| Trump indicted 06:05 - Mar 31 with 6633 views | SullutaCreturned |
The first president to face criminal charges then. No doubt he will find a way to use it to his advantage. |  | | |  |
| Trump indicted on 18:34 - Apr 1 with 1603 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trump indicted on 18:29 - Apr 1 by majorraglan |
I don’t know why you bother to be honest, he might be a tidy guy in real life, but on here he often comes across as someone who’s got an opinion on everything and who thinks he’s always right. I’ll probably hit the ignore feature. |
Isn’t it funny all the left wingers are throwing their toys out of the pram the second their previous nonsense gets put in the spotlight.
You are another who commented on the thread regarding the Capitol storming, yet couldn’t bring yourself to condemn it.
Yes please, anyone who is unable to string honest sentences together I would recommend hitting the ignore button. Your posts will be torn to shreds in seconds otherwise, I’m pretty ruthless.
Let’s save some time and hit the button, I refer to it as my moron bin. The fuller it is, the higher the standard of debate in the future. |  |
| |
| Trump indicted on 22:03 - Apr 1 with 1580 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
If he gets elected whilst in prison he could immediately pardon himself anyway. |  |
| |
| Trump indicted on 07:32 - Apr 2 with 1549 views | Kilkennyjack |
| Trump indicted on 22:03 - Apr 1 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
If he gets elected whilst in prison he could immediately pardon himself anyway. |
But not really.
The Constitution only grants the ability to pardon people of federal crimes, so even if the courts found that the president could pardon himself, it would not excuse him from violations of state laws, several of which he is in danger of being prosecuted for.
Tick tock MF …. |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Trump indicted on 00:21 - Apr 3 with 1470 views | controversial_jack |
| Trump indicted on 18:34 - Apr 1 by Dr_Parnassus |
Isn’t it funny all the left wingers are throwing their toys out of the pram the second their previous nonsense gets put in the spotlight.
You are another who commented on the thread regarding the Capitol storming, yet couldn’t bring yourself to condemn it.
Yes please, anyone who is unable to string honest sentences together I would recommend hitting the ignore button. Your posts will be torn to shreds in seconds otherwise, I’m pretty ruthless.
Let’s save some time and hit the button, I refer to it as my moron bin. The fuller it is, the higher the standard of debate in the future. |
As a left winger i'm loving it. | | | |
| Trump indicted on 01:13 - Apr 3 with 1468 views | Kilkennyjack |
Quite right - lock him up.
 | |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Trump indicted on 03:46 - Apr 3 with 1429 views | Dr_Parnassus |
And that is the difference between the left and those perceived as being on the right.
I don’t think we had a single person happy with Jan 6th, it was called out as unacceptable from both sides.
The second the left do it, multiple times over, there is absolute silence from the left, some are more honest like yourself and openly say you are delighted that Capitol buildings are being stormed in multiple states to try and overrule a bill to stop children going under the knife to mutilate their bodies - which seems to be a good Bill considering a lot of children believe in Santa and also want to grow up to be vampires and werewolves, it’s an adult decision.
This is why I shine a light on these things, because the mirror image of the reaction of both the left and right is absolutely stark. [Post edited 20 Jun 2023 16:48]
| |
| |
| Trump indicted on 03:52 - Apr 3 with 1426 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trump indicted on 01:13 - Apr 3 by Kilkennyjack |
Quite right - lock him up.
|
And back in the real world away from fake pictures, he was with Brooks Koepka on the golf course.
 | |
| |
| Trump indicted on 16:05 - Apr 3 with 1419 views | SullutaCreturned |
| Trump indicted on 18:29 - Apr 1 by majorraglan |
I don’t know why you bother to be honest, he might be a tidy guy in real life, but on here he often comes across as someone who’s got an opinion on everything and who thinks he’s always right. I’ll probably hit the ignore feature. |
Because it's fun for a while!
For example, he calls me partisan like it's an insult and as if I only say things about Trump, both of which are not true.
He himself is very partisan to Trump, an obvious right winger who cannot see the position he takes as anything other than common sense. He's lost in his own little world and that's why so many do ignore him because ( and despite extreme competition from 1 or 2 others) he is the most predictable and voring poster on here.
