| USA UK Relations 22:33 - Oct 4 with 1568 views | Luther27 |
After the USA withdraws its bombers from Fairford base on the grounds of security. Why would they do that do you think? Perhaps releasing antagonists and Pro Palestine sympathisers on bail may have something to do with it along with the direction this country is heading.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  | | |  |
| USA UK Relations on 22:43 - Oct 4 with 1081 views | onehunglow |
Bailing them terrified Trump
Did me anywY
There again slitting a dinghy is more dangerous thus warranted did month remand | |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 22:45 - Oct 4 with 1092 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
I was shocked at the previous event At RAF Brize Norton. The UK answer to crimes is not prevention but tough sentencing and action after the event. This is wholly inadequate when dealing with ÂŁ50m Jets and fuels store in a time of million to set action against Russia. It smacked of complacency. No news of severe warnings to the camp chiefs to tighten thing up and assurances of action.
I have no idea what was going on a Fairford. It has the feel of a false flag scam gone wrong. [Post edited 4 Oct 22:49]
|  |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 23:43 - Oct 4 with 1032 views | Fireboy2 |
Why is this on the football section? |  | | |
| USA UK Relations on 10:00 - Oct 5 with 828 views | Luther27 |
| USA UK Relations on 23:43 - Oct 4 by Fireboy2 |
Why is this on the football section? |
Fat fingers sorry mate | | | |
| USA UK Relations on 11:10 - Oct 5 with 768 views | Fireboy2 |
| USA UK Relations on 10:00 - Oct 5 by Luther27 |
Fat fingers sorry mate |
đź‘Ź | | | |
| USA UK Relations on 11:32 - Oct 5 with 743 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| USA UK Relations on 10:00 - Oct 5 by Luther27 |
Fat fingers sorry mate |
If you select edit on your OP you can then select the correct board and repost there. |  |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 12:35 - Oct 5 with 660 views | trampie |
The worry is we are too reliant on the Yanks for our nuclear deterant, hardware, software, maintenance, could they even have a kill switch on our nukes that we don't know about ?, we need our own bona fide totally independent capability and sorry to say we need our nukes pointing at major American cities as they can't be trusted by us (and shouldn't be trusted by us).
I remember in the cold War and apparently it came from a top Yank general that the Warsaw pact would reach the channel ports in days if they invaded from East Germany etc and at that point the Yanks would nuclear bomb Britain to stop the Russians using Britain as an airbase/lanchpad for missiles to attack America, at the time their missiles could not reach mainland America (or all parts) from the Eastern block but could from Britain (something like that anyway).
Are the Yanks really friends of ours, they were a combined half a decade late entering both World wars, I'm all for our weapons pointing at the United States (particularly at this point in time they are even making veiled threats towards Canada as well as other so called allies) as well as other countries that might be a problem for us. |  |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 14:46 - Oct 5 with 597 views | ncswan |
| USA UK Relations on 12:35 - Oct 5 by trampie |
The worry is we are too reliant on the Yanks for our nuclear deterant, hardware, software, maintenance, could they even have a kill switch on our nukes that we don't know about ?, we need our own bona fide totally independent capability and sorry to say we need our nukes pointing at major American cities as they can't be trusted by us (and shouldn't be trusted by us).
I remember in the cold War and apparently it came from a top Yank general that the Warsaw pact would reach the channel ports in days if they invaded from East Germany etc and at that point the Yanks would nuclear bomb Britain to stop the Russians using Britain as an airbase/lanchpad for missiles to attack America, at the time their missiles could not reach mainland America (or all parts) from the Eastern block but could from Britain (something like that anyway).
Are the Yanks really friends of ours, they were a combined half a decade late entering both World wars, I'm all for our weapons pointing at the United States (particularly at this point in time they are even making veiled threats towards Canada as well as other so called allies) as well as other countries that might be a problem for us. |
Wow!! I can only shake my head at your deluded post! You should thank your lucky STARS (and STRIPES) that you weren't required to speak German, Russian, Farsi, or Mandarin. But then again, maybe you wouldn't mind the latter two or three at all! | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| USA UK Relations on 15:14 - Oct 5 with 573 views | Luther27 |
| USA UK Relations on 11:32 - Oct 5 by JACKMANANDBOY |
If you select edit on your OP you can then select the correct board and repost there. |
Cheers…the Boss did it for me!
