| OTH Ltd... on 14:12 - Jan 4 with 8874 views | BigPhilG |
I think the trust should be made aware of this. Wtf are these people playing at |  | |  |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:17 - Jan 4 with 8827 views | QJumpingJack |
what does it mean? |  | | |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:19 - Jan 4 with 8792 views | PatchesOHoulihan |
Can anyone explain to an uninformed idiot? |  |
| This is Patches O'Houlihan saying "Take care of your balls, and they'll take care of you." |
| |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:19 - Jan 4 with 8784 views | PapaLazarou |
To my unqualified eye, it looks like MM doing some crafty maneuvering ready for the near future... |  | | |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:20 - Jan 4 with 8782 views | cimlajack |
Nice work digging that out  | | | |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:20 - Jan 4 with 8772 views | herbie |
It appears to be a dormant company and is now in liquidation. Strange as to why there was a need to change directors first though. | | | |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:20 - Jan 4 with 8769 views | waynekerr55 |
Does this mean Kaplan and Levein owed the Morgan's money, therefore giving shares as payment for debt? |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| OTH Ltd... on 14:23 - Jan 4 with 8709 views | swanseajack4eva |
Looks like clean-up of dormant accounts/companies, perhaps to facilitate upcoming transactions where monies are owed. |  | | |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:24 - Jan 4 with 8700 views | herbie |
Don't see shares in an apparently dormant company has being valuable, but I also don't understand the change in directorship or why it would be liquidated. Very odd situation. | | | |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:26 - Jan 4 with 8675 views | herbie |
And the shares don't seem to have changed hands, only the directorships. | | | |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:28 - Jan 4 with 8648 views | waynekerr55 |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:20 - Jan 4 by cimlajack |
Nice work digging that out |
Mr Touch Far Vetched work - I'm just the water carrier | |
| |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:29 - Jan 4 with 8613 views | DwightYorkeSuperstar |
Could that be the business Morgan kept his Swansea shares in and the appointment of the Americans as directors was to give them the voting rights of those shares? |  |
| |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:35 - Jan 4 with 8544 views | MoscowJack |
It's a pretty standard way of selling shares. | |
| |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:46 - Jan 4 with 8435 views | waynekerr55 |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:35 - Jan 4 by MoscowJack |
It's a pretty standard way of selling shares. |
Rather telling that the company was set up in September 2015, don't you think? | |
| |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:48 - Jan 4 with 8415 views | londonlisa2001 |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:35 - Jan 4 by MoscowJack |
It's a pretty standard way of selling shares. |
What is?
Assigning voting rights over shares you haven't sold to ensure that the minority shareholder can be outvoted on absolutely everything so that you can maximise your sales proceeds at their expense you mean? | | | |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:50 - Jan 4 with 8397 views | londonlisa2001 |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:46 - Jan 4 by waynekerr55 |
Rather telling that the company was set up in September 2015, don't you think? |
Must be a complete coincidence. The Morgans never knew anything about it. | | | |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:51 - Jan 4 with 8388 views | londonlisa2001 |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:29 - Jan 4 by DwightYorkeSuperstar |
Could that be the business Morgan kept his Swansea shares in and the appointment of the Americans as directors was to give them the voting rights of those shares? |
When you drop the nonsense Dwight, you can be quite perceptive. | | | |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:59 - Jan 4 with 8327 views | MoscowJack |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:50 - Jan 4 by londonlisa2001 |
Must be a complete coincidence. The Morgans never knew anything about it. |
My guess would be it was set up before or during the talks with Moores & Co. Timelines seem to be about right.
We all knew they were actively looking for a buyer back then (which was fine by us all, as long as we sold to someone with more money than the old owners and included the Trust in the sale). Also, we (or at least I) didn't think the Jack to a King film was as much as a marketing tool as it obviously was. | |
| |
| OTH Ltd... on 15:02 - Jan 4 with 8297 views | NeathJack |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:59 - Jan 4 by MoscowJack |
My guess would be it was set up before or during the talks with Moores & Co. Timelines seem to be about right.
We all knew they were actively looking for a buyer back then (which was fine by us all, as long as we sold to someone with more money than the old owners and included the Trust in the sale). Also, we (or at least I) didn't think the Jack to a King film was as much as a marketing tool as it obviously was. |
It was set up a full year after Yanks 1.0 http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/swansea-city-investmen and at around the same time that the initial talks would have began with Yanks 2.0. [Post edited 4 Jan 2018 15:06]
|  | | |
| OTH Ltd... on 15:06 - Jan 4 with 8263 views | londonlisa2001 |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:59 - Jan 4 by MoscowJack |
My guess would be it was set up before or during the talks with Moores & Co. Timelines seem to be about right.
We all knew they were actively looking for a buyer back then (which was fine by us all, as long as we sold to someone with more money than the old owners and included the Trust in the sale). Also, we (or at least I) didn't think the Jack to a King film was as much as a marketing tool as it obviously was. |
Come off it Nick.
It was set up 3 months before a draft detailed SPA was in circulation with this lot (as helpfully posted on the internet by Jim White during his recent conversation with various sellers). | | | |
| OTH Ltd... on 15:08 - Jan 4 with 8238 views | DwightYorkeSuperstar |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:59 - Jan 4 by MoscowJack |
My guess would be it was set up before or during the talks with Moores & Co. Timelines seem to be about right.
We all knew they were actively looking for a buyer back then (which was fine by us all, as long as we sold to someone with more money than the old owners and included the Trust in the sale). Also, we (or at least I) didn't think the Jack to a King film was as much as a marketing tool as it obviously was. |
Some of us were adamant it was a commercial when it was in development and subsequently released.
Seeing that it was being played numerous times on channels in America should have been enough to alert even those with their heads firmly in the sand that something was up.
I wonder how much of the budget went on paying to have it played on American television and in carefully preselected cinemas in America? I wonder if Charles Noel or however you spell his name and the rest of the potential buyers they had earmarked lived in the vicinity of where this film which had no chance of commercial success was pushed ? | |
| |
| OTH Ltd... on 15:08 - Jan 4 with 8240 views | Darran |
| OTH Ltd... on 14:59 - Jan 4 by MoscowJack |
My guess would be it was set up before or during the talks with Moores & Co. Timelines seem to be about right.
We all knew they were actively looking for a buyer back then (which was fine by us all, as long as we sold to someone with more money than the old owners and included the Trust in the sale). Also, we (or at least I) didn't think the Jack to a King film was as much as a marketing tool as it obviously was. |
My guess is you're still big butts with Martin. lol |  |
| |
| OTH Ltd... on 15:09 - Jan 4 with 8223 views | waynekerr55 |
| OTH Ltd... on 15:08 - Jan 4 by DwightYorkeSuperstar |
Some of us were adamant it was a commercial when it was in development and subsequently released.
Seeing that it was being played numerous times on channels in America should have been enough to alert even those with their heads firmly in the sand that something was up.
I wonder how much of the budget went on paying to have it played on American television and in carefully preselected cinemas in America? I wonder if Charles Noel or however you spell his name and the rest of the potential buyers they had earmarked lived in the vicinity of where this film which had no chance of commercial success was pushed ? |
This just gets better.
By fans, for fans. | |
| |
| OTH Ltd... on 15:14 - Jan 4 with 8181 views | londonlisa2001 |
On this particular topic btw, we already knew about this as the club (2002 Ltd level) passed a special resolution to allow it to happen at the same time from memory. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