I have pointed out a fact to him about the indictment but still he demands it is only a misdemeanor, it may be true but he has no way of knowing.
Not doubt if a felony is involved he'll insist it's wrong and he is right because that's what he does.
In saying all that though, you are right, all he really deserves is ignoring. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Trump indicted on 22:18 - Apr 3 with 1328 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trump indicted on 16:05 - Apr 3 by SullutaCreturned |
Because it's fun for a while!
For example, he calls me partisan like it's an insult and as if I only say things about Trump, both of which are not true.
He himself is very partisan to Trump, an obvious right winger who cannot see the position he takes as anything other than common sense. He's lost in his own little world and that's why so many do ignore him because ( and despite extreme competition from 1 or 2 others) he is the most predictable and voring poster on here.
I have pointed out a fact to him about the indictment but still he demands it is only a misdemeanor, it may be true but he has no way of knowing.
Not doubt if a felony is involved he'll insist it's wrong and he is right because that's what he does.
In saying all that though, you are right, all he really deserves is ignoring. |
You are partisan, one of the most partisan at that. Not meant as an insult, but you take it as one because it destroys your “I’m neutral” schtick.
Trump sneezes and you are either creating a thread or contributing to it trying to accuse him of intentionally speeding Covid - or whatever ridiculous spin you and others put on literally anything he does.
Biden/Pelosi or whomever can do what they like and you will say absolutely nothing, you may condemn it if backed into a corner and you feel forced into it in order to save face.
We saw 12 months of rioting from the Dems and the left and you said zero - until you were essentially made to in order to back your reaction to Jan 6th.
Because when Republicans entered the Capitol building to protest, you pretended it was a Trump led siege… the same happened over the last few days from the left/dems, several times over, and you simply say you agree with them - despite them lobbying to mutilate children.
You keep telling everyone how many are ignoring me, but I don’t believe any more than about 3 morons I regularly destroy are on that list and am almost certainly the most read and replied to poster in this sites history.
I understand it makes you think you have support in your quest against me by creating this fantasy ignoring list, but as double poster of the year - the evidence is against you.
Make it 4 and save yourself further embarrassment. | |
| |
| Trump indicted on 08:32 - Apr 4 with 1288 views | Kilkennyjack |
A felony carries 12 months or more in prison.
Tick tock MF. [Post edited 4 Apr 2023 8:32]
| |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Trump indicted on 13:23 - Apr 4 with 1224 views | SullutaCreturned |
| Trump indicted on 22:18 - Apr 3 by Dr_Parnassus |
You are partisan, one of the most partisan at that. Not meant as an insult, but you take it as one because it destroys your “I’m neutral” schtick.
Trump sneezes and you are either creating a thread or contributing to it trying to accuse him of intentionally speeding Covid - or whatever ridiculous spin you and others put on literally anything he does.
Biden/Pelosi or whomever can do what they like and you will say absolutely nothing, you may condemn it if backed into a corner and you feel forced into it in order to save face.
We saw 12 months of rioting from the Dems and the left and you said zero - until you were essentially made to in order to back your reaction to Jan 6th.
Because when Republicans entered the Capitol building to protest, you pretended it was a Trump led siege… the same happened over the last few days from the left/dems, several times over, and you simply say you agree with them - despite them lobbying to mutilate children.
You keep telling everyone how many are ignoring me, but I don’t believe any more than about 3 morons I regularly destroy are on that list and am almost certainly the most read and replied to poster in this sites history.
I understand it makes you think you have support in your quest against me by creating this fantasy ignoring list, but as double poster of the year - the evidence is against you.
Make it 4 and save yourself further embarrassment. |
So has he been charged with a misdemeanor or a felony then? Is it now the case that a felony is low level nonsense?
Now that you have been proved badly wrong (assuming reorts are right) you are now saying an E felony is low level nonsesne whereas you were insisting he'd be charged with a misdemeanor.
You posted nonsense, a fabricatin in partisan defence of your man and you have been proved wrong.
As usual the rest of what you posted was arrogant, errant nonsense.