Thanks Keith! | | | |
| USA UK Relations on 15:21 - Oct 5 with 561 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
Considering the airbase is entirely US run presumably its security falls within the remit of US forces. If they feel they cannot protect an asset buried deep in the rural English countryside to the point where they have to evacuate all hardware then there must be a serious threat in the background. |  |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 15:26 - Oct 5 with 545 views | trampie |
| USA UK Relations on 14:46 - Oct 5 by ncswan |
Wow!! I can only shake my head at your deluded post! You should thank your lucky STARS (and STRIPES) that you weren't required to speak German, Russian, Farsi, or Mandarin. But then again, maybe you wouldn't mind the latter two or three at all! |
We fought without you Yanks for years, the Krauts could not get across the channel our Navy was still relatively strong at the time and RAF stopped them getting air power, then the Russians who was facing the majority of the German forces turned the tide sending the Germans back to their homeland.
If anything we saved you from occupation as there is a strong school of thought that we knew Pearl Harbour was happening as we ruled something like a quarter of the World's land surface and had spies, eyes and ears everywhere and figured it would bring you into the war as you weren't up for it, of course the real conspiracy was that Churchill told your President who was trying to persuade you lot to enter the war for your own good kept quiet but made sure half the 'Pacific Fleet' was at sea ready to fight another day.
You have now been taken over by a foreign power anyway in the shape of Isreal you do what they tell you to do, I expect you to be speaking Hebrew in a short space of time. [Post edited 5 Oct 15:29]
| |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 15:40 - Oct 5 with 529 views | Boundy |
| USA UK Relations on 15:26 - Oct 5 by trampie |
We fought without you Yanks for years, the Krauts could not get across the channel our Navy was still relatively strong at the time and RAF stopped them getting air power, then the Russians who was facing the majority of the German forces turned the tide sending the Germans back to their homeland.
If anything we saved you from occupation as there is a strong school of thought that we knew Pearl Harbour was happening as we ruled something like a quarter of the World's land surface and had spies, eyes and ears everywhere and figured it would bring you into the war as you weren't up for it, of course the real conspiracy was that Churchill told your President who was trying to persuade you lot to enter the war for your own good kept quiet but made sure half the 'Pacific Fleet' was at sea ready to fight another day.
You have now been taken over by a foreign power anyway in the shape of Isreal you do what they tell you to do, I expect you to be speaking Hebrew in a short space of time. [Post edited 5 Oct 15:29]
|
and for those years without the yanks we were losing and without Rosevelt being an anglophile we wouldn't have has lend lease to allow us to keep on fighting or the convoys which kept us alive , Hitler didn't attempt to cross the channel because the only battle we won up unti 1941 was the one fought by air power and without aircover he knew he couldn't attempt a crossing . Without America do you honestly belive we'd have beaten Germany ? I wonder uniform you'd have put on . | |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 15:51 - Oct 5 with 511 views | trampie |
| USA UK Relations on 15:40 - Oct 5 by Boundy |
and for those years without the yanks we were losing and without Rosevelt being an anglophile we wouldn't have has lend lease to allow us to keep on fighting or the convoys which kept us alive , Hitler didn't attempt to cross the channel because the only battle we won up unti 1941 was the one fought by air power and without aircover he knew he couldn't attempt a crossing . Without America do you honestly belive we'd have beaten Germany ? I wonder uniform you'd have put on . |
If the Yanks had continued to stay out of ww2 we wouldn't have lost to the Germans as they would not have been able to invade us, the Germans would have ruled Western Europe but not Blighty, so we would never have ended up speaking German. | |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 15:55 - Oct 5 with 513 views | Boundy |
| USA UK Relations on 15:51 - Oct 5 by trampie |
If the Yanks had continued to stay out of ww2 we wouldn't have lost to the Germans as they would not have been able to invade us, the Germans would have ruled Western Europe but not Blighty, so we would never have ended up speaking German. |
Maybe what's in your head should stay there , because you're taking nonsense . | |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 15:56 - Oct 5 with 511 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
| USA UK Relations on 15:40 - Oct 5 by Boundy |
and for those years without the yanks we were losing and without Rosevelt being an anglophile we wouldn't have has lend lease to allow us to keep on fighting or the convoys which kept us alive , Hitler didn't attempt to cross the channel because the only battle we won up unti 1941 was the one fought by air power and without aircover he knew he couldn't attempt a crossing . Without America do you honestly belive we'd have beaten Germany ? I wonder uniform you'd have put on . |
It went the other way too. Without the British and her empires support the US would have struggled against Japan. The campaigns in Burma and places like that tied up hundreds of thousands of Japanese soldiers. Also without the British the Americans wouldn’t have had vital technology like radar, and the science that led to the Manhattan Project basically started in Birmingham University (ironically by a German and an Austrian).
