Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Release clauses in contracts 13:51 - Jan 10 with 4515 viewsD_Alien

We know that Dale are willing to accept them, in order to attract the type of talent that's kept us afloat not just in L1 but financially; and then to retain them on contracts such as Ollie Rathbone's 3 year deal

Of course i don't know for certain, but what's the point in getting angsty about whether we'll accept £X for whoever when it's probably a given that they'll leave (if they want to) once a certain amount is on offer?

[Post edited 10 Jan 2020 13:52]

Poll: What are you planning to do v Newport

0
Release clauses in contracts on 13:58 - Jan 10 with 3013 viewsfitzochris

Agreed.

The contention is what release clause is agreed at the point of a new contract being signed. It requires a strong negotiator on both sides.

Once that clause is agreed it is immaterial what we think a player is worth.
[Post edited 10 Jan 2020 13:58]

Blog: Rochdale 2018/19 part three: Getting points on the board

1
Release clauses in contracts on 14:04 - Jan 10 with 2999 viewsjonahwhereru

I don’t like agents, but with or without them there will always be negotiation on the make up of any contract. I was on the bargaining team for a union that’s negotiated with a big bank. It was all about horse trading and each side being able to satisfy their respective sides. That is the way it works in life, except may be divorce.
Supporters just have to search for the positives and suck up the negatives. The board can’t please all of the people all of the time in these matters .
For what it’s worth at the time I thought we got a great deal for Murray, but subsequent events have shown that I know fcuk all.
0
Release clauses in contracts on 14:16 - Jan 10 with 2949 viewsdingdangblue

Release clauses in contracts on 14:04 - Jan 10 by jonahwhereru

I don’t like agents, but with or without them there will always be negotiation on the make up of any contract. I was on the bargaining team for a union that’s negotiated with a big bank. It was all about horse trading and each side being able to satisfy their respective sides. That is the way it works in life, except may be divorce.
Supporters just have to search for the positives and suck up the negatives. The board can’t please all of the people all of the time in these matters .
For what it’s worth at the time I thought we got a great deal for Murray, but subsequent events have shown that I know fcuk all.


I always remember about 2-3 weeks after Murray left Brighton were already saying what a player he was and they'd got themselves a massive bargain. Although he won them promotion he ended up shafting them and leaving on a free to Palace. Although we didn't get any sell on I think they had to pay us some more money for getting promoted - even though he left.

Its a BRILLIANT goal to cap a BRILLIANT start by Rochdale - Don Goodman 26/08/10
Poll: Are fans more annoyed losing or not playing Henderson centre forward?

0
Release clauses in contracts on 14:27 - Jan 10 with 2931 viewsBigDaveMyCock

Release clauses in contracts on 14:16 - Jan 10 by dingdangblue

I always remember about 2-3 weeks after Murray left Brighton were already saying what a player he was and they'd got themselves a massive bargain. Although he won them promotion he ended up shafting them and leaving on a free to Palace. Although we didn't get any sell on I think they had to pay us some more money for getting promoted - even though he left.


He scored 54 goals for them in 118 games.
He served his contract with them brilliantly.
He then signed for them again on a free and has thus far scored 33 goals in 90 odd games (all in Prem). He is again serving his contract brilliantly and is arguably the reason for their survival in the Prem.
Brighton have done exceptionally well out of Glen Murray.

Can we be shafted like that please.
[Post edited 10 Jan 2020 14:28]

Poll: Was the Incredible Hulk a sh!thouse?

2
Release clauses in contracts on 14:32 - Jan 10 with 2895 viewstony_roch975

Release clauses in contracts on 13:58 - Jan 10 by fitzochris

Agreed.

The contention is what release clause is agreed at the point of a new contract being signed. It requires a strong negotiator on both sides.

Once that clause is agreed it is immaterial what we think a player is worth.
[Post edited 10 Jan 2020 13:58]


it might be the contention but we are on a hiding to nothing - we need to sign the player, they don't need to sign for us (at the bottom end of the wage scale in the EFL) and the only reason they might is cos we will offer them a low release fee clause.

Poll: What sort of Club do we want - if we can't have the status quo

0
Release clauses in contracts on 14:37 - Jan 10 with 2871 viewsdingdangblue

Release clauses in contracts on 14:27 - Jan 10 by BigDaveMyCock

He scored 54 goals for them in 118 games.
He served his contract with them brilliantly.
He then signed for them again on a free and has thus far scored 33 goals in 90 odd games (all in Prem). He is again serving his contract brilliantly and is arguably the reason for their survival in the Prem.
Brighton have done exceptionally well out of Glen Murray.