How do you spin being badly wrong, by calling other people morons, no change by you there, always close to the mark but careful not to overstep it.
Maybe you need to find something more important to do, there's lots out there. or maybe you should try some introspection and realise that claiming to be "always right" and demanding you are the best poster on a football forum is absolutely ridiculous and for most people, they'd read it back to themselves and be embarrased. You lack that intelligence though.
There's life away from the keyboard fella, try living it. | | | |
| Trump indicted on 17:50 - Apr 4 with 1143 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trump indicted on 13:23 - Apr 4 by SullutaCreturned |
So has he been charged with a misdemeanor or a felony then? Is it now the case that a felony is low level nonsense?
Now that you have been proved badly wrong (assuming reorts are right) you are now saying an E felony is low level nonsesne whereas you were insisting he'd be charged with a misdemeanor.
You posted nonsense, a fabricatin in partisan defence of your man and you have been proved wrong.
As usual the rest of what you posted was arrogant, errant nonsense.
How do you spin being badly wrong, by calling other people morons, no change by you there, always close to the mark but careful not to overstep it.
Maybe you need to find something more important to do, there's lots out there. or maybe you should try some introspection and realise that claiming to be "always right" and demanding you are the best poster on a football forum is absolutely ridiculous and for most people, they'd read it back to themselves and be embarrased. You lack that intelligence though.
There's life away from the keyboard fella, try living it. |
What on earth are you wibbling on about now?
That’s the thing with you. You get so excited you can’t even follow a basic discussion. Not for the first time, let me explain to you our conversation.
Dr P: “This is politically motivated and low level tabloid-like allegations”.
Cat: “Why, if he’s guilty he’s guilty”.
Dr P: “Because literally nobody else would be indicted. It’s politically motivated which is far more scary than paying off a porn star. Low level tabloid nonsense”.
Cat: “It’s nothing to do with paying off a porn star, it’s to do with falsifying the payments and listing it as a legal cost”.
Dr P: “Falsifying records in the state of NY is a low level misdemeanour. So as I said it’s low level nonsense”.
Cat: “If they find other things then they may upgrade it to a felony, how do you know it’s a misdemeanour?”.
Dr P: “I’m going off what you told me, which was falsifying records.”.
That’s it, there was no claiming or predictions surrounding what he would be charged with. I only stated it was low level nonsense (which it is) and that your version was a misdemeanour (which it is).
What has confused you here Cat? I know it doesn’t take much, and especially in your partisan leftist anti-Trump world - but you don’t half make it easy for me.
So regardless of all your crying and venting about me - you still got it wrong.
By the way I never once claimed to be the best poster on the site, stop lying.
I just factually told you that the evidence against what you desperately try to say about me is stark considering I’m voted poster of the year (double there of, if you discount the cheating). I deal in facts, not your fantasy ignore list stuff to give you comfort. Nothing embarrassing about facts, Champ.
 [Post edited 4 Apr 2023 18:09]
| |
| |
| Trump indicted on 17:56 - Apr 4 with 1141 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Here you go Cat, I’ve done the donkey work for you.
Have a read through the correspondence you refer to and tell me which part is incorrect.
Maybe instead of bumping your gums every 2 minutes about things you don’t understand. Take a step back, understand what you are being told and actually take the opportunity to learn from people that know far more than you ever could.
Enjoy. | |
| |
| Trump indicted on 18:28 - Apr 4 with 1137 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
Although we don't know the charges yet, this feels like it will a long drawn out legal process with lots of challenges and delays. |  |
| |
| Trump indicted on 19:34 - Apr 4 with 1104 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trump indicted on 19:17 - Apr 4 by Kilkennyjack |
🤷â€â™‚ï¸ |
What did she tell us? | |
| |
| Trump indicted on 20:11 - Apr 4 with 1092 views | SullutaCreturned |
WOW, charged with 34 FELONIES, not a misdemeanor in sight. Spin that one ironbark....
34 felonies and all must be low level nonsense according to one poster on here.
Somewhere must be running out of mud by now? | | | |
| Trump indicted on 23:46 - Apr 4 with 1020 views | Boundy |
| Trump indicted on 20:11 - Apr 4 by SullutaCreturned |
WOW, charged with 34 FELONIES, not a misdemeanor in sight. Spin that one ironbark....
