| We don't need to sell our best players 13:42 - Jun 21 with 2477 views | dmm |
So says Beale: QPR don’t need to sell star players - https://www.westlondonsport.com/qpr/beale-qpr-dont-need-to-sell-star-players
It's not only excellent news that we can retain Dieng, Dickie, Chair and Willock but also the statement suggests our finances are in better shape than most of us have thought.
It's two years since the Eze transfer fee and we've received almost no income in transfer fees since then. It really must mean we're only targetting frees and loans. |  | | |  |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 14:11 - Jun 21 with 2333 views | CliveWilsonSaid |
I was about to call a Spackman but it was you who posted this on the other thread. You can’t Spackman yourself I don’t think…
I don’t think anything has changed really in that all our players are for sale if their value is met. |  |
| |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 14:24 - Jun 21 with 2273 views | DannyPaddox |
A Self-Spackman is next level Spackman. Some call it Spackheimers. |  | | |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 14:39 - Jun 21 with 2218 views | SydneyRs |
Well it might inflate the price if we don't look desperate. |  | | |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 15:19 - Jun 21 with 2086 views | QPR_Jim |
So far we've let quite a few players leave on free transfers including potential high earners like Barbet and Austin. We've just got an undisclosed fee for de wijs and we've brought in two free transfers who are younger and hopefully on less money. So I'm optimistic that we've done enough to get back some headroom bit it may not leave us with a lot for building the rest of the squad. |  | | |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 15:37 - Jun 21 with 1990 views | stainrods_elbow |
No idea what to make of this 'headline', given the wearying mantra that Hoos, Les, Gerry Francis and a number of supporters have been trotting out/buying into for as long as I can remember. But then, further down the same interview, he talks about how, if a Prem club comes in for any of our starlets, the club will 'have to listen'. Go figure!
File under 'more meaningless footballese'! Beale out! |  |
| |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 15:41 - Jun 21 with 1990 views | GroveR |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 14:24 - Jun 21 by DannyPaddox |
A Self-Spackman is next level Spackman. Some call it Spackheimers. |
Then there's Spackdingers Cat where you can simultaneously both be a Spackman and not a Spackman due to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. |  | | |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 15:44 - Jun 21 with 1965 views | Rangersw12 |
It's not a bad thing if we have to sell our players with every player we have sold in the last 3 years the team has got better
Concerned that contracts will wittle down and we will be left in the lurch | | | |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 16:05 - Jun 21 with 1850 views | LythamR |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 15:37 - Jun 21 by stainrods_elbow |
No idea what to make of this 'headline', given the wearying mantra that Hoos, Les, Gerry Francis and a number of supporters have been trotting out/buying into for as long as I can remember. But then, further down the same interview, he talks about how, if a Prem club comes in for any of our starlets, the club will 'have to listen'. Go figure!
File under 'more meaningless footballese'! Beale out! |
Nature abhors a vacuum |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| We don't need to sell our best players on 16:22 - Jun 21 with 1770 views | stantheman10 |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 14:11 - Jun 21 by CliveWilsonSaid |
I was about to call a Spackman but it was you who posted this on the other thread. You can’t Spackman yourself I don’t think…
I don’t think anything has changed really in that all our players are for sale if their value is met. |
As all players are at most clubs in the Championship! | | | |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 16:35 - Jun 21 with 1739 views | DannyPaddox |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 15:41 - Jun 21 by GroveR |
Then there's Spackdingers Cat where you can simultaneously both be a Spackman and not a Spackman due to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. |
Which in theory can lead to a shifting Spackman perspective known as The Spackallax Effect
 | | | |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 21:30 - Jun 21 with 1349 views | Dorse |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 16:05 - Jun 21 by LythamR |
Nature abhors a vacuum |
So do my kids, based on the state of their rooms. |  |
| 'What do we want? We don't know! When do we want it? Now!' |
| |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 21:38 - Jun 21 with 1325 views | BazzaInTheLoft |
| We don't need to sell our best players on 15:37 - Jun 21 by stainrods_elbow |
No idea what to make of this 'headline', given the wearying mantra that Hoos, Les, Gerry Francis and a number of supporters have been trotting out/buying into for as long as I can remember. But then, further down the same interview, he talks about how, if a Prem club comes in for any of our starlets, the club will 'have to listen'. Go figure!
File under 'more meaningless footballese'! Beale out! |
If this upsets you, you (and us) are in for a long season. [Post edited 21 Jun 2022 22:11]
|  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
