Murad Ahmed - Financial Times 22:45 - May 10 with 2436 views | 34dfgdf54 | A journalist from the Financial Times was given behind the scenes access all season to see how we are run. Apparently we are not prepared whatsoever for relegation. Our owners are from America where relegation does not exist, and they wasn’t expecting it. Lovely | | | | |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 22:52 - May 10 with 2386 views | jack2jack | Saw this earlier on the news. What sh!t have they been fed, I mean seriously. | | | |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 22:54 - May 10 with 2354 views | jacksfullaces | but already looking to appoint a new manager - what, hoping they sort it all out??? #desperation | | | |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 22:54 - May 10 with 2354 views | peenemunde | Of course they know what relegation is what a load of rubbish. | | | |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 22:55 - May 10 with 2352 views | westside | Oprah's going to be tamping | | | |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 22:55 - May 10 with 2332 views | GeoffThom | This just gets duller by the day .It's like the feckin venkys thinking they bought a franchise | | | |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 22:58 - May 10 with 2288 views | NeathJack | Given the fact it nearly happened last year and the implication would have been laid bare then (I recall an interview with Pearlman regarding it), even with this lot it seems highly implausible. | | | |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 23:04 - May 10 with 2233 views | Brynmill_Jack |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 22:54 - May 10 by peenemunde | Of course they know what relegation is what a load of rubbish. |
Hi Huw | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 23:08 - May 10 with 2197 views | Phil_S |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 22:58 - May 10 by NeathJack | Given the fact it nearly happened last year and the implication would have been laid bare then (I recall an interview with Pearlman regarding it), even with this lot it seems highly implausible. |
I couldn't say for this season but for a fact last season there was two cashflow models prepared - one for PL status in 17/18 and one for Championship status It would seem improbable that this bit wouldn't have done given the vast detail that Gareth Davies used to put into pretty much most of what he did. Although in fairness I had heard on the old grapevine that much of what he prepared was given little interest by those who should care | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 23:08 - May 10 with 2197 views | Joe_bradshaw |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 22:58 - May 10 by NeathJack | Given the fact it nearly happened last year and the implication would have been laid bare then (I recall an interview with Pearlman regarding it), even with this lot it seems highly implausible. |
Indeed. They may not have fully grasped the concept on the day they bought the club but they’ve been here long enough to know what it’s all about now. | |
| |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 23:11 - May 10 with 2160 views | NeathJack |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 23:08 - May 10 by Phil_S | I couldn't say for this season but for a fact last season there was two cashflow models prepared - one for PL status in 17/18 and one for Championship status It would seem improbable that this bit wouldn't have done given the vast detail that Gareth Davies used to put into pretty much most of what he did. Although in fairness I had heard on the old grapevine that much of what he prepared was given little interest by those who should care |
The article he has written doesn't really give the impression that he appears to be making out in his tv interview (which I haven't seen btw). https://www.ft.com/content/d28b725e-3796-11e8-8eee-e06bde01c544 | | | |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 23:11 - May 10 with 2159 views | 34dfgdf54 |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 23:08 - May 10 by Phil_S | I couldn't say for this season but for a fact last season there was two cashflow models prepared - one for PL status in 17/18 and one for Championship status It would seem improbable that this bit wouldn't have done given the vast detail that Gareth Davies used to put into pretty much most of what he did. Although in fairness I had heard on the old grapevine that much of what he prepared was given little interest by those who should care |
Whose Gareth Davies? Excuse my ignorance. | | | |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 23:13 - May 10 with 2138 views | Phil_S |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 23:11 - May 10 by 34dfgdf54 | Whose Gareth Davies? Excuse my ignorance. |
I dont know his title but he is the man that prepares all the cashflows etc The main accountant - scent guy knows his onions (so to speak!) but can clearly only work with the figures he is given | | | |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 23:33 - May 10 with 2039 views | 34dfgdf54 |
Murad Ahmed - Financial Times on 23:13 - May 10 by Phil_S | I dont know his title but he is the man that prepares all the cashflows etc The main accountant - scent guy knows his onions (so to speak!) but can clearly only work with the figures he is given |
You’re last paragraph of your previous post saying those who matter didn’t take much interest is a big worry though. | | | |
| |