| Players leaving on loan 14:40 - Aug 19 with 2195 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Garrick has gone to Plymouth.
Rumours that Whittaker is about to follow him out on loan somewhere.
|  |
| |  |
| Players leaving on loan on 16:30 - Aug 19 with 644 views | max936 |
Whitaker hasn't had a chance in fairness, I'm disappointed to see him going out on loan, question's must be asked as to why we dished out 700k+ if we weren't gonna play him, unless he's disruptive and has attitude issues, I think its a waste. |  | | |
| Players leaving on loan on 16:51 - Aug 19 with 598 views | onehunglow |
| Players leaving on loan on 16:19 - Aug 19 by DwightYorkeSuperstar |
Cullen has the potential to play in League 2, and that is me being very generous.
He plays as a "poacher" who doesn't finish many of his chances and offers absolutely nothing anywhere else on the pitch.
Why he is still here bemuses me. Why he actually plays in our team should insult the likes of Whittaker. |
He cannot head a ball,no strong shot,not quick nor aggressive and can't dribble past players. He has no strength and will always be bullied out of any ability he has.
Madness he stays with us
Yet... |  |
| |
| Players leaving on loan on 17:03 - Aug 19 with 567 views | jackrmee |
| Players leaving on loan on 16:25 - Aug 19 by Dr_Parnassus |
You just said send them on loan?
You seem to think you are skilled enough to think it’s possible to train any professional to be superior at any skillset.
I can’t keep up with you, your opinions are jumping all over the place. Have you trained anyone before out of interest? |
I havent said ANY professional.
I'm simply saying that my opinion is, most of our players are good enough to adapt to RMs system. Some will need to be bought, some sold. Some will need to go out on loan, some loans need to come in.
You are the one saying we don't have the players.
Then you twist everything around and make it out like other people are being confusing, when it's you the one who confuses everything purposely in order to "win" a debate, which is not meant to be won.
This is a forum for debate. not a forum to win as many arguments as possible, by any means possible.
You are by far the most annoying commentator on this site. |  |
| |
| Players leaving on loan on 17:10 - Aug 19 with 555 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Players leaving on loan on 17:03 - Aug 19 by jackrmee |
I havent said ANY professional.
I'm simply saying that my opinion is, most of our players are good enough to adapt to RMs system. Some will need to be bought, some sold. Some will need to go out on loan, some loans need to come in.
You are the one saying we don't have the players.
Then you twist everything around and make it out like other people are being confusing, when it's you the one who confuses everything purposely in order to "win" a debate, which is not meant to be won.
This is a forum for debate. not a forum to win as many arguments as possible, by any means possible.
You are by far the most annoying commentator on this site. |
Right so we are getting somewhere, we now agree that being a professional footballer doesn’t mean you can be trained to play a certain way.
What have I twisted? What am I being confusing about? My stance is the same now as it was 18 months ago when I was saying it, it’s absolutely crystal clear and not a single thing been twisted.
We do not have the squad to play this way, we aren’t technically gifted in many departments which is why we’re are getting hammered and giving the ball away in key areas multiple times every single game.
I think we should play a bit more sensibly until we get the required players in so it’s not so much of a hole to dig out of when we get them in.
How is that anyway confusing? | |
| |
| Players leaving on loan on 17:17 - Aug 19 with 534 views | jackrmee |
| Players leaving on loan on 17:10 - Aug 19 by Dr_Parnassus |
Right so we are getting somewhere, we now agree that being a professional footballer doesn’t mean you can be trained to play a certain way.
What have I twisted? What am I being confusing about? My stance is the same now as it was 18 months ago when I was saying it, it’s absolutely crystal clear and not a single thing been twisted.
We do not have the squad to play this way, we aren’t technically gifted in many departments which is why we’re are getting hammered and giving the ball away in key areas multiple times every single game.
I think we should play a bit more sensibly until we get the required players in so it’s not so much of a hole to dig out of when we get them in.
How is that anyway confusing? |
Yes, but you believe that our squad is not only incapable of playing RM's way, but they are incapable of learning how to do so as well...
So which of our players are incapable of learning how to play this way?
And of the players who are unable to adapt to our managers way of playing, how many should be sold?
Of the ones you decide should not be sold, what is the reason for keeping them?
thats all I want to know. Thanks. | |
| |
| Players leaving on loan on 17:21 - Aug 19 with 526 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Players leaving on loan on 17:17 - Aug 19 by jackrmee |
Yes, but you believe that our squad is not only incapable of playing RM's way, but they are incapable of learning how to do so as well...
So which of our players are incapable of learning how to play this way?
And of the players who are unable to adapt to our managers way of playing, how many should be sold?
Of the ones you decide should not be sold, what is the reason for keeping them?
thats all I want to know. Thanks. |
I’m sure everyone can learn how to do it, but putting it into practice with actual ability at this level is quite another.
You have been given a list 3 times of players who are not technically gifted enough to play this style. Asking me over and over again isn’t going to strengthen your point.
You have also asked me what we should do with them 3 times and have received an answer each time.
You are clogging up the board with your nonsense. Stop. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.