Can we be shafted like that please.
[Post edited 10 Jan 2020 14:28]


Obviously you have hindsight on your side - I'm sure if you asked Palace at the time he first left they wouldn't be too happy it was a free transfer.

Its a BRILLIANT goal to cap a BRILLIANT start by Rochdale - Don Goodman 26/08/10
Poll: Are fans more annoyed losing or not playing Henderson centre forward?

0
Release clauses in contracts on 14:41 - Jan 10 with 2855 viewsBigDaveMyCock

Release clauses in contracts on 14:37 - Jan 10 by dingdangblue

Obviously you have hindsight on your side - I'm sure if you asked Palace at the time he first left they wouldn't be too happy it was a free transfer.


He only left Palace once, I presume you mean Brighton?
I repeat, he scored 54 goals for them in 118 games. Exemplary service in my book.
A player is not obliged to sign another contract, just as a club is not obliged to offer one. Can’t have it both ways.
[Post edited 10 Jan 2020 14:45]

Poll: Was the Incredible Hulk a sh!thouse?

0
Release clauses in contracts on 14:49 - Jan 10 with 2829 viewsCleedale

Obviously we can't stand in anyone's footballing progression especially with the potential release clauses mentioned.

Just hope we won't be thinning (even more) what's been a very threadbare squad in respect to injuries etc. and that we're ready to invest to retain our league 1 status; surely the main priority?
0
Login to get fewer ads

Release clauses in contracts on 14:52 - Jan 10 with 2815 viewsdingdangblue

Release clauses in contracts on 14:41 - Jan 10 by BigDaveMyCock

He only left Palace once, I presume you mean Brighton?
I repeat, he scored 54 goals for them in 118 games. Exemplary service in my book.
A player is not obliged to sign another contract, just as a club is not obliged to offer one. Can’t have it both ways.
[Post edited 10 Jan 2020 14:45]


Yes Brighton sorry.

Its a BRILLIANT goal to cap a BRILLIANT start by Rochdale - Don Goodman 26/08/10
Poll: Are fans more annoyed losing or not playing Henderson centre forward?

0
Release clauses in contracts on 14:58 - Jan 10 with 2796 viewsfitzochris

Release clauses in contracts on 14:32 - Jan 10 by tony_roch975

it might be the contention but we are on a hiding to nothing - we need to sign the player, they don't need to sign for us (at the bottom end of the wage scale in the EFL) and the only reason they might is cos we will offer them a low release fee clause.


That’s not always the case. Players such as Holt, Dagnall, Lambert et al saw us as a positive step away from their current situation. We aren’t always the last stop before oblivion.

Blog: Rochdale 2018/19 part three: Getting points on the board

0
Release clauses in contracts on 15:39 - Jan 10 with 2695 viewstony_roch975

Release clauses in contracts on 14:58 - Jan 10 by fitzochris

That’s not always the case. Players such as Holt, Dagnall, Lambert et al saw us as a positive step away from their current situation. We aren’t always the last stop before oblivion.


that's more than a dozen years ago - we didn't have a history of release clauses & add-ons in player sales then, we've become far less competitive financially in the meantime and the likes of Holt and Lambert would now be getting scooped up in the big boys fish-net

Poll: What sort of Club do we want - if we can't have the status quo

0
Release clauses in contracts on 15:58 - Jan 10 with 2634 viewsBigDaveMyCock

Release clauses in contracts on 15:39 - Jan 10 by tony_roch975

that's more than a dozen years ago - we didn't have a history of release clauses & add-ons in player sales then, we've become far less competitive financially in the meantime and the likes of Holt and Lambert would now be getting scooped up in the big boys fish-net


Didn’t we make add-on money when Lambert went to Liverpool- which was a number of moves down the line.

Poll: Was the Incredible Hulk a sh!thouse?

0
Release clauses in contracts on 16:00 - Jan 10 with 2621 viewsfitzochris

Release clauses in contracts on 15:39 - Jan 10 by tony_roch975

that's more than a dozen years ago - we didn't have a history of release clauses & add-ons in player sales then, we've become far less competitive financially in the meantime and the likes of Holt and Lambert would now be getting scooped up in the big boys fish-net


Would they? Nobody knew who Holt was before he started scoring goals for us. Same goes for most others.

