper never destined to be a prince.
She is a publicity (when it suits) hungry liar. |
Charlie boy has always said he wants to streamline the royal family... who out there knows anything about the likes of the Dukes of Kent or Gloucester, let alone the Ogilvy's ?
Which is why Harry's brats won't be getting any titles.
btw. they're the Queens first cousins, which is what H's kids will be once George becomes king | |
| |
| Piers Morgan on 17:18 - Mar 31 with 485 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Piers Morgan on 17:07 - Mar 31 by britferry |
Charlie boy has always said he wants to streamline the royal family... who out there knows anything about the likes of the Dukes of Kent or Gloucester, let alone the Ogilvy's ?
Which is why Harry's brats won't be getting any titles.
btw. they're the Queens first cousins, which is what H's kids will be once George becomes king |
You mean Prince Richard, the Duke of Gloucester, or Prince Edward, the Duke of Kent? Or Princess Alexandra, who is married to Angus Ogilvy (she’s the cousin, not him).
You may want to find different examples to show grandchildren of a monarch that aren’t given the title ‘Prince’ or ‘Princess’.
The only example (to save you looking) are Princess Anne’s kids and Prince Edward’s kids - in both cases it was by express refusal by the parents. All were offered. If Harry’s children are not offered the title it will be the first time a monarch’s grandchildren are not offered the title prince or princess.
I agree it’s to do with streamlining, but the optics are probably not great given the circumstances.
As I’ve said before, I’d get rid of every single one of them. | | | |
| Piers Morgan on 17:32 - Mar 31 with 478 views | felixstowe_jack |
| Piers Morgan on 17:18 - Mar 31 by londonlisa2001 |
You mean Prince Richard, the Duke of Gloucester, or Prince Edward, the Duke of Kent? Or Princess Alexandra, who is married to Angus Ogilvy (she’s the cousin, not him).
You may want to find different examples to show grandchildren of a monarch that aren’t given the title ‘Prince’ or ‘Princess’.
The only example (to save you looking) are Princess Anne’s kids and Prince Edward’s kids - in both cases it was by express refusal by the parents. All were offered. If Harry’s children are not offered the title it will be the first time a monarch’s grandchildren are not offered the title prince or princess.
I agree it’s to do with streamlining, but the optics are probably not great given the circumstances.
As I’ve said before, I’d get rid of every single one of them. |
Harry's children are the Queen's great grandchildren not her grandchildren.
It only custom to bestow the title of prince princess on her grandchildren.
William's children get the title because his father Charles and William himself are directly in line of succession. | |
| |
| Piers Morgan on 17:36 - Mar 31 with 473 views | onehunglow |
Even I knew that Felix
Sheesh | |
| |
| Piers Morgan on 17:49 - Mar 31 with 468 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Piers Morgan on 17:32 - Mar 31 by felixstowe_jack |
Harry's children are the Queen's great grandchildren not her grandchildren.
It only custom to bestow the title of prince princess on her grandchildren.
William's children get the title because his father Charles and William himself are directly in line of succession. |
Yes, we all know that.
The discussion was about whether they would get the title on the Queen’s death. That’s what Harry & Meghan were referring to.
Strictly, by the way, only George should have the title until the Queen’s death as well. The others were granted them (again, unlike Harry’s kid). They have no more automatic right to it than he does. | | | |
| Piers Morgan on 18:49 - Mar 31 with 458 views | britferry |
| Piers Morgan on 17:18 - Mar 31 by londonlisa2001 |
You mean Prince Richard, the Duke of Gloucester, or Prince Edward, the Duke of Kent? Or Princess Alexandra, who is married to Angus Ogilvy (she’s the cousin, not him).
You may want to find different examples to show grandchildren of a monarch that aren’t given the title ‘Prince’ or ‘Princess’.
The only example (to save you looking) are Princess Anne’s kids and Prince Edward’s kids - in both cases it was by express refusal by the parents. All were offered. If Harry’s children are not offered the title it will be the first time a monarch’s grandchildren are not offered the title prince or princess.
I agree it’s to do with streamlining, but the optics are probably not great given the circumstances.
As I’ve said before, I’d get rid of every single one of them. |
yes I know all that but most don't have a clue who they are but yet they have royal titles.
Perhaps somebody should have explained that to Markle prior to the Oprah lies | |
| |
| Piers Morgan on 18:59 - Mar 31 with 445 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Piers Morgan on 18:49 - Mar 31 by britferry |
yes I know all that but most don't have a clue who they are but yet they have royal titles.
Perhaps somebody should have explained that to Markle prior to the Oprah lies |
That was her point though. Her kid is being treated differently to all the scores of others. The fact there are loads of them who do whatever they do is one of the reasons I would get rid of them all. | | | |
| Piers Morgan on 19:23 - Mar 31 with 441 views | britferry |
| Piers Morgan on 18:59 - Mar 31 by londonlisa2001 |
That was her point though. Her kid is being treated differently to all the scores of others. The fact there are loads of them who do whatever they do is one of the reasons I would get rid of them all. |
she's married to the spare... perhaps she should have googled him | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.