| World Health Organisation 11:49 - Jun 30 with 723 views | RonaldStump |
Advising that if you have become part of the experiment and had both jabs. All the same restrictions will apply to you, it'll only compliment the other "tools" the WHO has for you. These words came straight from the horses mouth.
I do recall '15 million jabs to freedom" "we'll be free by February"
The two tier system for the have's and the have nots
Does anybody still really believe this is about public health? |  |
| |  |
| World Health Organisation on 11:55 - Jun 30 with 714 views | felixstowe_jack |
As opposed to the experiment of refusing the vaccines and seeing how many people get the virus, are hospitalised and die.
The evidence seems pretty clear very few vaccinated people going to hospital and dying compared to January and February. 95% of those catching it are unvaccinated.
Think that proves which experiment has had the better outcome. | |
| |
| World Health Organisation on 11:57 - Jun 30 with 704 views | RonaldStump |
| World Health Organisation on 11:55 - Jun 30 by felixstowe_jack |
As opposed to the experiment of refusing the vaccines and seeing how many people get the virus, are hospitalised and die.
The evidence seems pretty clear very few vaccinated people going to hospital and dying compared to January and February. 95% of those catching it are unvaccinated.
Think that proves which experiment has had the better outcome. |
Lets see where we are this time next year
https://www.theguardian.com/th | |
| |
| World Health Organisation on 13:32 - Jun 30 with 675 views | Catullus |
Have you got a link to what the W.H.O. said? I have trust issues!
People who have had only one jab are at an increased risk but two jabs still gives you greater protection than none. What you say about people dying is taken out of context, you have to remember most of the people who have both jabs are the more elderly or clinically higher risk, their chances of dying are a fair bit higher anyway.
The Delta variant has been making younger people more ill too. New variants could be even nore dangerous to younger people. | |
| |
| World Health Organisation on 14:21 - Jun 30 with 655 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| World Health Organisation on 11:55 - Jun 30 by felixstowe_jack |
As opposed to the experiment of refusing the vaccines and seeing how many people get the virus, are hospitalised and die.
The evidence seems pretty clear very few vaccinated people going to hospital and dying compared to January and February. 95% of those catching it are unvaccinated.
Think that proves which experiment has had the better outcome. |
95%?
 | | | |
| World Health Organisation on 14:57 - Jun 30 with 641 views | Scotia |
| World Health Organisation on 14:21 - Jun 30 by A_Fans_Dad |
95%?
|
Fair point. According to your stats those infected after receiving two doses was 13% of the figure who contracted it after not being vaccinated at all.
87% v 95% I don't think it real matters. I know which 13% or 5% of the population I'd rather be in. | | | |
| World Health Organisation on 15:49 - Jun 30 with 625 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| World Health Organisation on 14:57 - Jun 30 by Scotia |
Fair point. According to your stats those infected after receiving two doses was 13% of the figure who contracted it after not being vaccinated at all.
87% v 95% I don't think it real matters. I know which 13% or 5% of the population I'd rather be in. |
Really, wow.
You also like to ignore the single vaccinated as well.
You would rather be in a group standing 6 times the chance of dying.
Yes, that sounds like your logic and understanding of stats. | | | |
| World Health Organisation on 16:08 - Jun 30 with 619 views | Scotia |
| World Health Organisation on 15:49 - Jun 30 by A_Fans_Dad |
Really, wow.
You also like to ignore the single vaccinated as well.
You would rather be in a group standing 6 times the chance of dying.
Yes, that sounds like your logic and understanding of stats. |
Ok we'll include the single dose. They amounted to 67% according to your figures if I remember correctly.
The deaths have been explained. The extremely vulnerable had their vaccines first. Do you think somebody in palliative care or aged 90 plus has a fully functioning immune system? | | | |
| World Health Organisation on 16:17 - Jun 30 with 611 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| World Health Organisation on 16:08 - Jun 30 by Scotia |
Ok we'll include the single dose. They amounted to 67% according to your figures if I remember correctly.
The deaths have been explained. The extremely vulnerable had their vaccines first. Do you think somebody in palliative care or aged 90 plus has a fully functioning immune system? |
No, it has not been explained, unless you have access to the actual number at age and with what co-morbities they have, that no one else seems to possess.
The only thing stated was "under 50" or "over 50" for both groups.
So do you have the data or are you lying? [Post edited 30 Jun 2021 16:58]
| | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| World Health Organisation on 17:30 - Jun 30 with 594 views | Professor |
| World Health Organisation on 16:08 - Jun 30 by Scotia |
Ok we'll include the single dose. They amounted to 67% according to your figures if I remember correctly.
The deaths have been explained. The extremely vulnerable had their vaccines first. Do you think somebody in palliative care or aged 90 plus has a fully functioning immune system? |
The ONS data is pretty unequivocal that most infections are under 30s, and that rises in the groups that have had the second vaccines have been curtailed. Most are now in age 5-35.
Deaths are in the vulnerable. These are people not numbers, but someone fails to see that. | | | |
| World Health Organisation on 17:41 - Jun 30 with 592 views | max936 |
| World Health Organisation on 17:30 - Jun 30 by Professor |
The ONS data is pretty unequivocal that most infections are under 30s, and that rises in the groups that have had the second vaccines have been curtailed. Most are now in age 5-35.
Deaths are in the vulnerable. These are people not numbers, but someone fails to see that. |
My youngest is in the high group of vulnerability by looks of it, he's had his two jobs, but probably still isn't safe, them  |  |
| |
| World Health Organisation on 19:03 - Jun 30 with 565 views | britferry |
| World Health Organisation on 13:32 - Jun 30 by Catullus |
Have you got a link to what the W.H.O. said? I have trust issues!
People who have had only one jab are at an increased risk but two jabs still gives you greater protection than none. What you say about people dying is taken out of context, you have to remember most of the people who have both jabs are the more elderly or clinically higher risk, their chances of dying are a fair bit higher anyway.
The Delta variant has been making younger people more ill too. New variants could be even nore dangerous to younger people. |
they said they Won't Get Fooled Again | |
| |
| World Health Organisation on 20:29 - Jun 30 with 534 views | Scotia |
| World Health Organisation on 19:03 - Jun 30 by britferry |
they said they Won't Get Fooled Again |
They also said "I hope I die before I get old" :)
I don't I'm middle aged and it's a bit shit at the moment. I hope this is a distant memory when I'm old. | | | |
| World Health Organisation on 20:51 - Jun 30 with 527 views | Professor |
| World Health Organisation on 20:29 - Jun 30 by Scotia |
They also said "I hope I die before I get old" :)
I don't I'm middle aged and it's a bit shit at the moment. I hope this is a distant memory when I'm old. |
The kids are alright, though. | | | |
| World Health Organisation on 23:47 - Jun 30 with 501 views | controversial_jack |
Can they see for miles and miles? | | | |
| World Health Organisation on 10:44 - Jul 1 with 443 views | Professor |
| World Health Organisation on 23:47 - Jun 30 by controversial_jack |
Can they see for miles and miles? |
If you can, then you would be a "Happy Jack'. | | | |
| World Health Organisation on 10:45 - Jul 1 with 441 views | Scotia |
| World Health Organisation on 10:44 - Jul 1 by Professor |
If you can, then you would be a "Happy Jack'. |
"I'm one"
Despite previous post ;) | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
