| Suella sacked then 08:53 - Nov 13 with 3431 views | onehunglow |
Least surprising news ever |  |
| |  |
| Suella sacked then on 19:06 - Nov 17 with 647 views | waynekerr55 |
| Suella sacked then on 00:15 - Nov 17 by Robbie |
Braverman and Patel talked the talk but both were over ruled by High Court verdicts regarding their efforts to find any solutions to many current issues , they were sacked .
Who runs the UK now , Westminster or Law Lords , cannot remember putting my X vote in the booth letting Judges rule the roost . |
Judges pass down rulings based on laws passed by parliament.
The myth of Brexit is that a nation can be totally sovereign and free of international treaties (cake and eating), that's simply not the case |  |
| |
| Suella sacked then on 19:08 - Nov 17 with 640 views | waynekerr55 |
| Suella sacked then on 08:32 - Nov 17 by onehunglow |
There’s are many things I should do.
I M not going to cast a vote for a party or candidate for whom I feel distain.
We are where we are because too many are class obsessed and vote only one way as their “ culture” instructs . |
And of course that's your right, my chum.
We need to get back power and that comes from a politically engaged populace, in my opinion anyway | |
| |
| Suella sacked then on 19:12 - Nov 17 with 633 views | onehunglow |
| Suella sacked then on 19:08 - Nov 17 by waynekerr55 |
And of course that's your right, my chum.
We need to get back power and that comes from a politically engaged populace, in my opinion anyway |
Daughters been down darecin linden today and just getting back now.
Congress House
Not a Union girl but she had a business interest there
I told her not to mention the miners and think she got away with it . [Post edited 17 Nov 2023 19:15]
| |
| |
| Suella sacked then on 19:17 - Nov 17 with 625 views | SullutaCreturned |
| Suella sacked then on 19:06 - Nov 17 by waynekerr55 |
Judges pass down rulings based on laws passed by parliament.
The myth of Brexit is that a nation can be totally sovereign and free of international treaties (cake and eating), that's simply not the case |
Ah, but those international treaties are agreed on, negotiated and signed by a soveriegn nations government. | | | |
| Suella sacked then on 19:19 - Nov 17 with 622 views | waynekerr55 |
| Suella sacked then on 19:17 - Nov 17 by SullutaCreturned |
Ah, but those international treaties are agreed on, negotiated and signed by a soveriegn nations government. |
Correct. But by the way you hear the crap from quacks from "tHe BrUgEs GrOuP" and quacks like Hannan, Heath et al. in the Telegraph it's easy to see why people are fooled by these parasites | |
| |
| Suella sacked then on 19:47 - Nov 17 with 610 views | majorraglan |
| Suella sacked then on 17:45 - Nov 17 by SullutaCreturned |
I think that's the point.we should pay them enough and the rules should be no second jobs, no paid interests outside politics, no advisory roles.
Pay the Prime Minister 750k per year and that's it, no expenses.
But then the rules also need to be stronger and clearer around things like lying, misleading the country, about pusnihmsnts if you break the rules.
Maybe that is the way forward but how can we expect the people who ARE the problem to change things for the better? |
…… and here comes Brandon Lewis latest external interest. He’s got another job working 8 hours. A weeks for which he’ll earn £250k - the company he’s working for was owned by 2 Russians who’ve been sanctioned.
https://www.theguardian.com/po | | | |
| Suella sacked then on 21:42 - Nov 17 with 577 views | majorraglan |
| Suella sacked then on 09:16 - Nov 17 by majorraglan |
The judges were right with their decision making, what was being proposed was illegal. Let’s be honest, this shower are probably the most untrustworthy collective of politicians we’ve ever had in charge and the law of the land is there to protect and safeguard.
The law of the land is there for a reason and applies to everyone including politicians, nobody should be above the law. If the politicians can ignore or break laws as and when they choose, where will it end ? Probably when we’re like Russia or Zimbabwe with kangaroo Courts and people being jailed just for speaking out.
People like Braverman and Patel have been bumping their gums off for ages pushing a policy that anyone with half a brain could see would crash and burn at Court, but they’ve persisted and wasted and huge amounts of cash on a policy that wouldn’t get off the ground. We should be holding them to account and not the judges who’ve pulled them up on their policy. |
Seems Damien Green agrees about the government having to obey the law like everyone else.
Green told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “This is the most unconservative proposal I’ve ever heard. You know conservatives believe in a democratic country, run by the rule of law. Dictators like Xi [Jinping] and [Vladimir] Putin would prefer to have the state completely untrammelled by any law.”
He added: “Defending the principle that governments have to obey the law is really important for conservatives, perhaps particularly at times of heightened political change.”
https://www.theguardian.com/po
Braverman is off her trolley, let’s get some sensible people around a table and see what can be done. One of problems with politicians is that they have huge ego’s and don’t like being pulled up for being wrong even when it’s obvious to one and all.
Let’s get some sensible people around the table and sort it out, to be fair to Sunak he’s made huge inroads in to resolving the NI impasse where Johnson and Frost wanted confrontation. [Post edited 17 Nov 2023 21:44]
| | | |
| Suella sacked then on 05:59 - Nov 18 with 552 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
| Suella sacked then on 12:22 - Nov 17 by Gwyn737 |
They should be stopped from doing those things and be paid much much more.
The PMs salary is less than that of an average league 2 footballer. No suprise income is gerenated in other ways.
If we want the brightest and best we need to pay for them. |
Will increasing the pay really increase the bright and best when we have closed selection lists, all women quotas and the rampant nepotism and cronyism that we have seen for years? The reality is increasing the pay will just mean the sub standard idiots will just earn a lot more for being useless. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Suella sacked then on 06:42 - Nov 18 with 543 views | SullutaCreturned |
| Suella sacked then on 05:59 - Nov 18 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
Will increasing the pay really increase the bright and best when we have closed selection lists, all women quotas and the rampant nepotism and cronyism that we have seen for years? The reality is increasing the pay will just mean the sub standard idiots will just earn a lot more for being useless. |
Well that's the reason we need change, maybe with more reward the brighter people will come forward and we won't be stuck with utter cockwombles like Drakeford, Bojo....Matt Hancock.....Gething....I could be here all day so I'll stop.....
What Welsh Labour are doing is an affront to democracy, it's at least as bad as anything they ever accused to tories of, they are changing the rules to try and guarantee their own success at the polling booth. It's wrong. | | | |
| Suella sacked then on 07:28 - Nov 18 with 529 views | Gwyn737 |
| Suella sacked then on 05:59 - Nov 18 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
Will increasing the pay really increase the bright and best when we have closed selection lists, all women quotas and the rampant nepotism and cronyism that we have seen for years? The reality is increasing the pay will just mean the sub standard idiots will just earn a lot more for being useless. |
I think it might.
More trying to get in would put additional pressure to widen the pool. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.