By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Martinez who saw him training everyday did not like what he saw and did not select him. He is no doubt a good player but we are talking about the World Cup. He was not considered good enough to lead the line.
We have just seen England go out resorting to panic hoofball for one third of the game. Martinez would have done a better job than Tuchel perhaps ? He failed at the same extreme peak as most managers do. There can only be one winner. .
All the also ran are "no good" or "frauds". They were very good just not the very best.
Left back and Spense were always a concern. This world cup has not been about intricate passing movement around the box. Have a pop from 25yards and stick the ball in the box for the big lad and a thumping header.
It's not your money. Tan will think " I did nothing wrong " . He found £15m and agreed a contract. The Agent was working for Nantes. The agent paid the pilot £270 cash ( reportedly). The Agent was involved in the disaster. He knowingly went for a bargain basement operator. Cash in hand no insurance an unqualified pilot and unsafe aircraft.
Nantes s agent arranged the fateful flight. I do not blame him to take this to the end. This was not justice for anyone.
If England win without controversy thy will deserve it. In many tournament they have had an easy route to the final. Not this one in the last 32 onwards tough tough games in tough conditions.
Congo, Mexico (at home ), Norway, Argentina and Spain. All strong teams no gimees.
It is going to happen eventually. They cannot lose on penalties v Germany anymore.
In true British style if you keep losing to Germany give the German the job.
Massive difference actually. Both are gambling but the returns are different Re In conventional gambling in horses or football if done without inside information or special software you can expect over a decade or so to LOSE.
With stocks and shares and other investments with advice and common sense and medium risk t you are guaranteed to WIN over a decade doubling your investment. 7% compound interest gives you this.
I staggers me that UK citizens do not understand RISK.
The Senedd has seemingly had good results from quite small contributions. By over-hyping their honourable achievements they gave suggested big donations.
" We have plan ed 25m trees in Uganda" .
Reform voters gave jumped on this as " waste' where in reality the support is about £5k a week. Leftist offer a soft ball to the b oh god by using woke labels like "gender neutral tree planting '.
Reform say nothing about the Kings £1m a week payrise . The profile of quite nasty ani charity po people are middle aged int ok puppies and poppies with motorbikes a key feature..
The thin blue line launched baton charge I read. Brave fellows. They s deserve support . Rioting is taken very seriously in UK as the Ely and Swansea rioter found out with 3-5 year sentences A few world cup African ars going to get licked up once the TV people go to work. They could if course legs it before then.
London had always been cosmopolitan since the 1960s . Africans Caribbeans Asians and Middle easterner. There is no going back to the 1950s.
Wales is of course different. Less jobs. We just have to fight to pe reserve out identity which many Unionists also reject and devalue.
"The Senedd had told Mr Thomas following his recent question: "The Commission is also aware that such sanitary provisions can also be of assistance to men dealing with certain health conditions, including certain types of cancer and/or incontinence" .
a) The council wants it confidential or do SCFC owners want I confidential.? The Owners approached the council not the other way around.
b) A low price would attract suspicion and possibly other interested parties
c) The deal is a little complex as the club is already paying rent and advertising fees to the council on a long term deal .
d) if the owners are " super rich" with big plans the council might be seei benefit in a low cost deal. Remember the Senedd gave Wrexham a grant to o help th m with the stand on the basis that they were spending big Wrexham.
e) If they do have big plans and spin offs down the line a competitive tender by a spoiler would not be welcome. A US hedge fund could buy the stadium pay more and put punitive rents on the current owners and SCFC for example.
If it is a Friday we Welshies will be all over this one. Take one for the Union Solidarity with the Saes brothers ( and sisters). The disallowed goal for Zico was a travesty.
I have mentioned it but not repeatedly. It was in the context of immigration. They take them in and unlike us are able to move them out by use of compulsory id cards which are checked.
We never needed such measures as an island and EU free movement . Then the " war on terror" started in 2002 and this created mass migration legal and illegal.
We all have different experiences and better for it.
The last two game i watched on TV were Wales u19 v Denmark and England national team v Mexico.
Superstars Harry and Real Madrid and Bellingham were putting in in the mixer an Bellingham scored two one a thumping header and the a crisp finish from a knock down. Haarland another exceptional talent another thumping header earlier in the day
Wales u19 had a philosophy that it was too risky to put the ball in the box. Bellamy ball is out of date and Wales have a huge number 9. Use what we have and find a style suited to Wales.