| Road to Wembley thread 10:43 - Jan 3 with 90683 views | RangersDave | Yup, gone early on this one, however....... I'm not so sure Fleetwood will be a pushover, especially with our .... unfit, tired, ill, useless, out of contract soon, (delete as appropriate) players. With that in mind, i'm going 1-2 to the Rangers with Fleetwood scoring first and very early in the match. |  |
| |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 23:24 - Jan 6 with 4731 views | BrianMcCarthy |
That's not helping me at all! |  |
|  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 05:14 - Jan 7 with 4656 views | Match82 |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:34 - Jan 5 by hubble | It's a potential headline writer's tragedy that we've released Bonne. This would have been the perfect scenario to chuck him into the fray, get the winner, and live forever with the moniker 'Fleetwood Mac'. But sadly, it is not to be. Possibly 'Fleetwood cack' will be be used instead, on here, twitter, and across the QPuniveRse, should we pathetically capitulate in a Vauxhall Motors stylee... However, I'm predicting the Critch will take this seriously, and a solid 0-2 to the Rangers. |
Am underrated point. Meanwhile Clive is silently cursing the opportunities missed |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 07:19 - Jan 7 with 4568 views | dmm | It really does feel like everything about this game screams a QPR loss: third round of the FA cup, a new club, a new ground in the north, Fleetwood 25 places below us, their poor home record, wet and windy weather... Have I left anything out? If Critchley can fashion a victory out of this one he'll definitely boost his credit with supoorters. Best of luck to all who are going. |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 11:42 - Jan 7 with 4386 views | themodfather | as we have a poor pi55 poor fa cup record, one that is disgraceful, we are not winning, barely scoring , i think we will continue our pathetic cup form and lose at fleetwood 2-1 . they will then draw chelsea at home! |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 13:45 - Jan 7 with 4227 views | Damo1962 | That part of Lancashire is a Twilight Zone for us...so not expecting too much. |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:01 - Jan 7 with 4163 views | hubble | Why Paal on the bench I dont know. Laird too, although possibly still recovering. |  |
|  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:03 - Jan 7 with 4137 views | knocker | 2 goalkeepers on the bench? Jesus. |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:03 - Jan 7 with 4112 views | Rangersw12 | 2 keepers on the bench!? Our squad is massive so no need to start playing games about not enough players etc |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:05 - Jan 7 with 4071 views | colinallcars |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:03 - Jan 7 by knocker | 2 goalkeepers on the bench? Jesus. |
Well, Jesus saves, so maybe two goalies will as well. |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:07 - Jan 7 with 3999 views | dmm | Hamalainen is enough to cope with but selecting two sub keepers is bonkers. Why not have Amos there or take along one of the U21s instead? |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:08 - Jan 7 with 3993 views | Hastings_Hoops | No problem with resting Laird and Paal. Think Armstrong could have benefitted from a start though, or gone 442 with Dykes and Armstrong together and try illy and Willy on the wings. |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:08 - Jan 7 with 3989 views | knocker |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:05 - Jan 7 by colinallcars | Well, Jesus saves, so maybe two goalies will as well. |
Was waiting for that. Can't understand why Richards doesn't get a start. |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:09 - Jan 7 with 3971 views | davman |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:03 - Jan 7 by knocker | 2 goalkeepers on the bench? Jesus. |
Yes, that is shocking AND pointless †just give a kid a day out with the first team FFS. The truly worst thing about that line up is the left back. Sheesh. How is he worth a game? Truly shocking player. Still, apart from him, surely that team has enough about it to win today? |  |
|  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:10 - Jan 7 with 3957 views | CateLeBonR | Looks a decent team to me. Better than I was expecting really. No Luke Amos in the squad is a bit of a surprise though. |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:12 - Jan 7 with 3910 views | traininvain |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:07 - Jan 7 by dmm | Hamalainen is enough to cope with but selecting two sub keepers is bonkers. Why not have Amos there or take along one of the U21s instead? |
Presumably Amos is unavailable. Yet again. |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:12 - Jan 7 with 3901 views | DannyPaddox | Accentuating the positive. It’s mostly a strong line-up. Stronger than most Rs managers have played in the FA Cup in recent years. |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:14 - Jan 7 with 3844 views | francisbowles | Nine subs listed there, isn't it supposed to be seven? |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:17 - Jan 7 with 3789 views | eastside_r |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:03 - Jan 7 by knocker | 2 goalkeepers on the bench? Jesus. |
Disappointing. |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:20 - Jan 7 with 3725 views | Wegerles_Stairs | Loving the fact the artillery is ready to come off the bench when we're two-nil down. |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:23 - Jan 7 with 3701 views | aston_hoop | Strong side that should beat Fleetwood comfortably. I am going to have a small moan about 2 keepers on the bench though, why not use that spot for one of Dixon-Bonner, Aoraha, Hawkins, Gubbins, Drewe, Kolli, Pedder...someone with some potential who has impressed at the underage level? |  |
|  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:23 - Jan 7 with 3692 views | traininvain | The two keepers is a blatant message to the board for reinforcements this month. Can’t say I blame Critchley as the squad lacks depth but he must’ve know our financial situation before taking the job and being good mates with Beale, he must’ve known about our squad depth as well. And people were questioning during the week why we signed Tim on loan. It’s not ideal but Amos isn’t reliable enough to string together 2 or 3 appearances let alone a whole season. Not sure when his contract expires but if it’s this summer I’d be inclined to cut our losses. [Post edited 7 Jan 2023 14:24]
|  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:26 - Jan 7 with 3620 views | Andybrat |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:23 - Jan 7 by traininvain | The two keepers is a blatant message to the board for reinforcements this month. Can’t say I blame Critchley as the squad lacks depth but he must’ve know our financial situation before taking the job and being good mates with Beale, he must’ve known about our squad depth as well. And people were questioning during the week why we signed Tim on loan. It’s not ideal but Amos isn’t reliable enough to string together 2 or 3 appearances let alone a whole season. Not sure when his contract expires but if it’s this summer I’d be inclined to cut our losses. [Post edited 7 Jan 2023 14:24]
|
No loan players in starting line up, just an observation |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:27 - Jan 7 with 3608 views | terryb |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:14 - Jan 7 by francisbowles | Nine subs listed there, isn't it supposed to be seven? |
I think FB it is nine in The Premier & the FA wouldn't dare not carry out their wishes! |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:29 - Jan 7 with 3549 views | dmm |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:26 - Jan 7 by Andybrat | No loan players in starting line up, just an observation |
And an interesting observation too. BTW, Amos' contract expires this summer. |  | |  |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:31 - Jan 7 with 3520 views | Dorse |
| Road to Wembley thread on 14:23 - Jan 7 by aston_hoop | Strong side that should beat Fleetwood comfortably. I am going to have a small moan about 2 keepers on the bench though, why not use that spot for one of Dixon-Bonner, Aoraha, Hawkins, Gubbins, Drewe, Kolli, Pedder...someone with some potential who has impressed at the underage level? |
Absolutely. Two keepers is peak Redknappery. |  |
| 'What do we want? We don't know! When do we want it? Now!' |
|  |
| |