Without this vital support the war would have gone on for several more years and many more millions would have died. | |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 16:15 - Oct 5 with 489 views | trampie |
| USA UK Relations on 15:55 - Oct 5 by Boundy |
Maybe what's in your head should stay there , because you're taking nonsense . |
At the start of ww2 the Yanks had something like only the 20th largest army in the World, badly trained, badly equipped we had to help them as they had little technology, we had developed the jet engine, we had radar, the Yanks could not fly at night, so the RAF had to do it and blow Germany to bits the Yanks didn't have the capability and then we fought the Japs in Burma that took the pressure of the Yanks out in the Far East, we did as much for them as they did for us even more possibly but we don't get the recognition, I blame Hollywood films for that. | |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 16:43 - Oct 5 with 476 views | Treforys_Jack |
| USA UK Relations on 15:55 - Oct 5 by Boundy |
Maybe what's in your head should stay there , because you're taking nonsense . |
Absolutely this. |  | | |
| USA UK Relations on 16:51 - Oct 5 with 455 views | trampie |
Since they started chucking tea into Boston Harbour we should not fully trust them. | |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 16:59 - Oct 5 with 452 views | 1983 |
What utter BS !
Well over 400,000 Yanks died in WW2 and not far off the same Brits without counting Canadians & Indians....etc.
Granted USA were a bit slow to the party but without their men, arsenal..etc.
We would be doomed.
USA are turning their backs on us now because we are weak as pish and WW2 is getting further and further away.
Churchill & Maggie are spinning in thier graves.
During the embassy hostage in the early 1980's, Maggie said send in the SAS she wanted it broadcasted live on TV to show the world not to fcuk with us.....
Now?? No words |  |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 17:05 - Oct 5 with 442 views | 1983 |
| USA UK Relations on 15:51 - Oct 5 by trampie |
If the Yanks had continued to stay out of ww2 we wouldn't have lost to the Germans as they would not have been able to invade us, the Germans would have ruled Western Europe but not Blighty, so we would never have ended up speaking German. |
BS
Hilter was coming for us | |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 17:54 - Oct 5 with 415 views | trampie |
| USA UK Relations on 16:59 - Oct 5 by 1983 |
What utter BS !
Well over 400,000 Yanks died in WW2 and not far off the same Brits without counting Canadians & Indians....etc.
Granted USA were a bit slow to the party but without their men, arsenal..etc.
We would be doomed.
USA are turning their backs on us now because we are weak as pish and WW2 is getting further and further away.
Churchill & Maggie are spinning in thier graves.
During the embassy hostage in the early 1980's, Maggie said send in the SAS she wanted it broadcasted live on TV to show the world not to fcuk with us.....
Now?? No words |
According to all knowing AI , Britain would likely not have been conquered during ww2 even if the USA had stayed out of the war.
Navy would have sunk German transport ships, Airforce would have and did match their Airforce and the Army would have stopped them getting off the beaches if they had even got that far, they knew the odds were not in their favour although they clearly thought about it, once they failed to win the battle of Britain in the air they gave up on the idea of attempting a land invasion of Blighty. | |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 17:58 - Oct 5 with 393 views | onehunglow |
| USA UK Relations on 16:59 - Oct 5 by 1983 |
What utter BS !
Well over 400,000 Yanks died in WW2 and not far off the same Brits without counting Canadians & Indians....etc.
Granted USA were a bit slow to the party but without their men, arsenal..etc.
We would be doomed.
USA are turning their backs on us now because we are weak as pish and WW2 is getting further and further away.
Churchill & Maggie are spinning in thier graves.
During the embassy hostage in the early 1980's, Maggie said send in the SAS she wanted it broadcasted live on TV to show the world not to fcuk with us.....
Now?? No words |
They ain’t perfect but in a world with a vicious killing Russian empire continuing to kill unrelentingly the USA really are or should be our friends
Trampie and his Welsh pacifist cowards are the reason we are so divided
Russia is our enemy and has been for a long time | |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 17:58 - Oct 5 with 400 views | raynor94 |
| USA UK Relations on 15:55 - Oct 5 by Boundy |
Maybe what's in your head should stay there , because you're taking nonsense . |
100% |  |
| |
| USA UK Relations on 18:00 - Oct 5 with 397 views | JJBomber |
| USA UK Relations on 15:55 - Oct 5 by Boundy |
Maybe what's in your head should stay there , because you're taking nonsense . |
He's talking out of the other end, not his head! | | | |
| USA UK Relations on 18:17 - Oct 5 with 378 views | trampie |
| USA UK Relations on 17:58 - Oct 5 by onehunglow |
They ain’t perfect but in a world with a vicious killing Russian empire continuing to kill unrelentingly the USA really are or should be our friends
Trampie and his Welsh pacifist cowards are the reason we are so divided
Russia is our enemy and has been for a long time |
Pacifist oh no not me, fight the good fight and onward Christian soldiers I say.
Russia were our allies and in the end did as much as anyone the defeat the Nazis. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.