I think to paint a picture of us being some kind of last resort is a little unfair.

Yes, we are a small fish in the four professional divisions, but players don't sign for us with one arm bent up their back.

Blog: Rochdale 2018/19 part three: Getting points on the board

1
Release clauses in contracts on 16:03 - Jan 10 with 2611 viewsCleedale

Release clauses in contracts on 15:58 - Jan 10 by BigDaveMyCock

Didn’t we make add-on money when Lambert went to Liverpool- which was a number of moves down the line.


I think Lambert made more money? for The Dale than just about any other player re-add-ons etc.

Wonder whether we got extra for him playing for England...and scoring!
0
Release clauses in contracts on 16:18 - Jan 10 with 2563 viewsPlattyswrinklynuts

Release clauses in contracts on 13:58 - Jan 10 by fitzochris

Agreed.

The contention is what release clause is agreed at the point of a new contract being signed. It requires a strong negotiator on both sides.

Once that clause is agreed it is immaterial what we think a player is worth.
[Post edited 10 Jan 2020 13:58]


Am I missing something but in our case why have a release clause at all? The world & his mate all know that Dale always has & always will be a selling club. As long as the agent & the player know that the club won’t stand in the way of a player’s development then treat every potential transfer on its own merits.
0
Release clauses in contracts on 16:22 - Jan 10 with 2551 viewsdavidab2202

Release clauses in contracts on 16:03 - Jan 10 by Cleedale

I think Lambert made more money? for The Dale than just about any other player re-add-ons etc.

Wonder whether we got extra for him playing for England...and scoring!


if someone had the foresight to add that sort of clause in a transfer to Bristol Rovers,then whoever put it in there was wasting his time being at Spotland
0
Release clauses in contracts on 16:22 - Jan 10 with 2548 viewsD_Alien

Release clauses in contracts on 16:18 - Jan 10 by Plattyswrinklynuts

Am I missing something but in our case why have a release clause at all? The world & his mate all know that Dale always has & always will be a selling club. As long as the agent & the player know that the club won’t stand in the way of a player’s development then treat every potential transfer on its own merits.


Would you hand over the keys to a house you were selling because you "know" the buyer will pay up, because they did last time they bought a house?

Poll: What are you planning to do v Newport

0
Release clauses in contracts on 16:31 - Jan 10 with 2515 viewsfitzochris

Release clauses in contracts on 16:18 - Jan 10 by Plattyswrinklynuts

Am I missing something but in our case why have a release clause at all? The world & his mate all know that Dale always has & always will be a selling club. As long as the agent & the player know that the club won’t stand in the way of a player’s development then treat every potential transfer on its own merits.


In a business awash with cash and double-dealing, a gentlemen's agreement seems a little out of place.

Blog: Rochdale 2018/19 part three: Getting points on the board

0
Release clauses in contracts on 16:54 - Jan 10 with 2464 viewstony_roch975

Release clauses in contracts on 15:58 - Jan 10 by BigDaveMyCock

Didn’t we make add-on money when Lambert went to Liverpool- which was a number of moves down the line.


exactly - Lambert was I believe the first add-ons sale (well done Colin Garlick), we "didn't have a history" of doing it so players & their agents hadn't sussed out pushing us for a low release clause - now they have.

Poll: What sort of Club do we want - if we can't have the status quo

0
Release clauses in contracts on 16:54 - Jan 10 with 2464 viewsisitme

Without the reasonable release clauses the players would not sign. The pitch is play for Dale on a lower wage, put yourself in the shop window and earn your big move. Oh and your transfer fee wont be that high to disuade potential suiters. Rinse and then repeat.

As others have said, which of our recent sales have gone on to do that much?
1
Release clauses in contracts on 16:55 - Jan 10 with 2462 viewsCleedale

Release clauses in contracts on 16:22 - Jan 10 by davidab2202

if someone had the foresight to add that sort of clause in a transfer to Bristol Rovers,then whoever put it in there was wasting his time being at Spotland


Possibly.

But wasn't the Stephen Bywater sale to WHU dependent on several add-on clauses and that was a good few years before Lambert turned up from Stockport.

