| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:44 - Feb 1 with 1694 views | Darran |
What bit is fresh? |  |
|  |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:47 - Feb 1 with 1664 views | Phaedrus |
Pure conjecture.If there is any upside, anything that appears on that website can be safely laughed at. [Post edited 1 Feb 2014 9:49]
|  |
| And what is good Phaedrus, and what is not good. Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:48 - Feb 1 with 1661 views | 3swan |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:44 - Feb 1 by Darran |
What bit is fresh? |
If they post articles enough times, when he does go (when) they can say they announced the problems first.
This will run and run until they find something else to print about |  | | |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:49 - Feb 1 with 1651 views | Marco82 |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:44 - Feb 1 by Darran |
What bit is fresh? |
The fact that it is today. It's a fresh report. | | | |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:49 - Feb 1 with 1636 views | Phaedrus |
Man walks on moon. fresh report. | |
| And what is good Phaedrus, and what is not good. Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:52 - Feb 1 with 1613 views | LeonisGod |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:44 - Feb 1 by Darran |
What bit is fresh? |
Freshly recycled Darren. Must be at least 8 months since this sort of b0llox began. What is the point of that 'news' site? |  | | |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:52 - Feb 1 with 1606 views | jacksinceever |
Working on the possibility that it is all true, then Jenkins is 100% correct in his actions.
If Laudrup is adamant in going at the end of the season, then why would Huw & the board back him by spending millions on a player that our next manager may not want ? |  | | |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:53 - Feb 1 with 1597 views | Marco82 |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:52 - Feb 1 by LeonisGod |
Freshly recycled Darren. Must be at least 8 months since this sort of b0llox began. What is the point of that 'news' site? |
Wowzers, don't shoot the messanger guys! | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:53 - Feb 1 with 1589 views | Darran |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:49 - Feb 1 by Marco82 |
The fact that it is today. It's a fresh report. |
I see. | |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:02 - Feb 1 with 1520 views | monmouth |
And below it, the swans target pullis 'story' . Ffs give it a rest. We all expected 2 years, we will probably only get two years. Where's the fecking fire? |  |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:02 - Feb 1 with 1516 views | FearOfAJackPlanet |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:52 - Feb 1 by jacksinceever |
Working on the possibility that it is all true, then Jenkins is 100% correct in his actions.
If Laudrup is adamant in going at the end of the season, then why would Huw & the board back him by spending millions on a player that our next manager may not want ? |
So instead of spending millions on players the next manager may or may not want, they're looking to...spend millions on players the next manager may or may not want (Cork)? Have I got that right? |  |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:07 - Feb 1 with 1462 views | jacksinceever |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:02 - Feb 1 by FearOfAJackPlanet |
So instead of spending millions on players the next manager may or may not want, they're looking to...spend millions on players the next manager may or may not want (Cork)? Have I got that right? |
No. If the basis of this story is to be believed it would have gone something like:
Swans offer £3 mill, Southampton want more, Huw says no, Southampton say feck off, Laudrup chucks his toys.
I don't know where the truth lies, all these stories are just conjecture and rumour.
The only people that know what happened are the management & staff at the respective clubs, and possibly the player. | | | |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:13 - Feb 1 with 1389 views | FearOfAJackPlanet |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:07 - Feb 1 by jacksinceever |
No. If the basis of this story is to be believed it would have gone something like:
Swans offer £3 mill, Southampton want more, Huw says no, Southampton say feck off, Laudrup chucks his toys.
I don't know where the truth lies, all these stories are just conjecture and rumour.
The only people that know what happened are the management & staff at the respective clubs, and possibly the player. |
No, the story is implying that the tensions arose as the Chairman is trying to sign a player (Cork) irrespective of the manager's wishes as the manager won't be here next season.
"Laudrup and Jenkins are said to have had a difficult working relationship for some time and the chairman is now believed to be targeting players who he believes will be at the club longer than the manager"
It's all b*llshit anyway, but there we have it. | |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:15 - Feb 1 with 1367 views | longlostjack |
What happens at Southampton after the summer is anybody's guess so no harm in putting in a cheeky little bid to let the player know he is on the radar - as for Sports Direct any site that talks about us and Pullis in the same breath is clearly a joke. |  |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:16 - Feb 1 with 1363 views | Dr_Winston |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 09:52 - Feb 1 by jacksinceever |
Working on the possibility that it is all true, then Jenkins is 100% correct in his actions.
If Laudrup is adamant in going at the end of the season, then why would Huw & the board back him by spending millions on a player that our next manager may not want ? |
The rate we go through managers that's a risk we take when we sign any player.
The board already dictate a certain style of play and hire their managers accordingly. That should ensure that any manager they appoint can make use of the players he inherits. It's the whole ethos of what we do.
