What is wrong here? on 18:29 - Jul 28 with 1028 views | Jackfath | Seems right to me. | |
| |
What is wrong here? on 18:34 - Jul 28 with 1011 views | JackoBoostardo |
What is wrong here? on 18:29 - Jul 28 by Jackfath | Seems right to me. |
troll troll is obvious troll you get more leaving a dog in a hot car! | |
| |
What is wrong here? on 18:42 - Jul 28 with 971 views | Jackfath |
What is wrong here? on 18:34 - Jul 28 by JackoBoostardo | troll troll is obvious troll you get more leaving a dog in a hot car! |
Any more than a caution would have meant a disruption to the young child's life. Would that have been more satisying for all the people who are making stupid comparisons on the EP website? | |
| |
What is wrong here? on 18:56 - Jul 28 with 944 views | exiledclaseboy |
What is wrong here? on 18:42 - Jul 28 by Jackfath | Any more than a caution would have meant a disruption to the young child's life. Would that have been more satisying for all the people who are making stupid comparisons on the EP website? |
Almost as daft as Prosser's machete laden comparison on the McKormick thread last night. Anyhoo, caution seems lenient but I'd imagine the police have taken the decision in consultation with social services taking into account the family's circumstances. Also of course, the police/CPS have to consider whether it's in the public interest to bring a prosecution. Not sure who would have gained from that. All that said, I still can't get my head around why anyone would do that. | |
| |
What is wrong here? on 18:59 - Jul 28 with 924 views | Darran |
What is wrong here? on 18:56 - Jul 28 by exiledclaseboy | Almost as daft as Prosser's machete laden comparison on the McKormick thread last night. Anyhoo, caution seems lenient but I'd imagine the police have taken the decision in consultation with social services taking into account the family's circumstances. Also of course, the police/CPS have to consider whether it's in the public interest to bring a prosecution. Not sure who would have gained from that. All that said, I still can't get my head around why anyone would do that. |
There's f*ck all wrong with my comparison Bruv. Machete = Deadly weapon. Pissed up in charge of a high powered vehicle = Deadly weapon. | |
| |
What is wrong here? on 19:00 - Jul 28 with 913 views | exiledclaseboy |
What is wrong here? on 18:59 - Jul 28 by Darran | There's f*ck all wrong with my comparison Bruv. Machete = Deadly weapon. Pissed up in charge of a high powered vehicle = Deadly weapon. |
Whatever bro. | |
| |
What is wrong here? on 19:02 - Jul 28 with 910 views | Darran |
Do one Dude. | |
| |
What is wrong here? on 14:01 - Jul 29 with 782 views | JackoBoostardo |
What is wrong here? on 18:42 - Jul 28 by Jackfath | Any more than a caution would have meant a disruption to the young child's life. Would that have been more satisying for all the people who are making stupid comparisons on the EP website? |
More of a disruption than death? If nobody had intervened, who's to say this wouldn't have happened? And who's to say it won't happen again. If the parents are incapable of looking after, or using their noggin, around their young kids, then they're clearly unfit parents. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
What is wrong here? on 16:15 - Jul 29 with 680 views | Catullus |
What is wrong here? on 18:56 - Jul 28 by exiledclaseboy | Almost as daft as Prosser's machete laden comparison on the McKormick thread last night. Anyhoo, caution seems lenient but I'd imagine the police have taken the decision in consultation with social services taking into account the family's circumstances. Also of course, the police/CPS have to consider whether it's in the public interest to bring a prosecution. Not sure who would have gained from that. All that said, I still can't get my head around why anyone would do that. |
Because we all trust the social services? And never mind public interest, what about the childs interests? The kid could have died, I don't think the mother is responsible enough to look after her. Lets just hope the authorities got this right and we don't end up with another avoidable tragedy! You may have guessed, I think a caution was much too lenient. | |
| |
What is wrong here? on 20:13 - Jul 29 with 567 views | Bovi |
What is wrong here? on 18:29 - Jul 28 by Jackfath | Seems right to me. |
There We Are Then | |
| What's wrong with saying Mong's ? |
| |
What is wrong here? on 20:25 - Jul 29 with 547 views | Jackfath |
What is wrong here? on 20:13 - Jul 29 by Bovi | There We Are Then |
Steady on Bovi. If you carry on you'll get told to stop posting here again by your carers. | |
| |
What is wrong here? on 20:45 - Jul 29 with 505 views | JackoBoostardo |
What is wrong here? on 20:25 - Jul 29 by Jackfath | Steady on Bovi. If you carry on you'll get told to stop posting here again by your carers. |
Fuk it! As you were Bovi! | |
| |
What is wrong here? on 20:48 - Jul 29 with 493 views | dickythorpe | Hopefully this woman will have learnt a lesson. Somehow I doubt it I'm afraid. Why wasnt she named and shamed? [Post edited 29 Jul 2014 20:53]
| | | |
What is wrong here? on 20:55 - Jul 29 with 484 views | exiledclaseboy |
What is wrong here? on 20:48 - Jul 29 by dickythorpe | Hopefully this woman will have learnt a lesson. Somehow I doubt it I'm afraid. Why wasnt she named and shamed? [Post edited 29 Jul 2014 20:53]
|
Probably because doing so would have identified the child. Or some divvy would have tried to take a pop at her in the street. | |
| |
What is wrong here? on 20:59 - Jul 29 with 471 views | dickythorpe |
What is wrong here? on 20:55 - Jul 29 by exiledclaseboy | Probably because doing so would have identified the child. Or some divvy would have tried to take a pop at her in the street. |
You are probably right ECB. May I say she might have deserved some verbals? | | | |
What is wrong here? on 21:01 - Jul 29 with 463 views | exiledclaseboy |
What is wrong here? on 20:59 - Jul 29 by dickythorpe | You are probably right ECB. May I say she might have deserved some verbals? |
You may indeed say that. | |
| |
| |