| Giggs 15:42 - Aug 31 with 1995 views | raynor94 |
Jury discharged, couldn't reach a verdict.
Interesting to see if the prosecution want to do it again |  |
| |  |
| Giggs on 15:46 - Aug 31 with 1410 views | Sirjohnalot |
Be surprised if they did not. Will depend a lot on the view of the complainant. May be sensible to drop the control and coercive Count and continue just with the assaults |  | | |
| Giggs on 15:47 - Aug 31 with 1408 views | KeithHaynes |
Can’t see it mate. Time this has taken has been mad. |  |
| |
| Giggs on 15:50 - Aug 31 with 1399 views | hobo |
Both as bad as eachother it sounds like |  | | |
| Giggs on 15:51 - Aug 31 with 1394 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
After a trial that has lasted weeks all the evidence and testimonies submitted and the jury still can’t reach a verdict then surely the prosecution hasn’t made their case beyond reasonable doubt. They shouldn’t be able to have another go at it with another jury.
Having said that though the defence hasn’t made their case beyond reasonable doubt either. What a mess. |  |
| |
| Giggs on 15:51 - Aug 31 with 1394 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Giggs on 15:47 - Aug 31 by KeithHaynes |
Can’t see it mate. Time this has taken has been mad. |
It's not long for a trial at all, but his barrister is privately paid, we were saying in Court the other day, had this been legal aid, it would have taken less than a week.
1 day for lost due to jury illness and another for the bank holiday. | | | |
| Giggs on 15:57 - Aug 31 with 1383 views | YrAlarch |
| Giggs on 15:51 - Aug 31 by Sirjohnalot |
It's not long for a trial at all, but his barrister is privately paid, we were saying in Court the other day, had this been legal aid, it would have taken less than a week.
1 day for lost due to jury illness and another for the bank holiday. |
Meanwhile a 13 year old girl is having to wait 3 years for the trial of the accused for her rape. Justice eh! |  | | |
| Giggs on 16:10 - Aug 31 with 1352 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Giggs on 15:57 - Aug 31 by YrAlarch |
Meanwhile a 13 year old girl is having to wait 3 years for the trial of the accused for her rape. Justice eh! |
Indeed, my colleague had a very similar situation in the same court as Giggs, her case got put back to next year, Giggs's went on.
Orders from above that his case with the publicity, could not be adjourned.
This is why we are striking, So many of us have left criminal law, it will get worse and worse and worse.
3 years, tragically, is not that long at the moment. (Obviously is, but very very common) Can you imagine if you are wrongly accused ? | | | |
| Giggs on 16:11 - Aug 31 with 1347 views | onehunglow |
| Giggs on 15:57 - Aug 31 by YrAlarch |
Meanwhile a 13 year old girl is having to wait 3 years for the trial of the accused for her rape. Justice eh! |
As are the family of young girls raped and murdered . | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Giggs on 16:22 - Aug 31 with 1328 views | Kilkennyjack |
| Giggs on 15:46 - Aug 31 by Sirjohnalot |
Be surprised if they did not. Will depend a lot on the view of the complainant. May be sensible to drop the control and coercive Count and continue just with the assaults |
They will go for it again, little doubt. |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Giggs on 16:24 - Aug 31 with 1326 views | onehunglow |
| Giggs on 16:22 - Aug 31 by Kilkennyjack |
They will go for it again, little doubt. |
and who pays the cost | |
| |
| Giggs on 16:43 - Aug 31 with 1306 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Giggs on 16:24 - Aug 31 by onehunglow |
and who pays the cost |
He will for his barrister.
State will for the prosecution. | | | |
| Giggs on 16:44 - Aug 31 with 1297 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Giggs on 16:22 - Aug 31 by Kilkennyjack |
They will go for it again, little doubt. |
If she is on board, very little doubt they will. On bail, likely to be around this time next year | | | |
| Giggs on 17:52 - Aug 31 with 1246 views | britferry |
Giggsy has booked a suite at a Manchester hotel tonight and a restaurant table for him & the female jury members [Post edited 31 Aug 2022 17:52]
| |
| |
| Giggs on 18:07 - Aug 31 with 1226 views | majorraglan |
If the complainant is happy to attend a retrial, I think they’ll definitely run another case as it’s too high profile not to. If she’s not happy, then they’ll drop it. | | | |
| Giggs on 18:12 - Aug 31 with 1213 views | lifelong |
This is no surprise, was expecting a not guilty verdict. |  | | |
| Giggs on 18:36 - Aug 31 with 1200 views | Sirjohnalot |
Complete pain trying to get past the press pack every day. | | | |
| Giggs on 13:49 - Sep 1 with 1063 views | shandyjack |
i missed the tweet from Gary Neville, is it likely to get him into trouble? |  |
| |
| Giggs on 13:51 - Sep 1 with 1062 views | onehunglow |
| Giggs on 13:49 - Sep 1 by shandyjack |
i missed the tweet from Gary Neville, is it likely to get him into trouble? |
Possible contempt of court.Possibly very very faint chance | |
| |
| Giggs on 13:59 - Sep 1 with 1043 views | Sirjohnalot |
Trial judge has referred it to the Attorney General.
She's an excellent Judge, does not take any messing around | | | |
| Giggs on 14:00 - Sep 1 with 1041 views | raynor94 |
Time to let it go, they were both as bad as one another. | |
| |
| Giggs on 14:03 - Sep 1 with 1038 views | onehunglow |
| Giggs on 14:00 - Sep 1 by raynor94 |
Time to let it go, they were both as bad as one another. |
You have a point.
He is clearly a orrible chap but he is one amongst millions albeit he is very rich.
Im not keen on another trial which Jonalot points out will be funded by the State,ie US. | |
| |
| Giggs on 14:51 - Sep 1 with 1018 views | felixstowe_jack |
Trouble is no one knows how many of the jury thought he was Guilty could be just two either way with 9 thinking he was guilty or 9 thinking he was Innocent.
Perhaps the prosecution should select a jury from Liverpool. | |
| |
| Giggs on 15:42 - Sep 1 with 991 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Giggs on 14:03 - Sep 1 by onehunglow |
You have a point.
He is clearly a orrible chap but he is one amongst millions albeit he is very rich.
Im not keen on another trial which Jonalot points out will be funded by the State,ie US. |
Forget about who they are.
If the complainant makes it clear that she wants the Crown to continue, then why wouldn't they ? This is a serious allegation in a domestic violence context. It would be very rare that they would not in that context | | | |
| Giggs on 17:37 - Sep 1 with 944 views | onehunglow |
| Giggs on 15:42 - Sep 1 by Sirjohnalot |
Forget about who they are.
If the complainant makes it clear that she wants the Crown to continue, then why wouldn't they ? This is a serious allegation in a domestic violence context. It would be very rare that they would not in that context |
Jury couldn’t decide
Seems his legal team have done a great job.
If there is another trial,he could well walk after almost two years of it hanging over his head.
It’s a mess
Is it in the public interest ? | |
| |
| Giggs on 17:55 - Sep 1 with 930 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Giggs on 17:37 - Sep 1 by onehunglow |
Jury couldn’t decide
Seems his legal team have done a great job.
If there is another trial,he could well walk after almost two years of it hanging over his head.
It’s a mess
Is it in the public interest ? |
I've cases 6 years plus old. It is a DV allegation, if true, very much in public interest. Won't drop it | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
