| Positive v Negative 12:06 - Jan 29 with 1918 views | onehunglow |
I see this has reared itsugly head again.
Just exactly what is "negative".
What exactly is positive.
You can fill yer boots boys .
Off ya go. Come on |  |
| |  |
| Positive v Negative on 19:36 - Jan 29 with 487 views | NotLoyal |
Watch those subs on Saturday, every faith in cooper.
Morris could be a revelation. |  |
| |
| Positive v Negative on 19:59 - Jan 29 with 470 views | Fireboy2 |
| Positive v Negative on 19:36 - Jan 29 by NotLoyal |
Watch those subs on Saturday, every faith in cooper.
Morris could be a revelation. |
Like your positivity NJ👠|  | | |
| Positive v Negative on 20:18 - Jan 29 with 454 views | AndyCole |
| Positive v Negative on 14:48 - Jan 29 by onehunglow |
Nobody yet has defined as to what exactly is positive it negative |
You're right. It's all in the genes apparently. Yet for me it's about intelligent choice.
Yin and Yang makes perfect sense. And it's all about balance. Forums would be dead without the opposing views, and should be encouraged not frowned upon.
Typically, cleverer types err on the positive. Rational thinkers. It's how stuff gets done.
Football players err on the positive, it's how they win.
Overtly negative types are often unable to see how negative they actually are, so makes sense to list what negative looks like (on here) :
- irrationally critical of management and players, especially when we're 2nd in the league
- pounce on the first whiff of weakness in team performance - the brunt of which dumped on Cooper and Grimes - the Brentford aftermath was abhorrent yet entirely predictable of some
- always moaning - the owners, the manager, the players, especially Grimes
- willing the team to lose, to gain some cheap shots on a fans forum. Let's see what happens should we unexpectedly lose tmw
- only turn up when we're losing, and gloat
- glass empty, not even half way full
There are hundreds of these types littered around the Liberty. Miserable, tired types that ought to do something else on matchdays. We started to call them out, ask them politely to sit down, stop hurling abuse at our young team and get a grip.
- | |
| Pro free speech and alternative opinions -
Anti gang-bullying and poor modding thereof -
Will always make a stand against those who consistently choose to turn a blind eye |
| |
| Positive v Negative on 20:28 - Jan 29 with 448 views | Dr_Winston |
There are those who take great joy in the team struggling, no matter how hard they try to deny it when challenged. They're easily identifiable by how active they are after a poor performance. Maybe they'll even start threads complaining about how hard done by they are by people criticising them when they do.
There are those who are generally quite happy with how the team does, but see no point in pretending that poor performances can be glibly dismissed without properly analysing them for worrying traits. Most of those who had issues with Garry Monk in the 14/15 season fall into this category.
There are those who will defend the team and management no matter what. Admirable to a degree, but not to be taken too seriously as in the long term they tend to end up with egg on their collective faces.
As with most things, the middle ground tends to be the smartest path to follow. [Post edited 29 Jan 2021 20:42]
|  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| Positive v Negative on 20:56 - Jan 29 with 419 views | onehunglow |
Irrational.Now that is another matter | |
| |
| Positive v Negative on 23:33 - Jan 29 with 374 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Positive v Negative on 19:10 - Jan 29 by ItchySphincter |
I’m out as in I’m not being dragged in to your silly circular arguments.
Now if you don’t mind, there’s others on here too, it’s not all about you.
Please don’t reply like a moth to a flame, champ.
 |
Beep beep. Poster reversing.
If you didn’t want me to reply to you, then why on earth you decided yet again to seek out my post for your nonsense I will never know. Anyone would think I’m right under your skin...
Think before you post, champ. |  |
| |
| Positive v Negative on 23:41 - Jan 29 with 373 views | AndyCole |
| Positive v Negative on 20:28 - Jan 29 by Dr_Winston |
There are those who take great joy in the team struggling, no matter how hard they try to deny it when challenged. They're easily identifiable by how active they are after a poor performance. Maybe they'll even start threads complaining about how hard done by they are by people criticising them when they do.
There are those who are generally quite happy with how the team does, but see no point in pretending that poor performances can be glibly dismissed without properly analysing them for worrying traits. Most of those who had issues with Garry Monk in the 14/15 season fall into this category.
There are those who will defend the team and management no matter what. Admirable to a degree, but not to be taken too seriously as in the long term they tend to end up with egg on their collective faces.
As with most things, the middle ground tends to be the smartest path to follow. [Post edited 29 Jan 2021 20:42]
|
The middling types are the ones to watch aren't they.
They sit on the fence, trying to look all clever, all seeing, aloof. Whereas in reality these are the 'greys' in the crowd who jump at every opportunity to criticise. They're only ever 'quite happy'. But suddenly can become irrationally vindictive, violently tapping their keyboards with pent up aggression, chomping at the bit to mention the Monk word, their ace card. Eager to over analyse our weaknesses, but totally absent in analysing our strengths and accomplishments.
The volume of Negative posts and deep Negative analytics from our heroic draw against Brentford, where the usual suspect Negative types were joined by the deeply disturbing middling crew is telling.
In this case it seems the middling ground is the flakiest place to be. | |
| Pro free speech and alternative opinions -
Anti gang-bullying and poor modding thereof -
Will always make a stand against those who consistently choose to turn a blind eye |
| |
| Positive v Negative on 10:55 - Jan 30 with 308 views | onehunglow |
| Positive v Negative on 23:41 - Jan 29 by AndyCole |
The middling types are the ones to watch aren't they.
They sit on the fence, trying to look all clever, all seeing, aloof. Whereas in reality these are the 'greys' in the crowd who jump at every opportunity to criticise. They're only ever 'quite happy'. But suddenly can become irrationally vindictive, violently tapping their keyboards with pent up aggression, chomping at the bit to mention the Monk word, their ace card. Eager to over analyse our weaknesses, but totally absent in analysing our strengths and accomplishments.
The volume of Negative posts and deep Negative analytics from our heroic draw against Brentford, where the usual suspect Negative types were joined by the deeply disturbing middling crew is telling.
In this case it seems the middling ground is the flakiest place to be. |
Jeez,missed out middling.
This shows positive or negative is as the indivual sees it.
People posting negative are not evil neither are positive angels . | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.