Not sure when Colin Garlick's employment started at Dale but always got the impression he knew his stuff; in his own way.
0
Release clauses in contracts on 17:08 - Jan 10 with 2424 views49thseason

Release clauses in contracts on 16:22 - Jan 10 by D_Alien

Would you hand over the keys to a house you were selling because you "know" the buyer will pay up, because they did last time they bought a house?


You would hope that a release clause might change over time to reflect wages and number of games played. So that the value of the clause increases as more games are played and / or wages are increased. This would ensure that the release value of a player reflected his value to the team (appearances) and what he has cost the club in wages. The club could easily develop a formula that could be put into new contracts which reflected the situation at the point of signing i.e. a young unproven talent and which would produce a larger sum at the point at which the player was sold assuming he was 2 or 3 years older and an established team asset.
Selling a player like Rathbone at a price which was put in his contract when he first signed after him playing say 75 or 100 first team games would be just daft. Its not hard to reduce a fee if everyone is agreeable, much harder to ask for more than the contract states when written 2 or 3 years ago.
0
Release clauses in contracts on 17:11 - Jan 10 with 2409 viewsD_Alien

Release clauses in contracts on 17:08 - Jan 10 by 49thseason

You would hope that a release clause might change over time to reflect wages and number of games played. So that the value of the clause increases as more games are played and / or wages are increased. This would ensure that the release value of a player reflected his value to the team (appearances) and what he has cost the club in wages. The club could easily develop a formula that could be put into new contracts which reflected the situation at the point of signing i.e. a young unproven talent and which would produce a larger sum at the point at which the player was sold assuming he was 2 or 3 years older and an established team asset.
Selling a player like Rathbone at a price which was put in his contract when he first signed after him playing say 75 or 100 first team games would be just daft. Its not hard to reduce a fee if everyone is agreeable, much harder to ask for more than the contract states when written 2 or 3 years ago.


Sounds sensible

Poll: What are you planning to do v Newport

0
Release clauses in contracts on 18:09 - Jan 10 with 2290 viewsdingdangblue

Release clauses in contracts on 17:08 - Jan 10 by 49thseason

You would hope that a release clause might change over time to reflect wages and number of games played. So that the value of the clause increases as more games are played and / or wages are increased. This would ensure that the release value of a player reflected his value to the team (appearances) and what he has cost the club in wages. The club could easily develop a formula that could be put into new contracts which reflected the situation at the point of signing i.e. a young unproven talent and which would produce a larger sum at the point at which the player was sold assuming he was 2 or 3 years older and an established team asset.
Selling a player like Rathbone at a price which was put in his contract when he first signed after him playing say 75 or 100 first team games would be just daft. Its not hard to reduce a fee if everyone is agreeable, much harder to ask for more than the contract states when written 2 or 3 years ago.


There are the odd exception but generally most players we have that aren't teenagers are only given 2 year contracts anyway. So after 1 season you are either trying to offer them a new deal or trying to sell him before they leave on a free transfer!

Its a BRILLIANT goal to cap a BRILLIANT start by Rochdale - Don Goodman 26/08/10
Poll: Are fans more annoyed losing or not playing Henderson centre forward?

0
Release clauses in contracts on 20:15 - Jan 10 with 2145 views49thseason

Release clauses in contracts on 18:09 - Jan 10 by dingdangblue

There are the odd exception but generally most players we have that aren't teenagers are only given 2 year contracts anyway. So after 1 season you are either trying to offer them a new deal or trying to sell him before they leave on a free transfer!


All true but the sell on clause still reflects value at the start of the contract when no one can be sure how well the player will perform, three transfer windows later a players value might still be much greater than initially thought. So the sliding scale can still apply . If the player has not lived up to expectations the contract would not have escalated his value and he could leave for free. If however a good offer does come in before the end of the contract, the sliding scale applies and the fee is appropriate to his performances for the club. Its entirely possible that a player signing a first contract could play 90 -100 games within a 2 year contract period, the club deserves a reward that is consistent with that opportunity. Additionally, there is now a basis for a negotiation on a transfer fee, down from the contracted amount, if required to get a deal done. But at least the starting point is an agreed reflection of current value, not an arbitrary figure set on day one of the contract which may be derisory 2 years down the road.

The problem of players leaving the club for nothing at the end of a contract is an altogether different discussion... Mendez-Laing being a notable example.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024