By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Vitor on the weekend on 19:21 - Aug 20 by JJBomber
Avoided every question. He belongs in the Houses of Parliament!
I completely disagree. I thought he answered every question with a straight bat, said looking for a midfielder, said looking to add to the back. Said Bianchini is not in his plans and needs to find a club. Only think he was ever so slightly coy on was whether the club would cash in on Vip or whether he's still being with us when the window closes. He's not going to be stupid enough to say he'll 100% be here when we all know if the right offer comes in we'll sell.
I thought it was a decent response although some of the questions were too predictable, where are the other Journalists???
1
Vitor on the weekend on 00:20 - Aug 21 with 1058 views
I completely disagree. I thought he answered every question with a straight bat, said looking for a midfielder, said looking to add to the back. Said Bianchini is not in his plans and needs to find a club. Only think he was ever so slightly coy on was whether the club would cash in on Vip or whether he's still being with us when the window closes. He's not going to be stupid enough to say he'll 100% be here when we all know if the right offer comes in we'll sell.
I thought it was a decent response although some of the questions were too predictable, where are the other Journalists???
I am with you, I think Victor went further than I would have. I certainly would not discuss Bianchini in such detail. The journalist does not seem to realise how transfer dealings take place or the fact that Matos is not the man making all the decisions here. At this stage transfers are like a game of chess with every likely option covered in more than one direction. If player A leaves then will have a number of possibilities to cover player A. If player A and player B leaves there will be lots of options for covering this depending on the deals involved. There will a long list of possible acquisitions together with fee and salary limits. Asking a question like is VP going is pointless because the answer is that depends on a whole load of things. If you watch the interview carefully you'll see Matos laughing in immediate response to some of the questions before going on to answer the question.
Vitor on the weekend on 00:20 - Aug 21 by JACKMANANDBOY
I am with you, I think Victor went further than I would have. I certainly would not discuss Bianchini in such detail. The journalist does not seem to realise how transfer dealings take place or the fact that Matos is not the man making all the decisions here. At this stage transfers are like a game of chess with every likely option covered in more than one direction. If player A leaves then will have a number of possibilities to cover player A. If player A and player B leaves there will be lots of options for covering this depending on the deals involved. There will a long list of possible acquisitions together with fee and salary limits. Asking a question like is VP going is pointless because the answer is that depends on a whole load of things. If you watch the interview carefully you'll see Matos laughing in immediate response to some of the questions before going on to answer the question.
[Post edited 21 Aug 9:50]
The interviewer is not very good and just a puppet ticking the boxes, in no way shape or form can he be called a journalist.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.