What they then have to do then is get the f*ck out of the way and let the manager manage. If he wants a player and it is within the clubs budget then they should do what they can to bring them in. |  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:17 - Feb 1 with 1339 views | blaine_scfc |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:16 - Feb 1 by Dr_Winston |
The rate we go through managers that's a risk we take when we sign any player.
The board already dictate a certain style of play and hire their managers accordingly. That should ensure that any manager they appoint can make use of the players he inherits. It's the whole ethos of what we do.
What they then have to do then is get the f*ck out of the way and let the manager manage. If he wants a player and it is within the clubs budget then they should do what they can to bring them in. |
Good post |  | | |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:20 - Feb 1 with 1318 views | 2face |
I saw "sportsdirect..." and didn't bother to read any further. [Post edited 1 Feb 2014 10:22]
| | | |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:21 - Feb 1 with 1292 views | perchrockjack |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:20 - Feb 1 by 2face |
I saw "sportsdirect..." and didn't bother to read any further. [Post edited 1 Feb 2014 10:22]
|
we need Lifey for some positive talk right now | |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:25 - Feb 1 with 1260 views | JackSomething |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:20 - Feb 1 by 2face |
I saw "sportsdirect..." and didn't bother to read any further. [Post edited 1 Feb 2014 10:22]
|
Is the correct answer. |  |
| You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help. |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:30 - Feb 1 with 1228 views | raynor94 |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:21 - Feb 1 by perchrockjack |
we need Lifey for some positive talk right now |
What would be nice is for you to stop jumping on every piece of rubbish journalism sports direct my arse |  |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:36 - Feb 1 with 1169 views | perchrockjack |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:30 - Feb 1 by raynor94 |
What would be nice is for you to stop jumping on every piece of rubbish journalism sports direct my arse |
What would also be nice is for you to address the subject not the individual but that s not what you are on this board for is it.
You take an innocuous comment tongue in cheek and twist it for some arcane reason best know to yourself.
I m not even commented about whether Ngog or Emnes are beneficial to our club.
Frankly, now that Ive mentioned it, LAUDRUP and theboard clearluy are hoping the original squad comes good and does the business, which is fine but anyone seriously being POSITIVE about us avoiding the drop is clearly rather too optimistic. We all ope we ll be ok but to be CERTAIN is madness.
The new players will be periferal and Ngog will get almost Vasquez style stick as he is and has been utter shtye but we ve signed him so we HOPE he comes good. Emnes is a name from the PAST .
I m out of here | |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:39 - Feb 1 with 1146 views | JackSomething |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:36 - Feb 1 by perchrockjack |
What would also be nice is for you to address the subject not the individual but that s not what you are on this board for is it.
You take an innocuous comment tongue in cheek and twist it for some arcane reason best know to yourself.
I m not even commented about whether Ngog or Emnes are beneficial to our club.
Frankly, now that Ive mentioned it, LAUDRUP and theboard clearluy are hoping the original squad comes good and does the business, which is fine but anyone seriously being POSITIVE about us avoiding the drop is clearly rather too optimistic. We all ope we ll be ok but to be CERTAIN is madness.
The new players will be periferal and Ngog will get almost Vasquez style stick as he is and has been utter shtye but we ve signed him so we HOPE he comes good. Emnes is a name from the PAST .
I m out of here |
Frankly I'm more worried about the contents of my son's rather smelly nappy than I am about us getting relegated, so obviously I'm too optimistic which is news to me. | |
| You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help. |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:44 - Feb 1 with 1095 views | raynor94 |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:36 - Feb 1 by perchrockjack |
What would also be nice is for you to address the subject not the individual but that s not what you are on this board for is it.
You take an innocuous comment tongue in cheek and twist it for some arcane reason best know to yourself.
I m not even commented about whether Ngog or Emnes are beneficial to our club.
Frankly, now that Ive mentioned it, LAUDRUP and theboard clearluy are hoping the original squad comes good and does the business, which is fine but anyone seriously being POSITIVE about us avoiding the drop is clearly rather too optimistic. We all ope we ll be ok but to be CERTAIN is madness.
The new players will be periferal and Ngog will get almost Vasquez style stick as he is and has been utter shtye but we ve signed him so we HOPE he comes good. Emnes is a name from the PAST .
I m out of here |
The subject is a rubbish piece of journalism full stop | |
| |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:45 - Feb 1 with 1089 views | IAN05 |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 10:39 - Feb 1 by JackSomething |
Frankly I'm more worried about the contents of my son's rather smelly nappy than I am about us getting relegated, so obviously I'm too optimistic which is news to me. |
Why people continue to read and post links to that site is beyond me. Everything they have posted about us has been incorrect so far | | | |
| Fresh Jenkins v Laudrup story this morning on 11:21 - Feb 1 with 893 views | Phil_S |
Can I also point to the fact that there is nothing in that article to back it up
If I posted an article on here that Jose Mourinho and Abramovich had a falling out over the sale of Mata would people on Chelsea forums believe it? |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