34 felonies and all must be low level nonsense according to one poster on here.
Somewhere must be running out of mud by now? |
New York's district attorney, Alvin Bragg office bumped the charges from misdemeanors to Class E felonies on the grounds that the conduct was intended to conceal another underlying crime, the report said, citing an unnamed source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ | |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| Trump indicted on 05:45 - Apr 5 with 989 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trump indicted on 20:11 - Apr 4 by SullutaCreturned |
WOW, charged with 34 FELONIES, not a misdemeanor in sight. Spin that one ironbark....
34 felonies and all must be low level nonsense according to one poster on here.
Somewhere must be running out of mud by now? |
Haven’t we just been through that, Dory?
 | |
| |
| Trump indicted on 07:22 - Apr 5 with 982 views | SullutaCreturned |
| Trump indicted on 17:56 - Apr 4 by Dr_Parnassus |
Here you go Cat, I’ve done the donkey work for you.
Have a read through the correspondence you refer to and tell me which part is incorrect.
Maybe instead of bumping your gums every 2 minutes about things you don’t understand. Take a step back, understand what you are being told and actually take the opportunity to learn from people that know far more than you ever could.
Enjoy. |
These were YOUR words,
"Of course it’s low level nonsense, it’s listed as a misdemeanour. Even if found guilty the jail time is unlikely, that’s the level of ‘crime’ we are talking about here."
You must have forgotten to edit that one eh, it's really dumb editing a post and trying to to change what you said BUT you missed where you claimed it was listed as a misdemeanor eh, 34 felonies, wow.
You must know everubody can see you've editied your posts? it makes you look very silly.
You should be a politician, you're very well suited to modern politics, not as bright as you think you are and full of blather and bluster.
34 FELONIES. It must really hurt you so much to be proved wrong that you edit your posts and try to re-write your words in a lame attempt to prove yourself right.
Oh well, at least your man won't go to prison eh. | | | |
| Trump indicted on 07:41 - Apr 5 with 969 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trump indicted on 07:22 - Apr 5 by SullutaCreturned |
These were YOUR words,
"Of course it’s low level nonsense, it’s listed as a misdemeanour. Even if found guilty the jail time is unlikely, that’s the level of ‘crime’ we are talking about here."
You must have forgotten to edit that one eh, it's really dumb editing a post and trying to to change what you said BUT you missed where you claimed it was listed as a misdemeanor eh, 34 felonies, wow.
You must know everubody can see you've editied your posts? it makes you look very silly.
You should be a politician, you're very well suited to modern politics, not as bright as you think you are and full of blather and bluster.
34 FELONIES. It must really hurt you so much to be proved wrong that you edit your posts and try to re-write your words in a lame attempt to prove yourself right.
Oh well, at least your man won't go to prison eh. |
Yes, because YOUR words were “it’s nothing to do with paying off a porn start it’s to do with falsifying records”.
I made it clear that what you are describing is a low level misdemeanour. After being taught that, you then walked that back and said “we don’t know what the charges are”.
I then said, whatever adaptations they make it will still be low level nonsense.
Which posts have I edited? Show me.
You have just realised you got completely flummoxed and are now claiming I’ve edited them, when in reality I didn’t say anything of which you claim.
Be better Cat, put this down as a lesson. You simply cannot converse on my level. | |
| |
| Trump indicted on 07:53 - Apr 5 with 951 views | Dr_Parnassus |
My edited posts for Dory, who is now crossing into Pinocchio territory because he got it all wrong…
Edited post 1:
31 minutes after posting, added highlighting for ease of reading.
Edited post 2:
3 minutes after posting, added emphasis on the final line that it is low level nonsense.
So… which posts have I gone back and changed Pinocchio?
You have to be far better than that to try and get one past me. You clearly thought I made some prediction, when in fact all I did was respond to what you described - nothing more.
There is no amount of lying about edited posts that can get you out of that, when it obvious to all that anything I edit is edited within moments of posting and certainly do not “go back” and edit as you are trying to fraudulently claim.
QED (look it up). | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.